Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy of Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, and Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of SBP in Patients With LC

Comparison of Efficacy of Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, and Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01265173
Enrollment
261
Registered
2010-12-23
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2020-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis, SBP

Keywords

SBP, liver cirrhosis, antibiotics

Brief summary

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis. Mainstay of treatment for SBP is use of proper antibiotics. Although, several antibiotics including cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ciprofloxacin are being used, it is unclear which drug is most effective. Our aim of study is to compare the efficacy of the three current antibiotics for the treatment of SBP in patients with liver cirrhosis. The primary hypothesis is that the efficacy of all the antibiotics will not significantly different. This is non-inferiority trial.

Detailed description

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis. Mainstay of treatment for SBP is use of proper antibiotics. Although, several antibiotics including cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ciprofloxacin are being used, it is unclear which drug is most effective. Our aim of study is to compare the efficacy of the three current antibiotics for the treatment of SBP in patients with liver cirrhosis. The primary hypothesis is that the efficacy of all the antibiotics will not significantly different. The expected success rates (infection resolution rates) are 83%, 87%, and 78% for cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin. This is non-inferiority trial. The level of significance is 5%. The power of this stuy is 80%. Non-inferiority margin is 15%. Therefore 87 patients for each group are needed.

Interventions

DRUGCefotaxime

3 g

DRUGCeftriaxone

2 g

DRUGCiprofloxacin

400 mg

Sponsors

Korea University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Liver cirrhosis patients with ascites 2. Ascitic fluid PMN cell count \>250/mm3 3. Age: 16\ 70 years old

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergic to 3rd generation cephalosporin or quinolone 2. Antibiotics within 2 weeks 3. Open abdominal surgery within 4 weeks 4. Evidence of 2ndary peritonitis, intrabdominal hemorrhage, pancreatitis, Tb peritonitis, or peritoneal carcinomatosis 5. HCC with portal vein thrombosis 6. Pregnant woman 7. HIV positive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection resolution rates within 5 days of treatment5 days (120 hours)PMN \< 250/mm3 from ascitic fluid

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality & recurrence rates within 1 month1 monthMortality

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026