Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of 24-Week Versus 48-Week Courses of Peginterferon Plus Ribavirin for HCV Genotype-6 Patients

A Randomized Trial of 24-Week Versus 48-Week Courses of Peginterferon Plus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01263860
Enrollment
242
Registered
2010-12-21
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2014-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis C

Brief summary

Patients with HCV genotype 6 infection who have a rapid virological response to treatment are randomised to either 24 or 48 weeks HCV treatment. Our hypothesis is that there is no important difference in effect between the two treatment effect.

Detailed description

High rate of infection of Hepatitis C Virus(HCV) Genotype 6 was recently confirmed in Southern China. Recent study implied chronic hepatitis C genotype 6 responds better to the 48-week treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin than genotype 1. Approximately 75.7% obtain sustained virological response (HCV RNA undetectable 24 weeks after treatment) to this approach. However, the treatment is associated with many and sometimes serious side effects. In addition, the treatment is costly also in economical terms. Shorter treatment for chronic hepatitis C genotype 6 is necessary to be assessed. In this randomised,open label,multicenter phase 3 trial with active controls patients are treated with pegylated interferon alfa 2a (180ug/week)and ribavirin(800-1200mg based on weight)for 4 weeks. Those who are HCV RNA negative at week 4 (\<50 IU; Cobas Amplicor Monitor Test, Roche Diagnostic) are defined as rapid virological responders and randomised to either an additional 20 or 44 weeks combination treatment. Patients who are HCV RNA positive are all treated for 44 more weeks. The endpoint is sustained virological response defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after end of treatment. Our hypothesis is that there is no important difference in the effect in the two groups. This is a non-inferiority trial. The smallest difference considered to be clinically important is 15%. Thus to state non-inferiority the 95% confidence interval of the observed difference between the groups shall not overlap 10%. Both intention to treat and and per protocol analyses will be published. Conclusion will be conservative and based on the analysis who detect the biggest difference.

Interventions

patients receive a dose of 180 µg of PEGASYS once a week for 24 weeks

DRUGRibavirin

patients receive a dose 800 to 1200 mg of ribavirin once a day(according to weight) for 24 weeks

Sponsors

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HCV RNA is positive * Genotype 6 * Treatment naive * Raised ALT

Exclusion criteria

* Active substance abuse * Poorly controlled psychiatric disease * HBsAg positive * Anti-HIV positive * Suffering from other significant concurrent medical conditions including chronic liver diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained virological response (SVR)24 weeks after the end of treatmentUndetectable HCVRNA in serum(\<15IU/ml) 24 weeks after the end of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in health related quality as measured by short from 36 (SF-36) from baseline to 24 weeks after the end of treatment24 weeks after the end of treatment
Sick leave in patients treated for 24 or 48 weeks treatment48 weeks

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026