Skip to content

The Effects of Topical Calcium Glycerophosphate on Surgical Wound Healing and Residual Scarring

A Randomized, Single Blind, Comparative, Controlled Study On The Effects Of Topical Calcium Glycerophosphate On Surgical Wound Healing And Residual Scarring In Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01264588
Acronym
TOPCGP-2008
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-12-22
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2010-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Scarring, Wound Healing

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether topical application of calcium glycerophosphate will result in superior wound appearance and scar minimization.

Interventions

OTHERTopical calcium glycerophosphate lotion

2g once daily for 6 weeks (post-op day 3 thru 42)

Sponsors

Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
CollaboratorOTHER
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Cyberderm Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bacharach Institute for Rehabilitation, Pomona, NJ
CollaboratorOTHER
AkPharma Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent must be obtained * 45-75 years of age * Scheduled for bilateral knee replacement surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Employee or immediate family of either AkPharma or employee or immediate family of investigator or site personnel * Pregnant or breast feeding Known allergy or hypersensitivity to calcium or phosphorus supplements * Diagnosed with type I or type II diabetes mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of surgical wound appearancePost-Op Day: 3 (baseline), 7, 14, 42, 70, 98, 180, 365Digital photographs as objective measurements are taken at each time point, and evaluated by an Expert Grader, blinded as to treatment vs. control, for any differences in the time required for wound closure and/ or scar minimization between treated and untreated groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of visible erythema/ inflammationPost-Op Day: 3 (baseline), 7, 14, 42, 70, 98, 180, 365Digital photographs as objective measurements are taken at each time point, and evaluated by an Expert Grader, blinded as to treatment vs. control, for any differences in reduction of visible erythema/ inflammation between treated and untreated groups.
Scar minimization or preventionPost-Op Day: 3 (baseline), 7, 14, 42, 70, 98, 180, 365Digital photographs as objective measurements are taken at each time point, and evaluated by an Expert Grader, blinded as to treatment vs. control, for any differences in scar appearance between treated and untreated groups.
Incision/ scar pain and sensitivityPost-Op Day: 3 (baseline), 7, 14, 42, 70, 98, 180, 365Subjects are asked to rate their pain at the site of incision for each knee, using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). The pain evaluations are recorded on a pain diary sheet provided at each time point.
Range of motionPost-Op Day: 3 (baseline), 7, 42, 180, 365Range of motion (both flexion and extension) is evaluated using standard goniometric methods.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026