Skip to content

Open Appendectomy Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy

The Outcomes of Various Appendectomy Techniques in a High-volume Center.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01260064
Enrollment
150
Registered
2010-12-15
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2011-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Keywords

Appendicitis, Open appendectomy, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Endoclip, Intracorporeal suture, Quality-of-life

Brief summary

1\. Laparoscopic appendectomy may not be a superior procedure when compared with open appendectomy; 2. Various modifications in laparoscopic appendectomy procedure may reduce the technical diffuculty and overall costs.

Detailed description

The study will be a prospective randomized clinical trial. Totally 150 patients who are diagnosed to have acute appendicitis will be randomly divided into 3 equal groups (n=50 for each group). First group will have traditional open appendectomy procedure; second group will have laparoscopic appendectomy procedure in which appendiceal stump is secured by metal endoclips; and third group will have laparoscopic appendectomy procedure in which appendiceal stump is secured by intracorporeal suture ligation. The preoperative parameters that will be obtained for all patients are: detailed information for communication, patient history, age, gender, the presence of spesific symptoms (nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, right lower quadrant pain), the presence of clinical signs, laboratory findings, and radiological findings. The peroperative parameters that will be recorded are: operative time, the type and the length of incisions, the number of trocars, operative findings, details of laparoscopic technique, generic name of prophylactic antibiotic, and the presence of additional findings. All of the patients will undergo a clinical evaluation by attending surgeon on the 5th, the 15th, and the 30th postoperative day. The postoperative clinical evaluation will include the examination of the patient for surgical site infection and other wound complications, and the performance of a spesific quality-of-life index questionnaire. In the end of the study, all parameters and quality-of-life scores will undergo statistical analysis.

Interventions

The subjects will have traditional open appendectomy procedure.

PROCEDURELaparoscopic appendectomy with metal endoclips

The subjects will have laparoscopic appendectomy in which the appendiceal stump is secured by metal endoclips.

PROCEDURELaparoscopic appendectomy with suture ligation

The subjects will have laparoscopic appendectomy in which the appendiceal stump is secured by intracorporeal suture ligation.

Sponsors

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Exclusion criteria

* The patients who are not volunteered to join the study * The patients who are diagnosed to have peroperative or histopathological pathology other than acute appendicitis * The patients who have additional pathologies accompanying acute appendicitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life.1 monthQuality of life after various appendectomy procedures will be measured by a spesific quality-of-life index.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost-effectivity1 monthThe study will reveal which procedure for appendectomy is the most cost-effective one.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026