Skip to content

Randomized Evaluation of Patients With Stable Angina Comparing Diagnostic Examinations

ACRIN-4701 RESCUE: Randomized Evaluation of Patients With Stable Angina Comparing Utilization of Diagnostic Examinations

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01262625
Acronym
RESCUE
Enrollment
1050
Registered
2010-12-17
Start date
2011-05-20
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2023-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina Equivalent, Chest Pain, Coronary Artery Disease, Stable Angina Pectoris, CCS Class I to III

Keywords

stable angina, recurrent chest pain, chest pain, angina equivalent, diagnosis, coronary artery disease

Brief summary

This randomized, controlled, diagnostic, multicenter trial will compare two diagnostic imaging pathways--coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)--to determine the incidence of major adverse coronary events (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac-related death, and cross-over to revascularization. CCTA may be used to direct patients with symptoms of stable angina or angina equivalent to optimal medical therapy (OMT). The use of CCTA as a diagnostic tool for angina symptoms will be associated with no increase in MACE or revascularization, decreased cost, reduced risks (e.g., less radiation exposure), additional insights into alternate explanations of chest pain, and increased cost-effectiveness in comparison with use of SPECT MPI/invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Detailed description

The Randomized Evaluation of Patients with Stable Angina Comparing Utilization of Diagnostic Examinations (RESCUE) is a multi-center randomized, controlled trial responding to the need for comparative analysis of these imaging technologies and the role of OMT in clinical care. A total of 4300 patients will be randomized to CCTA or SPECT MPI/ICA for diagnostic assessment of angina at up to 80 institutions internationally. This study builds on the results of the COURAGE trial by comparing CCTA and SPECT MPI/ICA integrated into a care paradigm featuring initial treatment with OMT for patients diagnosed using computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) without significant disease in the left main coronary artery. Participants will be followed for a composite endpoint of MACE and cross-over to revascularization over a follow-up period up to two years (two to six time points depending on diagnostic results and time of enrollment into the trial). The primary endpoint of the study is a combined endpoint of occurrence of MACE and revascularization. We will calculate differences in the combined MACE/revascularization endpoint between the CCTA and SPECT MPI/ICA arms. Participant outcomes will be assessed by age, gender, comorbidity, and angina classification class at presentation. Several comparative-effectiveness analyses will be performed. We hypothesize that the CCTA arm will be associated with no increase in MACE or revascularization, decreased cost, reduced risks (e.g., less radiation exposure), additional insights into or alternate explanations of chest pain, and increased cost-effectiveness in comparison with SPECT MPI/ICA. Findings are expected to result in validation of an evolving new standard of care for patients with stable angina that takes advantage of CCTA and OMT to more cost-effectively drive appropriate care while reducing the need for invasive diagnosis and increased radiation exposure with SPECT MPI/ICA.

Interventions

DEVICECCTA

Complete diagnostic CCTA per protocol specifications.

DEVICESPECT MPI/ICA

Perform SPECT MPI per institutional standard practice; diagnostic ICA will be performed only as indicated per protocol.

Sponsors

American College of Radiology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This randomized, controlled, diagnostic, multicenter trial will follow participants at 6-month intervals for up to 24 months to determine the incidence of MACE, defined as myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac-related death, and cross-over to revascularization.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to provide a written informed consent; * 40 years or older; * Presentation with symptoms of stable angina (CCS Class I to III) or angina equivalent with or without known CAD; * Planned non-invasive imaging for CAD diagnosis; * Able to tolerate CCTA or SPECT MPI per randomization as required by protocol, to be performed at an ACRIN-qualified facility with a RESCUE-qualified scanner.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior revascularization; * Not suitable to undergo CT with an iodinated contrast agent: * Known allergy-like reaction to contrast media as defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR) (see www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality\_safety/contrast\_manual.aspx for reaction definition) or moderate to severe allergic reactions to more than one allergen; * Renal failure, as determined by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on a serum creatinine level obtained within 28 days prior to registration; * Renal insufficiency at the time of enrollment, as determined by GFR 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on a serum creatinine level obtained within 28 days prior to registration, unless permitted by the institution's policy and/or ACR guidance for risk reduction strategies (see www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality\_safety/contrast\_manual.aspx for guidance on contrast selection and pre-treatment strategies); * Atrial fibrillation or significant arrhythmia judged to potentially limit quality of CCTA; * Acute ischemia; * Acute myocardial infarction; * Severe myocardial ischemia: known markedly positive exercise treadmill stress test (ST) \[significant ST segment depressions or hypotensive response during stage I of the Bruce protocol\]; * Unable to suspend respiration for 15 seconds or to follow instructions to do so; * Unstable angina and symptoms refractory to maximal oral and intravenous medical therapy (persistent CCS Class IV); * History of known left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45%; * Pulmonary edema or heart failure unresponsive to standard medical therapy; * Pacemaker; * Valvular heart disease likely to require surgery in the next 18 months; * Congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathy likely to affect prognosis during follow up; * Significant systemic hypertension (blood pressure \> 200/100 mm Hg) unresponsive to medical therapy; * Severe noncardiovascular comorbidity limiting survival (e.g., cancer or other life threatening illness for which the patient is expected to live less than 12 months); * Prior imaging evaluation for this episode of symptoms (e.g., SPECT MPI or CCTA within the previous 72 hours); * BMI \> 40 kg/m2; * Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant (if a female is of childbearing potential-defined as a premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant-a pregnancy test should be done prior to enrollment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)up to 24 Months (depends on time of trial enrollment and funding duration)To compare outcomes of participants with symptoms of stable angina or angina equivalent evaluated with an anatomic imaging strategy using CCTA as initial method of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (Group A) to a combined functional and anatomic imaging strategy of SPECT MPI/ICA (Group B) as a guide to Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) alone. The analysis was conducted from an intent-to-treat perspective

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)1 yearAUC is a unitless measure of performance ranging form 0.5 (guessing) to 1.0 (perfect predictor) that can be thought of a the proportion of correct classifications in a 2-alternative-forced-choice experiment - and for binary outcomes, it is equivalent to the C-statistic. It will be used to evaluate and compare the ability of available prognostic indices and SPECT-MPI % reversible defect size to predict revascularization or MACE using CCTA information: A CCTA Modified Duke index A CCTA index including the 16 individual American Heart Association (AHA) segments A CCTA including the 16 individual AHA segments and clinical data and compare them to the SPECT % reversible defect size results
Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scorebaseline and 12 monthsSF36+SAQ at baseline and to a subset of participants, stratified by diagnostic examination, at 12 months after enrollment to monitor angina symptoms and their impact on Quality of life. The Short Form-36 (SF36) is a 36 item overall health status/Quality of Life collected in 8 domains. Scales are standardized with scores ranging from 0-100. Higher scores= better health status. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a self-administered, 19-item, cardiac disease-related quality-of-life measure collected in 5 domains. scales are standardized with scores ranging from 0-100. Higher scores= better health status. Positive cardiac findings on diagnostic testing are defined as: 1. 50% stenosis on CCTA or un-evaluable left main, or proximal and mid segments of all other epicardial arteries (right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, or left circumflex artery); and 2. 10% reversible defect on SPECT MPI or evidence of Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) accompanied by ECG
The Effectiveness of Each Arm Will be Measured in Terms of Life Years and Quality of Life Years (QALY).Baseline and 1 yearInternational medical records will be used to determine mortality which may not be feasible at all participating international sites. Utilities will be based on Quality of Well Being scores converted from the SF-36 assessments The analysis will be performed assuming a societal perspective and lifetime time horizon

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study opened to enrollment in May 2011 and was closed to enrollment in June 2013 due to resource limitations. The study was designed to enroll and randomize 4300 participants to the 2 study arms, but given the difficulties of recruiting enough patients to fulfill the stringent entry criteria, as well as time constraints for funding (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act award, 3-year cap), only one quarter of the planned sample size could be recruited .

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: CCTA Diagnostic
Participants randomized to diagnostic evaluation using CCTA to determine therapeutic course of action. CCTA: Complete diagnostic CCTA per protocol specifications.
516
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA Diagnostic
Standard-of-care diagnostic assessment using SPECT MPI, possibly followed by diagnostic ICA dependent on SPECT MPI results. SPECT MPI/ICA: Perform SPECT MPI per institutional standard practice; diagnostic ICA will be performed only as indicated per protocol.
531
Total1,047

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Error11
Overall StudySite Closed10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticTotalGroup A: CCTA Diagnostic
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
58 Participants104 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
468 Participants935 Participants467 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants25 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
77 Participants150 Participants73 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
415 Participants815 Participants400 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
244 Participants477 Participants233 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
287 Participants570 Participants283 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 5180 / 532
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5180 / 532
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5180 / 532

Outcome results

Primary

Time-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)

To compare outcomes of participants with symptoms of stable angina or angina equivalent evaluated with an anatomic imaging strategy using CCTA as initial method of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (Group A) to a combined functional and anatomic imaging strategy of SPECT MPI/ICA (Group B) as a guide to Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) alone. The analysis was conducted from an intent-to-treat perspective

Time frame: up to 24 Months (depends on time of trial enrollment and funding duration)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticTime-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)No Event487 Participants
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticTime-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)Event Occurred29 Participants
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticTime-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)No Event504 Participants
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticTime-dependent Rates of the Composite Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: Comprising Cardiac-related Death or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), and Revascularization)Event Occurred27 Participants
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [0.61, 1.75]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Prediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)

AUC is a unitless measure of performance ranging form 0.5 (guessing) to 1.0 (perfect predictor) that can be thought of a the proportion of correct classifications in a 2-alternative-forced-choice experiment - and for binary outcomes, it is equivalent to the C-statistic. It will be used to evaluate and compare the ability of available prognostic indices and SPECT-MPI % reversible defect size to predict revascularization or MACE using CCTA information: A CCTA Modified Duke index A CCTA index including the 16 individual American Heart Association (AHA) segments A CCTA including the 16 individual AHA segments and clinical data and compare them to the SPECT % reversible defect size results

Time frame: 1 year

Population: For the secondary analyses, patients with \<1-year follow-up (defined as \<335 days) were excluded from analysis, as were ineligible patients and patients without the respective randomized scan or with an uninterpretable scan The analysis will compare the the proposed SPECT % reversible defect size vs the a modified Duke Score and the standard CCTA +AHA 16 to predict MACE events.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticPrediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)0.87 unitless
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticPrediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)0.92 unitless
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorPrediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)0.93 unitless
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizePrediction of Response (MACE/Revascularization) at 1 Year Using: Modified Duke Score or CCTA + AHA 16 Predictor/CCTA+AHA 16+Clinical Data Predictor or SPECT% Reversible Defect Size Reported as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC)0.73 unitless
p-value: 0.08DeLong
p-value: 0.02DeLong
Secondary

Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Score

SF36+SAQ at baseline and to a subset of participants, stratified by diagnostic examination, at 12 months after enrollment to monitor angina symptoms and their impact on Quality of life. The Short Form-36 (SF36) is a 36 item overall health status/Quality of Life collected in 8 domains. Scales are standardized with scores ranging from 0-100. Higher scores= better health status. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a self-administered, 19-item, cardiac disease-related quality-of-life measure collected in 5 domains. scales are standardized with scores ranging from 0-100. Higher scores= better health status. Positive cardiac findings on diagnostic testing are defined as: 1. 50% stenosis on CCTA or un-evaluable left main, or proximal and mid segments of all other epicardial arteries (right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, or left circumflex artery); and 2. 10% reversible defect on SPECT MPI or evidence of Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) accompanied by ECG

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: Only cases with and an available screen result and both baseline and 1-year surveys completed are included in this analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: Baseline45.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.11
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Role-physical: Baseline46.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: 1-Year71.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.65
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical component: 1-Year47.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.66
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys Func: Baseline46.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.48
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys comp: Baseline45.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: 1-Year80.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.17
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: Baseline77.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.24
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: 1-Year79.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.16
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: 1-Year87.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.89
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: 1-Year92.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.36
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: Baseline44.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.42
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: 1-Year50.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.82
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: 1-Year47.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.15
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: Baseline67.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.83
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role-physical: 1-Year48.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.28
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: 1-Year50.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.51
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical functioning: 1-Year46.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: Baseline49.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.16
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: Baseline47.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.07
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: 1-Year48.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: Baseline58.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.18
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: Baseline46.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.63
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: Baseline48.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.23
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: 1-Year48.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: Baseline84.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.57
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: Baseline49.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: Baseline47.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.01
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: 1-Year50.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.24
Group A: CCTA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: 1-Year49.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.74
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: Baseline48.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role-physical: 1-Year46.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: 1-Year46.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.16
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: 1-Year46.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.86
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: 1-Year48.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: 1-Year47.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.49
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: 1-Year53.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.45
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: 1-Year46.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.59
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: 1-Year48.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: 1-Year68.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.83
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: 1-Year82.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.26
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: 1-Year92.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.71
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: 1-Year86.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.74
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: 1-Year77.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.77
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys comp: Baseline46.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.69
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys Func: Baseline47.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Role-physical: Baseline46.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: Baseline45.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.72
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: Baseline46.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.51
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: Baseline48.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: Baseline46.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: Baseline47.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: Baseline48.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.12
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: Baseline67.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: Baseline48.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.71
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: Baseline79.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: Baseline85.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.95
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: Baseline59.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.81
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical component: 1-Year46.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Group B: SPECT MPI/ICA DiagnosticShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical functioning: 1-Year47.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: Baseline47.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.36
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: 1-Year46.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.58
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: 1-Year46.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical functioning: 1-Year46.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: Baseline65.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: Baseline54.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.06
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: Baseline47.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.86
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical component: 1-Year47.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.66
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: Baseline40.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.32
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: 1-Year45.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.13
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: 1-Year46.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: 1-Year48.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: 1-Year86.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.46
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: Baseline46.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: Baseline46.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: Baseline74.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.15
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: 1-Year84.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.42
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Role-physical: Baseline45.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.79
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: 1-Year71.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.98
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: 1-Year46.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: 1-Year71.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.64
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: Baseline46.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.94
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: Baseline44.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.16
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: Baseline47.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys comp: Baseline46.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.51
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: 1-Year48.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: 1-Year66.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.39
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role-physical: 1-Year48.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys Func: Baseline46.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9361
Group A: CCTA + AHA 16 + Clinical Data PredictorShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: Baseline85.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.41
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys Func: Baseline46.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.37
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Role-physical: Baseline48.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.07
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: Baseline82.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.91
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: Baseline45.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.65
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: 1-Year52.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: Baseline50.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical functioning: 1-Year51.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.97
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: Baseline49.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.91
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: 1-Year46.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.21
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: Baseline46.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: Baseline62.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.74
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Social functioning: Baseline49.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Vitality: 1-Year53.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.45
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role-physical: 1-Year53.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Role emotional: Baseline48.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental comp: 1-Year53.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: Baseline50.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: Baseline67.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.36
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: General health: 1-Year53.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.64
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: Baseline38.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.41
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Physical component: 1-Year52.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.04
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: 1-Year97.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina stability: 1-Year92.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.32
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Treatment satisfaction: 1-Year97.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Angina frequency: Baseline75.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.81
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Disease perception: 1-Year91.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.61
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSAQ: Physical limitation: 1-Year76.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Bodily pain: 1-Year53.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.14
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF-36: Phys comp: Baseline47.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.19
Group B: SPECT % Reversible Defect SizeShort Form-36 Survey (SF-36v2) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) ScoreSF36: Mental health: 1-Year54.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Secondary

The Effectiveness of Each Arm Will be Measured in Terms of Life Years and Quality of Life Years (QALY).

International medical records will be used to determine mortality which may not be feasible at all participating international sites. Utilities will be based on Quality of Well Being scores converted from the SF-36 assessments The analysis will be performed assuming a societal perspective and lifetime time horizon

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: The study was terminated before data to compute life years was collected SF-36 scores have been reported previously

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026