Skip to content

Effectiveness of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Is Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Effective in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: a Comparison Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01273818
Enrollment
276
Registered
2011-01-11
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

inguinal hernia, infection prophylaxis, topical gentamicin

Brief summary

Aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of topical gentamicin to prevent post-operative infection in inguinal tension-free hernia repair operation.Secondary aim is, if it is effective as a prophylactic agent, to compare it's effect with intra venous single dose cefazolin sodium prophylaxis.

Detailed description

This study is a single blind prospective randomized trial. To measure and compare the effectiveness intra-operative topical gentamicin application in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in contrast to intravenous peri-operative prophylactic cefazolin sodium and combination of gentamicin and cephazolin this study is designed. The patients are grouped randomly in to two groups: * Group1;intravenous cefazolin sodium * Group2;topical gentamicin * Group3:topical gentamicin and intravenous cefazolin sodium As a control group we decided to use the data of control groups ( without any prophylactic agent usage ) of previous studies done in our clinic and medical data base reviews.

Interventions

DRUGGentamicin and cefazolin

80 mg topically, intra-operative,single dose and intravenous 1000 mg cefazolin 1 hour before operation

DRUGCefazolin

1000 mg cefazolin application intravenously 1 hour before operation

DRUGGentamicin

80 mg gentamicin application intraoperatively

Sponsors

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of inguinal hernia

Exclusion criteria

* Femoral hernia * Emergency cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Post-operative Infectionwithin the first 30 days after surgery
Number of Infections in Each Study Armwithin the 30 days after surgeryPatients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of surgical site infection.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period begins in Jan 2011. This period will be completed when record of minimum number participants ( according to power analysis) in each arm is completed.Location is surgery clinic of our hospital.

Pre-assignment details

Totaly, 24 patients who were known using any kind of antibiotics for any reason just prior to surgery or just after the surgery and having history of allergic reactions to antibiotics used in this study were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gentamicin
Gentamicin arm: application of 80 mg gentamycin topically
87
Cephazolin
Application of 1000 mg cefazolin sodium intra venously 1 hour before surgery
98
Gentamicin+ Cefazolin Sodium
Application of intravenous 1000 mg cefazolin sodium 1 hour before surgery + topical 80 mg gentamicin intraoperatively
91
Total276

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1329

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCephazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin SodiumGentamicinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
33 Participants20 Participants27 Participants80 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants71 Participants60 Participants196 Participants
Age, Continuous49.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.85
50.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.49
50.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.39
50.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.85
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
98 participants91 participants87 participants276 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
93 Participants86 Participants80 Participants259 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 870 / 980 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 870 / 980 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Infections in Each Study Arm

Patients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of surgical site infection.

Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Topical GentamicinNumber of Infections in Each Study Arm1 infections
Cefazolin IVNumber of Infections in Each Study Arm3 infections
Topical and ivNumber of Infections in Each Study Arm0 infections
Comparison: Comparison Group Selection: our primary outcome is infection positive or negativeso, we compared the frequencies of being positive infections for these three groups. Our null hypothesis is positive infection frequencies are same for three groups. We calculated post-hoc power for this design and found 0.99 for the percentages which shows positive infections respectively for Topical Gentamicin, cefazoline iv and topical gentamicin and iv cefazolin; 2.3%, 3.1% and 0%.p-value: 0.198Fisher Exact
Primary

Rate of Post-operative Infection

Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026