Skip to content

In Hospital Care and Welfare Standard

Towards an In Hospital CARE AND WELFARE STANDARD for Frail Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01273116
Acronym
CWSInHosp
Enrollment
404
Registered
2011-01-10
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Decline and Complications of Frail Older Patients Admitted to Hospital

Keywords

frailty, integrated care, hospital, geriatrics, hospital-wide intervention

Brief summary

The current organization of hospital care for older patients with complex healthcare needs is of insufficient quality, safety and efficiency. Frail older patients have a higher risk for development of complications and consequently a higher length of hospital stay, a higher risk of functional decline, and higher care needs after discharge. As nearly half of the patients admitted to Dutch hospitals is over 65 years, it is highly necessary to adapt the organization of hospital care to their needs. Besides having introduced the medical specialty geriatrics, hospital management has not started to provide hospital wide healthcare tailored to frail older patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and examine the effectiveness of an intervention program for frail older patients admitted to hospital aimed at preventing functional decline and other hospital related negative outcomes.

Detailed description

The long-term objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of an intervention program for frail older patients admitted to hospital. The specific aims are: * To develop a model of integrated hospital care, according to the principle of the Chronic Care Model, focusing both on optimizing care and wellbeing. Feasibility of such a model of care was first evaluated in a pilot study. * To conduct a before-after study to evaluate the outcomes associated with the proposed model of hospital care in frail older inpatients. Information on outcome indicators, including autonomy, quality of life, physical and cognitive functioning, and service utilization will be collected and compared before and after implementation of the proposed model of hospital care. We expect that older patients who participate in the intervention program after one year of implementation, compared to patients who were admitted to hospital before implementation of the intervention program, will: * have less functional decline during admission and after three months follow-up compared to two weeks before admission; * have a lower incidence, severity and duration of delirium during admission; * have less cognitive decline during admission; * are more likely to be discharged directly to their own homes; * have less weight loss between admission and discharge; * experience less falls during admission; * experience less readmissions within one month after discharge; * have a shorter length of stay; * have a significant different pattern of use of health care services after three months follow-up; * experience more autonomy during hospital admission and better quality of life after three months follow-up. Additionally, we expect that the knowledge and attitudes toward care for older patients among nurses and physicians will change positively during implementation of the intervention program.

Interventions

OTHERCWS in Hospital

Every patient aged ≥70 years will be screened for frailty. (For) every frail patient: * will have a comprehensive (geriatric) assessment using an adapted version of the EasyCare instrument; * a geriatric consultation team will propose/recommend a tailored care and welfare plan, which will be updated at the moment of discharge; * will be discussed at least once in a multidisciplinary meeting; * a structured medication review will be carried out by a geriatrician; * is offered an activation programme by volunteers focusing on improvement of orientation, mobility, social activities or nutrition; * may receive a consult of a geriatrician, if judged necessary; * will receive extra attention on discharge arrangements. Hospital staff will be educated, disease-specific guidelines will be adapted to frail older patients.

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Frail patients aged 70 years or older, admitted to one of the participating hospital wards * Patients aged \<70 years, but living in a nursing home or diagnosed with dementia (and therefore also judged as frail)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients admitted \<48 hours * Palliative care is main goal of hospital admission * Patients admitted and treated by physicians from non-participating wards and specialities * Patients who do not speak or understand the Dutch language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient safetyduring hospital staycumulative incidence in delirium, falls, functional decline (GARS), and loss of cognition (MMSE)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence delirium (patient safety)during hospital stayincidence delirium (as judged by an independent physician, structured by daily application of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Delirium Observation Scale (DOS))
Autonomy of patient (quality of care)before implementation and one year after implementation of CWS InHospitalConsumer Quality Indicator CWS In Hospital: to address autonomy of patients, developed by own researchers
OPROCS (quality of care)discharge and 3 months follow-upOPROCS = cumulative outcome measure functional ability and quality of life etc. as determined by the elderly (Minimum Data Set)
Maintenance or improvement of functional status (patient safety)2 weeks before admission, discharge, 3 months after dischargemaintenance or improvement of functional status (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale GARS)): * difference between 2 weeks before admission and discharge * difference between discharge and 3 months after discharge * difference between 2 weeks before admission and 3 months after discharge
Readmissions (quality of care)within 1 month after dischargereadmissions within 1 month after discharge (Minimum Data Set, electronic health record)
Objective burden of care among informal caregivers (quality of care)from admission to 3 months after discharge patientobjective burden of care among informal caregivers (Minimum Data Set)
Cost-effectivenessfrom admission to 3 months after dischargeexpressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (length of stay; use of health care services (MDS), quality of life) primary outcomes as nominator, and expressed in costs per quality adjusted life years, all related to total health care costs from a societal perspective, from admission to three months following discharge
Validity of delirium diagnoses by the medical specialty involved (quality of care)before and one year after implementation CWS InHospitalrecognition of delirium by medical staff (nurses and doctors) compared to diagnoses by independent physician using CAM and DRS-r-98

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026