Skip to content

Study to Compare TP-434 and Ertapenem in Community-acquired Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and PK of 2 Dose Regimens of TP-434 Compared With Ertapenem in Adult Community-Acquired Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01265784
Enrollment
143
Registered
2010-12-23
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2022-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

Brief summary

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of two dose regimens of TP-434 compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).

Interventions

DRUGTP-434
DRUGErtapenem
DRUGPlacebo

Administered IV to maintain the blind.

Sponsors

Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Abdominal pain/discomfort with onset prior to hospitalization * Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response * Physical findings consistent with intra-abdominal infection (IAI) * Clinical diagnosis of community-acquired IAI requiring urgent surgical or percutaneous intervention and not expected to require antibacterial therapy for longer than 14 days * Body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 30 kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2) * Able to provide informed consent. If the participant is unable to provide informed consent, the participant's legally acceptable representative may provide written consent in accordance with institutional guidelines * If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of child-bearing potential either: will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant/patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence

Exclusion criteria

* Symptoms related to diagnosis of complicated appendicitis (if current diagnosis) for \< 24 hours prior to current hospitalization * Previously hospitalized or admitted to a healthcare facility within the last 6 months * Managed by Staged Abdominal Repair or other open abdomen technique * Known at study entry to have an IAI caused by a pathogen(s) resistant to both study drug antibiotics * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score \> 25 * Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period * Any rapidly-progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness, including acute hepatic failure, respiratory failure and septic shock * Requirement for vasopressors at therapeutic dosages * Renal failure * Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease * Hematocrit \< 25% or hemoglobin \< 8 grams per deciliter (g/dL) * Neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count \< 1000 cells per cubic millimeter (mm\^3) * Platelet count \< 50,000/mm3 * Abnormal coagulation tests or participant on anticoagulants * Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, \> 40 milligrams \[mg\] prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks) * History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines or carbapenems * Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry * Known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold * Previously received TP-434 in a clinical trial * More than 24 hours duration of systemic antibiotic coverage for current condition * Received ertapenem or any other carbapenem, or tigecycline for the current infection * Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug or received systemic (IV or oral) antibiotics in the last 3 months * Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent * Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (Test-of-Cure \[TOC\] assessment was not available, death unrelated to cIAI, or some other reason).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFollow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFollow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFollow-Up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitFollow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitFollow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)Microbiological response was classified as favorable (eradication or presumed eradication), unfavorable (persistence, presumed persistence, superinfection, or new infection), or indeterminate (assessment not possible).
Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitEOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of TP-434Prior to first infusion and 1, 3, 7, 12, 48, and 108 hours after start of first infusion
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC[0-12]) of TP-434Prior to first infusion and 1, 3, 7, 12, 48, and 108 hours after start of first infusion
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitTOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Countries

Bulgaria, India, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by site of infection (complicated appendicitis versus all other diagnoses).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24h
TP-434 was administered IV at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India).
56
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12h
TP-434 was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India).
57
Ertapenem 1 g q24h
Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India).
30
Total143

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event100
Overall StudyDeath300
Overall StudyIncorrectly Randomized001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up532
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyProtocol Violation200
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject050

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hTP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hErtapenem 1 g q24hTotal
Age, Continuous43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.39
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.16
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.64
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
9 participants6 participants3 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
16 participants20 participants9 participants45 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
8 participants9 participants4 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
17 participants13 participants7 participants37 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
6 participants9 participants6 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants14 Participants8 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants43 Participants22 Participants103 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 5310 / 567 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 531 / 561 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure Visit

Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (Test-of-Cure \[TOC\] assessment was not available, death unrelated to cIAI, or some other reason).

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, had a baseline pathogen identified, and had a microbiological response assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitCure39 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitFailure3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitCure41 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitFailure2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure VisitCure24 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and for whom sufficient information was available to determine the participant's outcome with no confounding factors present that interfered with the assessment of that outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitFailure2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitCure47 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitCure47 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the EOT VisitCure27 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up Visit

Time frame: Follow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and for whom sufficient information was available to determine the participant's outcome with no confounding factors present that interfered with the assessment of that outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure4 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate4 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure45 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure23 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and for whom sufficient information was available to determine the participant's outcome with no confounding factors present that interfered with the assessment of that outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitCure46 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitFailure3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitCure47 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitFailure2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitCure26 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and met the minimal disease definition of intra-abdominal infection (IAI). The minimal disease definition included all IAI, whether complicated or not. Identification of a baseline pathogen was not required for this population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure49 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure52 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure28 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up Visit

Time frame: Follow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and met the minimal disease definition of IAI. The minimal disease definition included all IAI, whether complicated or not. Identification of a baseline pathogen was not required for this population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure4 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate9 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate10 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure45 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure24 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and met the minimal disease definition of IAI. The minimal disease definition included all IAI, whether complicated or not. Identification of a baseline pathogen was not required for this population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure46 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate5 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure47 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate8 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure26 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, had a baseline pathogen identified, and had a microbiological response assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitFailure2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitCure40 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitCure25 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up Visit

Time frame: Follow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, had a baseline pathogen identified, and had a microbiological response assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure4 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure36 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate2 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure39 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure21 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and had a baseline pathogen identified. The minimal disease definition of cIAI included IAI that extended beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and was associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure2 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure44 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitFailure1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the EOT VisitCure26 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up Visit

Time frame: Follow-Up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and had a baseline pathogen identified. The minimal disease definition of cIAI included IAI that extended beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and was associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure4 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure36 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate5 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate8 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure39 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure22 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and had a baseline pathogen identified. The minimal disease definition of cIAI included IAI that extended beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and was associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure39 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate6 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitCure24 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat (m-MITT) Population at the TOC VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitFailure2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitCure49 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitCure52 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitCure28 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitFailure1 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up Visit

Time frame: Follow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure4 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure41 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate9 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure45 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate10 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitCure24 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitIndeterminate3 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up VisitFailure2 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitIndeterminate5 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitFailure3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitCure46 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitFailure1 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitCure47 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitIndeterminate8 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitIndeterminate1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitFailure2 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hClinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC VisitCure26 participants
Secondary

Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT Visit

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, had a baseline pathogen identified, and had a microbiological response assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitFavorable40 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable2 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitFavorable41 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitFavorable25 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable1 participants
Secondary

Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, had a baseline pathogen identified, and had a microbiological response assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitFavorable39 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitFavorable41 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitFavorable24 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the ME Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable2 participants
Secondary

Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT Visit

Microbiological response was classified as favorable (eradication or presumed eradication), unfavorable (persistence, presumed persistence, superinfection, or new infection), or indeterminate (assessment not possible).

Time frame: EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and had a baseline pathogen identified. The minimal disease definition of cIAI included IAI that extended beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and was associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable2 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitFavorable41 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate2 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitFavorable44 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitUnfavorable1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the EOT VisitFavorable26 participants
Secondary

Microbiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC Visit

Time frame: TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, met the minimal disease definition of cIAI, and had a baseline pathogen identified. The minimal disease definition of cIAI included IAI that extended beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and was associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable3 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitFavorable39 participants
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate3 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable0 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitFavorable42 participants
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate5 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitFavorable24 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitIndeterminate1 participants
Ertapenem 1 g q24hMicrobiologic Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the m-MITT Population at the TOC VisitUnfavorable2 participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC[0-12]) of TP-434

Time frame: Prior to first infusion and 1, 3, 7, 12, 48, and 108 hours after start of first infusion

Population: All randomized participants without significant protocol deviations who received at least 1 dose of TP-434 and had evaluable AUC(0-12) data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hPharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC[0-12]) of TP-4344349.900 nanogram*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 2186.791
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hPharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC[0-12]) of TP-4343240.724 nanogram*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 1732.172
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of TP-434

Time frame: Prior to first infusion and 1, 3, 7, 12, 48, and 108 hours after start of first infusion

Population: All randomized participants without significant protocol deviations who received at least 1 dose of TP-434 and had evaluable Cmax data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24hPharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of TP-4341445.625 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1168.029
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12hPharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of TP-434952.608 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 759.754

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026