Skip to content

Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy

Prospective Randomized Trial on Surgical Treatment of Grade 3 Hemorrhoids: Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Doppler-guided Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation and Anopexy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01263431
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-12-20
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2015-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Third Degree Hemorrhoids

Keywords

Hemorrhoidectomy, haemorrhoidal dearterialisation, anopexy

Brief summary

Aim of the study is to compare short term results of 2 surgical treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease, namely: pain and postoperative morbidity,complications and effectiveness within 30 days, re-starting daily and working activity, patients' satisfaction

Detailed description

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is burdened by severe postoperative pain. For this reason less painful treatments have been developed, such as Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled anopexy. Both techniques seem to be safe, causing little postoperative pain. A combination of the two techniques could possibly treat both bleeding and prolapse with minimal discomfort

Interventions

PROCEDUREHemorrhoidectomy

Each of the main haemorrhoid is dissected and the apex is ligated and then cut, near to the dentate line

PROCEDUREHemorrhoidal dearterialization

A special instrument (THD, G.F., Medical Division, Correggio, Italy )with an incorporated Doppler probe is used to detected the six terminal branches of the superior rectal artery which are ligated above the dentate line, then a running suture is performed in order to obtain a mucopexy

Sponsors

Scientific Institute San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-80, candidate to surgery for 3rd degree hemorrhoids

Exclusion criteria

* Previous anal surgery or pelvic radiotherapy * Fecal incontinence or obstructed defecation * IBD, IBS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative pain1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative morbidity30 days
resumption of working activity30 days
patient's satisfaction30 days
Relapse24 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026