Skip to content

A Study of Single-Agent Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Two (HER2) Negative Breast Cancer

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Single-Agent Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Two (HER2) Negative Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01268150
Enrollment
56
Registered
2010-12-29
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Recurrent, Metastatic Breast Cancer ( HER2 Negative)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent eribulin mesylate for first-line treatment of subjects with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, single-arm, Phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent eribulin mesylate for first-line treatment of subjects with locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative breast cancer. A total of 52 adult female subjects will be enrolled and treated with eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2 as an intravenous \[i.v.\] infusion over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle).

Interventions

DRUGEribulin mesylate

Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion (over 2 to 5 minutes) on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria Females age 18 years or older at the time of informed consent Have histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast Subjects with locally recurrent or metastatic disease with at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria v 1.1 Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative disease as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or 0 or 1+ by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Life expectancy of greater than 24 weeks Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score (PS) of 0, 1 or 2 At least 12 months since prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy At least 2 weeks since prior radiotherapy or endocrine therapy, with complete recovery from the effects of these interventions Adequate renal function Adequate bone marrow function Adequate liver function Key

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: Prior chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or investigational therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer Subjects who have had a prior malignancy other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or nonmelanoma skin cancer Prior exposure of greater than 360 mg/m2 doxorubicin or liposomal doxorubicin, greater than 120 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, greater than 90 mg/m2 idarubicin, or greater than720 mg/m2 epirubicin Inflammatory breast cancer Clinically significant cardiovascular impairment Subjects with known CNS disease are not eligible, except for those with treated brain metastasis. Pulmonary lymphangitic involvement that results in pulmonary dysfunction requiring the use of oxygen Currently pregnant or breast-feeding. Subjects with pre-existing Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy. Any peripheral neuropathy must recover to Grade 2 before enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Cycle 1 (Day 1) until first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 yearsThe ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Targeted lesions were assessed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which were then assessed by the investigator based on RECIST. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Possible CR and PR had to be confirmed no fewer than 4 weeks after the initial response assessment. A brain and bone scan was performed by CT/MRI within 1 week after confirmation of a response to ensure no new metastases. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat evaluations, to be performed not fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria were first met. ORR = CR + PR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Response (CR or PR)Treatment Phase (Day 1 Cycle 1) to earliest date of confirmed objective response (CR or PR), assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 yearsTime to first response was defined for participants whose BOR was a CR or PR. Analysis was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimated number of months to CR or PR. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on CR or PR.
Duration of ResponseFirst date of CR or PR to PD or Death from any cause, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 yearsDuration of response was measured for participants who were responders only, had attained a BOR that was CR or PR. The duration of response was measured from time that response criteria for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) were first met until the date that progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause was first objectively documented. Participants who did not have PD were censored on the day of their last tumor assessment. Duration of response was summarized for the responders using Kaplan-Meier estimation method. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on the length of response time.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Treatment Phase (Day 1 Cycle 1) to date of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 yearsPFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug until the date of first documentation of PD or date of death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who died without reported PD were considered to have progressed on the day of their death. Participants who were lost to follow-up or alive and without reported PD at the end of study were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants without evidence of PD upon discontinuation of study drug during the Extension Phase returned to the clinic for disease evaluation and PFS calculation every 12 weeks until PD was documented. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on PFS.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateBaseline until End of Treatment (within 21 days of last dose), assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 yearsTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, and occurring within 30 days of the last dose of study treatment, or if they were present prior to the first dose administration and increased in severity during the study. For each AE a participant with two or more TEAEs in that category were counted only once. TEAEs were considered related if the relationship of the event to study drug was possibly or probably related. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical experience that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Safety information will be summarized with adverse events. AEs were graded on a five-point scale according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eribulin Mesylate
Eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m\^2 was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.
56
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Extension PhaseAdverse Event3
Extension PhaseDisease progression18
Extension PhaseOther6
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event3
Treatment PhaseOther4
Treatment PhaseProgression of disease18
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEribulin Mesylate
Age, Continuous57.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.78
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Targeted lesions were assessed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which were then assessed by the investigator based on RECIST. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Possible CR and PR had to be confirmed no fewer than 4 weeks after the initial response assessment. A brain and bone scan was performed by CT/MRI within 1 week after confirmation of a response to ensure no new metastases. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat evaluations, to be performed not fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria were first met. ORR = CR + PR

Time frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1) until first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 years

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of eribulin mesylate.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Eribulin MesylateObjective Response Rate (ORR)28.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was measured for participants who were responders only, had attained a BOR that was CR or PR. The duration of response was measured from time that response criteria for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) were first met until the date that progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause was first objectively documented. Participants who did not have PD were censored on the day of their last tumor assessment. Duration of response was summarized for the responders using Kaplan-Meier estimation method. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on the length of response time.

Time frame: First date of CR or PR to PD or Death from any cause, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 years

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of eribulin mesylate and were determined to be responders (CR or PR) to study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin MesylateDuration of Response5.8 Months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug until the date of first documentation of PD or date of death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who died without reported PD were considered to have progressed on the day of their death. Participants who were lost to follow-up or alive and without reported PD at the end of study were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants without evidence of PD upon discontinuation of study drug during the Extension Phase returned to the clinic for disease evaluation and PFS calculation every 12 weeks until PD was documented. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on PFS.

Time frame: Treatment Phase (Day 1 Cycle 1) to date of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 years

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of eribulin mesylate.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin MesylateProgression-Free Survival (PFS)6.8 Months
Secondary

Time to First Response (CR or PR)

Time to first response was defined for participants whose BOR was a CR or PR. Analysis was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimated number of months to CR or PR. This statistical analysis method measures the effect of study drug on CR or PR.

Time frame: Treatment Phase (Day 1 Cycle 1) to earliest date of confirmed objective response (CR or PR), assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 years

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of eribulin mesylate and were determined to be responders (CR or PR) to study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin MesylateTime to First Response (CR or PR)1.4 Months
Other Pre-specified

To Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin Mesylate

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, and occurring within 30 days of the last dose of study treatment, or if they were present prior to the first dose administration and increased in severity during the study. For each AE a participant with two or more TEAEs in that category were counted only once. TEAEs were considered related if the relationship of the event to study drug was possibly or probably related. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical experience that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Safety information will be summarized with adverse events. AEs were graded on a five-point scale according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Time frame: Baseline until End of Treatment (within 21 days of last dose), assessed up to the data cutoff date (30 Aug 2013) up to 2.5 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one postbaseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateTEAEs100.0 Percentage of participants
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateTreatment-related TEAEs100.0 Percentage of participants
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateSerious TEAEs30.4 Percentage of participants
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateTreatment-related Serious TEAEs8.9 Percentage of participants
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateTEAEs leading to withdrawl of study drug10.7 Percentage of participants
Eribulin MesylateTo Assess the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) of Eribulin MesylateTEAEs leading to dose reduction35.7 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026