Skip to content

Long-Term Non-Interventional Latanoprost Study

A Prospective, Non-interventional, Longitudinal Cohort Study To Evaluate The Long-term Safety Of Latanoprost Treatment In Pediatric Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01265719
Acronym
LYNX
Enrollment
175
Registered
2010-12-23
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2021-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Keywords

Prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal, cohort study

Brief summary

This is a non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. A total of 150 pediatric subjects with glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure, including 75 latanoprost-treated subjects and 75 non-topical prostaglandin analogue treated subjects, will be enrolled from ophthalmic hospital clinics and academic ophthalmic centers. As a non-interventional study, the study subjects' continued use of latanoprost and assessments of ocular events will be obtained through the routine medical follow-up with treating ophthalmologists or other designated members of the medical care team.

Detailed description

At least 40 subjects in each of the following age groups: 1-\<5 years and 5-\<18 years. No minimum required numbers in the \<1 year age group.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention other than routine medical care

Subjects continuously treated with Latanoprost for at least one month Latanoprost treatment during the study period.

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female \<18 years of age (neonates must be at least 36 weeks gestational age). * Diagnosis of pediatric glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure. * Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject (and/or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. A signed and dated assent will be required where applicable according to local laws. For treated subjects only: * Continuously treated with latanoprost for at least 1 month within the year prior to the baseline examination. For untreated subjects only: * Continuously treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month prior to the baseline examination (based on the best knowledge of treating ophthalmologists), and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period; OR * No prior treatment with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues, and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable/unwilling to comply with protocol. * Pregnant or nursing females at baseline. * For treated subjects only: a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients contained in latanoprost (e.g., hypersensitivity to benzalkonium chloride).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsPatients familiar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using Snellen visual acuity. Patients who were unable or unfamiliar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using charts made up of numbers, pictures (eg, Schering's Children's Eye Chart or Allen Cards), E's, or Landolt's broken rings, and other methods which were equivalent to Snellen acuity eg, HOTV testing).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsThe horizontal corneal diameter was measured along the horizontal meridians. Diameter was measured using either a series of transparent plates with holes of different diameters in quarter-millimeter increments or with calibrated calipers compared against a ruler. When using calipers, the corneal diameter measurement was taken from limbus to a similar point 180° away at the opposite limbus. When not examining the children with anesthesia, it was recommended to use a tape measure across the head while measuring horizontal corneal diameter by photographic method.
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsIOP was preferably measured using 1 of 3 applanation-contact methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen® (tonometry). iCare® rebound tonometer was also allowed if it was used consistently throughout the study.
Cup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc RatiosEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsThe cup/disc ratio was recorded horizontally and vertically for each examination, and reported in 0.1 increments.
Visual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects.Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsA visual field examination was performed for those patients who can cooperate automated perimetry utilizing a threshold program. All visual fields was conducted utilizing the standard white background with a Goldmann size III white stimulus. For those patients who can not perform formal visual field testing, then field to confrontation test was used for younger, non-verbal children, central, steady and maintains fixation was used.
Iris Color DarkeningEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsChanges from baseline in iris color were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.
Localized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and ChoroidEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsChanges from baseline in localized pigmentation (nevi and freckles) of the conjunctiva, iris and choroid were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive ErrorEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsThe refractive error \[cycloplegic where appropriate (eg, those unable to cooperate with manifest refraction)\] were determined at the baseline visit and assessed at the following visits.
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsThe longest eyelash (mm) measured by caliper or ruler was recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit.
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsCentral corneal thickness was measured using a calibrated pachymeter, preferably an ultrasonic pachymeter.
Conjunctival/Ocular HyperemiaEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsConjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by slit-lamp examination. When slit-lamp examination is not possible due to subject cooperation, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used to assess this parameter. Conjunctival hyperemia was assessed and graded by ophthalmologist at baseline and follow-up visits from grades 0-3 and is as follows: 0 = None, Normal: few vessels of palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva easily observed 1. = Mild, Reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva 2. = Moderate, Bright reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva 3. = Severe, Deep, bright, and diffuse reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
Number of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment BiomicroscopyEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsSlit-lamp biomicroscopy (mounted or hand-held) without fluorescein and without dilation of the pupil was performed. When slit-lamp examination was not possible, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used. At each scheduled visit, deposition of pigment on the corneal endothelial layer or the lens capsule or any abnormalities of the lids, conjunctivae, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, or lens was examined.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineEvaluated at BaselineFundoscopy was performed after dilation of the pupils (eg, 1 % tropicamide or cyclopentolate and 2 ½ % phenylephrine, or a clinically- appropriate dose according to the clinician's standard care of each particular patient). The examination included an evaluation of the vitreous body, retina (including the macula), and optic nerve head. The fundoscopy e-CRF was completed only at baseline because the investigators were required to perform slit lamp, direct or indirect ophthalmoscopy at each visit and report any AEs observed which included the vitreous, retina and optic nerve.
Eyelash Darkening/ThickeningEvaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 monthsChanges from baseline in eyelash darkening/thickening/lengthening were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.

Countries

Belgium, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Peru, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 175 patients were enrolled into the study in 14 countries in Europe and South America: 102 in the latanoprost treatment group and 73 in the non-Prostaglandin (PG) treatment group.

Pre-assignment details

No significant events prior to group assignment are to be reported. This was a non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Pediatric patients with glaucoma or elevated intra ocular pressure (IOP) were enrolled into 2 groups: Latanoprost-treated patients and non-PG treated patients.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Latanoprost Group
Patients continuously treated with latanoprost for at least 1 month within 1 year before the baseline examination and treated with latanoprost during the study period. Patients continuously treated with latanoprost for at least 1 month within 1 year before the baseline examination only.
102
Non Prostaglandin Group
Patients continuously treated with latanoprost or other topical PG analogues for less than 1 month before the baseline examination, and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical PG analogues during the study period. Patients not treated with latanoprost or other topical PG analogues before the baseline examination, and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical PG analogues during the study period.
73
Total175

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyDoes not meet entrance criteria03
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up27
Overall StudyOther reasons20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject83

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLatanoprost GroupNon Prostaglandin GroupTotal
Age, Continuous8.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.96
6.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76
7.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.01
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants28 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants45 Participants99 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 10214 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 1022 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)

Patients familiar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using Snellen visual acuity. Patients who were unable or unfamiliar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using charts made up of numbers, pictures (eg, Schering's Children's Eye Chart or Allen Cards), E's, or Landolt's broken rings, and other methods which were equivalent to Snellen acuity eg, HOTV testing).

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)<5 years0.25 logMarStandard Error 0.17
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)5 to <18 years0.01 logMarStandard Error 0.02
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)<5 years-0.07 logMarStandard Error 0.09
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)5 to <18 years0.04 logMarStandard Error 0.04
Comparison: \<5 yearsp-value: 0.112695% CI: [-0.09, 0.74]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 yearsp-value: 0.48495% CI: [-0.12, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)

Central corneal thickness was measured using a calibrated pachymeter, preferably an ultrasonic pachymeter.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)<5 years-8.67 MicrometerStandard Error 11.51
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)5 to <18 years5.30 MicrometerStandard Error 2.75
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)<5 years-5.99 MicrometerStandard Error 10.27
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)5 to <18 years6.17 MicrometerStandard Error 4.01
Comparison: \<5 yearsp-value: 0.864395% CI: [-34.3, 28.94]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 yearsp-value: 0.859195% CI: [-10.54, 8.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)

The horizontal corneal diameter was measured along the horizontal meridians. Diameter was measured using either a series of transparent plates with holes of different diameters in quarter-millimeter increments or with calibrated calipers compared against a ruler. When using calipers, the corneal diameter measurement was taken from limbus to a similar point 180° away at the opposite limbus. When not examining the children with anesthesia, it was recommended to use a tape measure across the head while measuring horizontal corneal diameter by photographic method.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)<5 years0.33 mmStandard Error 0.22
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)5 to <18 years0.08 mmStandard Error 0.12
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)<5 years0.37 mmStandard Error 0.19
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)5 to <18 years0.05 mmStandard Error 0.16
Comparison: \<5 yearsp-value: 0.90295% CI: [-0.63, 0.56]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 yearsp-value: 0.882695% CI: [-0.37, 0.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP was preferably measured using 1 of 3 applanation-contact methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen® (tonometry). iCare® rebound tonometer was also allowed if it was used consistently throughout the study.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)<5 years-1.01 mmHgStandard Error 0.94
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)5 to <18 years, IOP <21mmHg at Baseline1.52 mmHgStandard Error 0.43
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)5 to <18 years, IOP ≥21mmHg at Baseline-4.26 mmHgStandard Error 1.22
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)<5 years0.61 mmHgStandard Error 0.78
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)5 to <18 years, IOP <21mmHg at Baseline1.62 mmHgStandard Error 0.61
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)5 to <18 years, IOP ≥21mmHg at Baseline2.40 mmHgStandard Error 1.99
Comparison: \<5 yearsp-value: 0.200395% CI: [-4.13, 0.89]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 years (IOP \<21mmHg at Baseline)p-value: 0.89495% CI: [-1.59, 1.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 years (IOP ≥21mmHg at Baseline)p-value: 0.018495% CI: [-11.95, -1.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)

The longest eyelash (mm) measured by caliper or ruler was recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)<5 years1.14 mmStandard Error 0.4
Latanoprost GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)5 to <18 years0.44 mmStandard Error 0.19
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)<5 years0.53 mmStandard Error 0.33
Non Prostaglandin GroupChange From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)5 to <18 years0.65 mmStandard Error 0.26
Comparison: \<5 yearsp-value: 0.243795% CI: [-0.43, 1.65]ANCOVA
Comparison: 5 to \<18 yearsp-value: 0.519995% CI: [-0.85, 0.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Conjunctival/Ocular Hyperemia

Conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by slit-lamp examination. When slit-lamp examination is not possible due to subject cooperation, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used to assess this parameter. Conjunctival hyperemia was assessed and graded by ophthalmologist at baseline and follow-up visits from grades 0-3 and is as follows: 0 = None, Normal: few vessels of palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva easily observed 1. = Mild, Reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva 2. = Moderate, Bright reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva 3. = Severe, Deep, bright, and diffuse reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupConjunctival/Ocular Hyperemia6 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupConjunctival/Ocular Hyperemia1 Participants
p-value: 0.241395% CI: [-10.49, 19.36]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Cup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc Ratios

The cup/disc ratio was recorded horizontally and vertically for each examination, and reported in 0.1 increments.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupCup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc Ratios1 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupCup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc Ratios0 Participants
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-13.97, 15.9]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Eyelash Darkening/Thickening

Changes from baseline in eyelash darkening/thickening/lengthening were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupEyelash Darkening/Thickening3 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupEyelash Darkening/Thickening1 Participants
p-value: 0.641495% CI: [-13.39, 16.48]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Iris Color Darkening

Changes from baseline in iris color were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupIris Color Darkening4 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupIris Color Darkening2 Participants
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-13.78, 16.09]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Localized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and Choroid

Changes from baseline in localized pigmentation (nevi and freckles) of the conjunctiva, iris and choroid were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupLocalized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and Choroid3 Participants 0.17
Non Prostaglandin GroupLocalized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and Choroid3 Participants 0.09
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at Baseline

Fundoscopy was performed after dilation of the pupils (eg, 1 % tropicamide or cyclopentolate and 2 ½ % phenylephrine, or a clinically- appropriate dose according to the clinician's standard care of each particular patient). The examination included an evaluation of the vitreous body, retina (including the macula), and optic nerve head. The fundoscopy e-CRF was completed only at baseline because the investigators were required to perform slit lamp, direct or indirect ophthalmoscopy at each visit and report any AEs observed which included the vitreous, retina and optic nerve.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineVitreous body3 Participants
Latanoprost GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineOptic nerve head43 Participants
Latanoprost GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineRetina macula choroid12 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineVitreous body1 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineOptic nerve head29 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at BaselineRetina macula choroid1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment Biomicroscopy

Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (mounted or hand-held) without fluorescein and without dilation of the pupil was performed. When slit-lamp examination was not possible, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used. At each scheduled visit, deposition of pigment on the corneal endothelial layer or the lens capsule or any abnormalities of the lids, conjunctivae, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, or lens was examined.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Latanoprost GroupNumber of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment Biomicroscopy0 Participants 0.17
Non Prostaglandin GroupNumber of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment Biomicroscopy0 Participants 0.09
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive Error

The refractive error \[cycloplegic where appropriate (eg, those unable to cooperate with manifest refraction)\] were determined at the baseline visit and assessed at the following visits.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive Error8 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive Error2 Participants
Secondary

Visual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects.

A visual field examination was performed for those patients who can cooperate automated perimetry utilizing a threshold program. All visual fields was conducted utilizing the standard white background with a Goldmann size III white stimulus. For those patients who can not perform formal visual field testing, then field to confrontation test was used for younger, non-verbal children, central, steady and maintains fixation was used.

Time frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Population: The Full Analysis population included all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Latanoprost GroupVisual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects.1 Participants
Non Prostaglandin GroupVisual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects.1 Participants
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-15.32, 14.55]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026