FindTrial
Sign In

Conventional SILS vs Harmonic Scalpel SILS

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01272505
Acronym
SILS
Enrollment
137
Registered
2011-01-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gallbladde Stones

Brief summary

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is gaining widespread acceptance. there are some obstacles making this procedure more complex than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of harmonic scalpel may aid in solving some of these issues that may allow simplification of the technique. The investigators will compare the ordinary method of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus harmonic scalpel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREconverntional SILC
PROCEDUREHarmonic scalpel Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones

Exclusion criteria

* acute cholecystitis cbd stones contraindications for laparoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
operative time—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complications—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactahmed a elgeidie, md
ahmedraoaf@mans.edu.eg0020105290111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026