Skip to content

Study of Regorafenib as a 3rd-line or Beyond Treatment for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care for Subjects With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Whose Disease Has Progressed Despite Prior Treatment With at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01271712
Acronym
GRID
Enrollment
199
Registered
2011-01-07
Start date
2011-01-04
Completion date
2019-04-15
Last updated
2021-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Keywords

Gastrointestinal stromal cancer, GIST, multikinase inhibitor

Brief summary

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for subjects with metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) whose disease has progressed despite prior treatment with at least imatinib and sunitinib. The study is composed of 3 periods: A Screening Period, a Treatment Period, and a Survival Follow up Period. Subjects randomized to be treated with regorafenib will receive 160 mg po od for 3 weeks of every 4 week (28 day) cycle (ie, 3 weeks on/1 week off). In addition subjects will receive best supportive care which excludes any disease specific anti cancer therapy such as any kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery. Tumor assessment will be every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, every 6 weeks for the next 3 months (through month 6), and every 8 weeks until the end of treatment, or more frequently if clinically indicated. Tumor assessments include CT or MRI and will be performed until tumor progression is seen in a central radiology review. Subjects receiving placebo who experience disease progression may be offered active treatment. Subjects who experience progression during regorafenib treatment may continue open label treatment. All subjects will enter the Survival Follow-up Period upon discontinuation of randomized study treatment.

Interventions

DRUGRegorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)

160 mg po once daily (od), 3 weeks on/1 week off. Route of administration: oral

DRUGPlacebo

once daily (od), 3 weeks on/1 week off. Route of administration: oral

DRUGBest supportive care

Best supportive care includes any method to preserve the comfort and dignity of the patients, and excludes any disease-specific anti-neoplastic therapy such as any kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical intervention.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects 18 years of age. * Subjects with histologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable GIST. * At least imatinib and sunitinib as prior treatment regimens, with objective disease progression or intolerance to imatinib, as well as disease progression while on sunitinib therapy. Additionally, disease progression or intolerance to other systemic therapies, as well as investigational new agents, is allowed, except prior treatment with any other vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor. * Subjects must have at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. A lesion in a previously irradiated area is eligible to be considered as measurable disease as long as there is objective evidence of progression of the lesion prior to study enrollment. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1. * Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function as assessed by laboratory parameters. Recovery to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grade 0 or 1 level or recovery to baseline preceding the prior treatment from any previous drug/procedure-related toxicity (except alopecia and anemia).

Exclusion criteria

* Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before start of study medication. * Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2. * Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest, new-onset angina, ie, within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 6 months before start of study medication. * Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management). Arterial thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), or pulmonary embolism within the 6 months before start of study drug or venous thrombotic events such as deep vein thrombosis within the 3 months before start of study drug. * Ongoing infection grade 2 National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0. Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors. * Subjects with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks prior to the start of study drug. Non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture. * Persistent proteinuria of NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 grade 3 or higher (3.5 g/24 hrs, measured by urine protein:creatinine ratio on a random urine sample).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalFrom randomization of the first subject until approximately 144 progression-free survival events had occurred (study duration approximately one year)Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v.1.1. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Progression (TTP)From randomization of the first subject until until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 yearTime to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST \[Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors\] v.1.1). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.
Tumor ResponseFrom randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 yearTumor Response of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).\], Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\], Stable Disease \[SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\], or Progressive Disease \[PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.\]) observed during the trial period and assessed according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results are based on central evaluation.
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (08 Jun 2015)Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their date of last contact. Median OS was not observed at the time of PFS analysis and first analysis of OS, therefore only the proportion of death events was reported in the results posting system. This approach was maintained for the subsequent updates in the results posting system.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 yearDisease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).), Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.), or Stable Disease (SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. SD had to be maintained for at least 12 weeks from the first demonstration of that rating. Results are based on central evaluation.
Duration of Response (DOR)From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 yearDuration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).\] or Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\]) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.) is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurs first, according to RECIST v1.1. Subjects still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Duration of response defined for responders only, i.e CR or PR. Results are based on central evaluation.
Objective Response RateFrom randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year.Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Results are based on central evaluation.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 240 participants with metastatic and/or unresectable GIST whose disease had progressed despite prior treatments with at least imatinib and sunitinib were screened; 199 were randomized. Patients must have shown objective disease progression or intolerance to imatinib, as well as disease progression while on sunitinib treatment.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either regorafenib (133 patients) or placebo (66 patients). Randomization was stratified according 3rd vs. 4th line of therapy (at least 50% of patients were to be 3rd line), and geographical region (Asia vs.rest of world).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)
Participants received Regorafenib (Stivarga) 160 mg (4 x 40 mg tablets) per os once daily, 3 weeks on therapy followed by 1 week off therapy to comprise a cycle of 4 weeks
133
Placebo
Participants received matching Placebo tablets per os once daily, 3 weeks on therapy followed by 1 week off therapy to comprise a cycle of 4 weeks
66
Total199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double Blind TreatmentAdverse Event94
Double Blind TreatmentDeath20
Double Blind TreatmentLack of Efficacy10
Double Blind TreatmentNon compliance with study drug20
Double Blind TreatmentProgressive disease233
Double Blind Treatmentreceive no study drug10
Double Blind TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject41
Open Label TreatmentAdverse Event148
Open Label TreatmentDeath65
Open Label TreatmentNon-compliance with study drug10
Open Label TreatmentPhysician Decision20
Open Label TreatmentProgressive disease5932
Open Label TreatmentProtocol Violation01
Open Label TreatmentSwitching to other therapy21
Open Label Treatmenttransferred to rollover study10
Open Label TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject611
Safety Follow-upDeath117
Safety Follow-upNo follow-up11
Safety Follow-upNot analyzed after cutoff 08Jun201534
Safety Follow-upProgressive disease10
Safety Follow-upProtocol Violation11
Safety Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject42
Survival Follow-upNot analyzed after cutoff 08Jun2015156

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRegorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
58.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
ECOG Performance Status (PS)]
Missing
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Performance Status (PS)]
PS 0
73 Participants37 Participants110 Participants
ECOG Performance Status (PS)]
PS 1
60 Participants29 Participants89 Participants
ECOG Performance Status (PS)]
PS 2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Prior anti-cancer drug group
3rd line
74 Participants39 Participants113 Participants
Prior anti-cancer drug group
4th line and beyond
59 Participants27 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants24 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants42 Participants127 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
40 / 417 / 847 / 58155 / 19048 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 417 / 858 / 58189 / 19075 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 418 / 831 / 58103 / 19039 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v.1.1. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until approximately 144 progression-free survival events had occurred (study duration approximately one year)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) - defined as all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Progression-free Survival147 Days
PlaceboProgression-free Survival28 Days
Comparison: The two treatment groups were compared using a stratified log rank test with a one-sided alpha of 0.01 stratified by (3rd vs 4th-line; and geographical region). The null hypothesis that both treatment arms have the same PFS distribution was tested against the alternative hypothesis that the distribution of PFS in the regorafenib arm is different from the control arm according to a proportional hazards relation between the treatment arms.p-value: <0.000001Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratio and its 95% CI (Confidence Interval) was based on stratified Cox Regression Model95% CI: [0.185, 0.388]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).), Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.), or Stable Disease (SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. SD had to be maintained for at least 12 weeks from the first demonstration of that rating. Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Disease Control Rate (DCR)52.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboDisease Control Rate (DCR)9.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).\] or Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\]) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.) is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurs first, according to RECIST v1.1. Subjects still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Duration of response defined for responders only, i.e CR or PR. Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year

Population: Full Analysis Set with response participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Duration of Response (DOR)99 Days
PlaceboDuration of Response (DOR)30 Days
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Objective Response Rate4.5 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboObjective Response Rate1.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their date of last contact. Median OS was not observed at the time of PFS analysis and first analysis of OS, therefore only the proportion of death events was reported in the results posting system. This approach was maintained for the subsequent updates in the results posting system.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (08 Jun 2015)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). 58 (87.9%) patients in placebo group and 91 (68.4%) patients in regorafenib had started open-label treatment with regorafenib before time of final database cutoff 08 Jun 2015

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Overall Survival82.0 Percentage of patients with death
PlaceboOverall Survival80.3 Percentage of patients with death
p-value: 0.285777Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratio and its 95% CI was based on stratified Cox Regression Model95% CI: [0.653, 1.265]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST \[Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors\] v.1.1). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Time to Progression (TTP)165 Days
PlaceboTime to Progression (TTP)28 Days
p-value: <0.000001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.17, 0.364]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Tumor Response

Tumor Response of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).\], Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\], Stable Disease \[SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.\], or Progressive Disease \[PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.\]) observed during the trial period and assessed according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results are based on central evaluation.

Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Tumor ResponsePartial Response (PR)4.5 Percentage of Participants
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Tumor ResponseStable Disease (SD)71.4 Percentage of Participants
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Tumor ResponseComplete Response (CR)0 Percentage of Participants
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Tumor ResponseNot Assessable3.0 Percentage of Participants
Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)Tumor ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)21.1 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboTumor ResponseNot Assessable1.5 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboTumor ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)63.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboTumor ResponseComplete Response (CR)0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboTumor ResponseStable Disease (SD)33.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboTumor ResponsePartial Response (PR)1.5 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026