Skip to content

Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Intubation Success Rate?

Comparison of LMA-Fastrach® and I-gel® for Tracheal Intubation: Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Success Rate?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01265862
Enrollment
120
Registered
2010-12-23
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2012-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia, Intubation

Keywords

Tracheal intubation, Supraglottic airway devices, Patients undergoing general anesthesia

Brief summary

The investigators aim to compare two different types of supraglottic devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The investigators hypothesis is that the use of the I-gel® supraglottic airway device associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube will result in an equal success rate of fiberoptic tracheal intubation when compared to the LMA-Fastrach® associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube. Time to intubate with the I-gel® device should also be shorter.

Detailed description

Supraglottic airway devices such as LMA-Fastrach® and I-gel® provide patent airways during general anesthesia. The LMA-Fastrach® is designed to provide a conduit for blind or fiberscopically guided tracheal intubations. However, the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt through this device varies between 50 and 87%. The I-gel® is a newer device for airway management which, with its wide bore, allows direct passage of a tracheal tube. Recent studies suggest that the I-gel® is easy to insert and that limited experience is needed before a high success insertion rate is obtained. A recent study conducted in our center compared the LMA-Fastrach® to the I-gel® supraglottic airway device. Our results showed a lower success intubation rate in the I-gel® group. We noticed that there was a tendency for the endotracheal tube to impinge on the posterior and lateral aspect of the larynx. The endotracheal tube used for intubation in our study was a standard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube. We believe that an endotracheal tube with a flexible tip(GlideRite®) would increase the intubation success rate through the I-gel® device. However, based on our clinical experience with the GlideRite® tube, blind tracheal intubation through the I-gel® airway device may be associated with a low success rate related to a lack of rigidity of its tip. Its use in combination with a fibrescope could compensate for this weakness. A recent study performed on mannequins showed a comparable success intubation rate of 99% for the I-gel® and LMA-Fastrach® when associated to a fibrescope. In this prospective randomized study, we will compare the performance of the LMA-Fastrach® and the I-gel® associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube for fiberoptic tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Interventions

PROCEDURETracheal intubation through LMA-Fastrach®

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (LMA-Fastrach®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

PROCEDURETracheal intubation through I-gel®

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (I-gel®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

Sponsors

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 and older * Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4 * Contraindications to muscle relaxation * Mouth opening less than 2 cm * Patients at increased risk of regurgitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First attempt success rate of tracheal intubationAfter successful insertion of tracheal tube before the beginning of surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time needed for successful insertion of a supraglottic deviceAfter insertion of the device before the beginning of surgery
Time needed to obtain successful tracheal intubationAfter tracheal intubation before the beginning of surgery
First attempt success rate of supraglottic device insertionAfter insertion of the device before the beginning of surgery
Global success rate of supraglottic device insertionAfter insertion of the device before the beginning of surgery
Fibreoptic view following the supraglottic device insertionAfter insertion of the device before surgery

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026