Skip to content

Carotid Artery Stenting With Cilostazol Addition for Restenosis

Effect of Cilostazol on In-stent Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting; Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Blind-endpoint Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01261234
Acronym
CAS-CARE
Enrollment
707
Registered
2010-12-16
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2019-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In-stent Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting

Keywords

Carotid Artery Disease, Carotid Artery Stenting, In stent restenosis, Cardiovascular event, Intima Media Thickness

Brief summary

CAS-CARE study was conducted to evaluate the inhibitory effect of cilostazol, compared to that of other antiplatelet drugs, on in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients scheduled to undergo CAS. Study design is Multicenter Prospective Ranodomized Controlled Study, rondomized by cilostazol/non-cilostazol group prior to CAS. 900 patients will be enrolled for 2 years and followed 2 years with in-stent restenosis after CAS, evaluated by carotid ultrasound and angiography.

Detailed description

Restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a critical issue. Cilostazol can reduce restenosis after interventions in coronary or femoropopliteal arteries. The investigators confirmed and published periprocedural cilostazol administration reduced incidences of in-stent restenosis (ISR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) after CAS, retrospectively. CAS-CARE study is Multicenter Prospective Ranodomized Controlled Study. Patients, scheduled for CAS within 30 days, 50% or more symptomatic carotid stenosis or 80% or more asymptomatic carotid stenosis, will enroll and randomize by cilostazol/non-cilostazol group. 900 patients will be enrolled for 2 years and followed 2 years with in-stent restenosis after CAS, evaluated by carotid ultrasound and angiography. And, evaluate cardiovascular events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic events in periprocedural period and followed period. In this study, ISR is diagnosed by ultrasound and DSA/CTA. Equivalence of CTA to ultrasound will be studied.

Interventions

DRUGCilostazol or Non-Cilostazol

Cilostazol group administrate 100-200mg/day per oral, unrestricted use of other antiplatelet agents and concomitant drugs.

Sponsors

Chiba University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nagoya University
CollaboratorOTHER
Mie University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wakayama Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kyoto University
CollaboratorOTHER
Osaka University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kobe University
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation
CollaboratorOTHER
Okayama University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yamaguchi University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fukuoka University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nagasaki University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kobe City General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 50% or more symptomatic carotid artery stenosis or 80% or more asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis * scheduled for carotid artery stenting within 30 days * 45 or more years-old and less than 80 years old * antiplatelet agents can be administratered orally * follow-up is anticipated possible for 2 years after CAS * self-supporoted in daily activities (modified Rankin Scale 2 or less) * patients who have given informed consent to participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* received endovascular interevention * scheduled for bilateral carotid intervention * aortitis or cvasculitis * congessive heart failure * ischemic stroke within 48 hours * hemorrhagic stroke within 90 days * renal failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence or absence of in-stent restenosis within 2 years after CAS and time to occurrence2 yearsDifinition of endpoint is 50% or more in-stent restenosis detected by carotid ultrasound or angiopraphy. In cases restenosis does not occur, the final observation point will be used as the final evaluation point.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis, or retreatment within 2 years2 yearsIn-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis detected by ultrasound or CTA/DSA, or retreatment of stented artery within 2 years
hemorrhagic event within 2 years2 yearshemorrhagic stroke, major hemorrhage required 2 unit or more transfusion
stroke within 2 years2 yearsany ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Cardiovascular event, death, hemorrhagic event, in-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis, or retreatment of stented artery within 2 yrs2 yearsAny events, including death, cardiovascular event(stroke, myocardial infarction), hemorrhagic event, in-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis, retreatment of stented artery, within 2 years
Severe in-stent restenosis within 2 yrs2 yeras70% or more in-stent restenosis, diagnosed by ultrasound or DSA/CTA,
Change from baseline in max-IMT in both common carotid arteries2 yearsIntima-Media thickness of common carotid artery measured by ultrasound
In-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis, or retreatment of stented artery, cardiovascular event, or death from any cause within 30 days30 daysAny peri-procedural events; in-stent restenosis, new out-stent stenosis, or retreatment of stented artery, cardiovascular event(stroke, myocardial infarction), or death from any cause

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026