Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended Release in Adults With Childhood-onset Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

A 40-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Efficacy and Safety Study of Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Childhood-onset ADHD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01259492
Enrollment
725
Registered
2010-12-14
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2014-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

Attention Deficit /Hyperactivity Disorder, hyperactivity

Brief summary

This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release compared to placebo in adult patients with childhood-onset attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

DRUGRitalin LA 20 mg

Ritalin LA (a racemic mixture of d- and l-thre-Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (MPH), extended release hard capsules) taken orally once daily in doses of 40, 60, or 80 mg.

DRUGRitalin LA 30 mg

Ritalin LA (a racemic mixture of d- and l-thre-Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (MPH), extended release hard capsules) taken orally once daily in doses of 60, or 80 mg.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) which started in childhood 2. Female patients of childbearing potential must be practicing an acceptable method of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2 or more than 35 kg/m2 2. History of alcohol or substance abuse within the last six months. 3. History of seizures or use of anticonvulsant medication. 4. Any psychiatric condition that requires medication or may interfere with study participation. 5. Pre-existing cardiovascular disorders including severe hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infraction, etc. 6. Significant respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological or oncologic disorder 7. Diagnosis of glaucoma, hyperthyroidism, pheochromocytoma 8. Diagnosis or family history of Tourette's syndrome 9. Pre-existing cerebrovascular disorders such as cerebral aneurysm, vascular abnormalities including vasculitis or stroke Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) total score consists of 18 items directly adapted from the ADHD symptom list according to the DSM-IV. The DSM-IV ADHD RS total score was calculated as the sum of the Inattentive and the Hyperactive-Impulsive subscores. The 18 items are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). The total score ranges from 0(least symptomatic) to 72 (most symptomatic). Decrease in the DSM-IV ADHD RS total score indicates improvement, therefore a greater decrease (change at Final Visit compared to baseline) indicates a greater improvement in ADHD symptoms. 30% improvement: 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 1 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization(visit 2))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2) \<= - 30%.
Change From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)SDS, a 5-self-rated questionnaire to measure the extent a pt's disability due to an illness/health problem interferes with work/school, social life/leisure, family life/home. First 3 items, pts are asked how their symptoms disrupted their reg. activities over the past 7d in ea. using a scale from 0(not at all)-10(extremely) Ea. subscale(work disability, social life disability, family life disability) can be scored independently or combined into a total score(sum of the non-missing responses for items 1-3)from 0-30,higher scores indicate significant functional impairmt. Subscale scores \>5 suggest impairment in that subscale area. Final 2 items ask pts about the # of days their symptoms caused them to miss school/work and # of days their symptoms caused them to be underproductive at school/work.(These items were not included in the total score.) Before responding to SDS items 1-3, pts were verbally instructed to recall the past 7d, items 4-5 refer to the last week w/in the item wording.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) and Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Week 40Treatment failure is defined as: 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 3 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at re-randomization (visit 13))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at re-randomization (visit 13) \>= 30% AND 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 3 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2) \> - 30%. The ADHD-RS-IV is an 180item clinician rated scale to assess ADHD by DSM-IV-TR, defined criteria using symptom terminology appropriate for the adult population. Each item pertains to inattention (odd-numbered) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (even-numbered) and is scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). A total added score can range from 0-54

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)CGI-S assesses the patient's current illness state. CGI-S consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = normal, not at all ill , 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients
Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)The ADHD-RS-IV is an 180 item clinician rated scale to assess ADHD by DSM-IV-TR, defined criteria using symptom terminology appropriate for the adult population. Each item pertains to inattention (odd-numbered) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (even-numbered) and is scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). A total added score can range from 0-54.
Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a self-rating scale designed to assess the extent to which the patient's work social life/leisure activities and home life are impaired by his or her symptoms. The scale generates 4 scores: a work disability score, a social life disability score, a family life disability score and a total score. To get a total score the 3 individual scores (work: social life: family life) are totaled. The maximum possible score is 30 The higher the score, the more impaired a patient's work, social life, family life is.
Percentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1Baseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)On the CGI-I scale, a lower score reflects greater improvement between 1 and 3, a score of 4 is no change, scores higher than 4 reflect worsening. The CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = Very much improved to 7 =Very much worse. Improvement on the CGI-I scale is defined as a visit rating of 1 very much improved or 2 much improved on the CGI-I scale. Percentage has been calculated from the evaluable patients (N) as Percentage = n/N \* 100.
Number of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)CGI-S assesses the patient's current illness state. CGI-S consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = normal, not at all ill , 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients
Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)CAARS is an instrument to assess ADHD symptoms and behaviors in adults. This study utilizes the Observer Short Version (CAARS-O: S), consisting of 26 items and 6 subscales: Inattention/Memory Problems, Hyperactivity/Restlessness, Impulsivity/Emotional Lability, Problems with Self-Concept, ADHD Index (to distinguish ADHD adults from non-clinical adults), and Inconsistency Index (to identify random or careless responding) and is rated by someone close to the patient in their daily life such as a spouse, friend, or coworker. The observer is asked to notice the patient carefully and decide how much or how frequently each of the 26 items of the scale describes the patient recently. The response to every question in increasing order of severity is not at all, never = 0; Just a little, once in a while = 1; Pretty much, often = 2; Very much, very frequently = 3. The total score combined from all the 26 items ranges from 0 to 88.
Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)The ASRS is a self-rating scale designed to assess ADHD symptoms in adults and is now part of the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview. It consists of 18 items written to reflect the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD and are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). The total score ranges from 0 to 72.
Number of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by TreatmentBaseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)On the CGI-I scale, a lower score reflects greater improvement between 1 and 3, a score of 4 is no change, scores higher than 4 reflect worsening. The CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = Very much improved to 7 =Very much worse. Improvement on the CGI-I scale is defined as a visit rating of 1 very much improved or 2 much improved on the CGI-I scale.
Change From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)DSM-IV ADHD RS consists of 18 items directly adapted from the ADHD symptom list according to the DSM-IV. The SDS is a five-item, self-rated questionnaire that has been used widely in clinical trials and observational studies. CAARS-O: S consists of 26 items and 6 subscales: Inattention/Memory Problems, Hyperactivity/Restlessness, Impulsivity/Emotional Lability, Problems with Self-Concept, ADHD Index, and Inconsistency Index and is rated by someone close to the patient in their daily life such as a spouse, friend, or coworker. The Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) is a self-rating scale designed to assess Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms. The 18 items are written to reflect the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD and are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often).
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)CGI-I assesses the overall change of illness relative to baseline. CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change from baseline, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse 7 = very much worse

Countries

Belgium, Colombia, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ritalin LA 40 mg
In period 1 patients were given Ritalin LA 20 mg and up titrated to 40 mg at week 2, continued in same dose till week 9. Period 2- The dose of study medication was re-titrated for all patients (including those in the Placebo arm during Period 1) starting at 20 mg/day Ritalin LA and increased at weekly intervals in increments of 20 mg/day until reaching the patient's optimal dose 40 mg. Optimal dose was defined as the dose at which the investigator considered an optimal balance between control of symptoms and side effects was maintained for a period of at least one week prior to Week 14. In period 3, patients were re- randomized to either their optimal dose of medication (40, 60, or 80 mg/day) or Placebo from beginning of week 15 to end of week 40.
181
Ritalin LA 60 mg
In period 1 patients were given Ritalin LA 20 mg and up titrated to 40 mg at week 2 and to 60 mg at week 3. Period 2- The dose of study medication was re-titrated for all patients (including those in the Placebo arm during Period 1) starting at 20 mg/day Ritalin LA and increased at weekly intervals in increments of 20 mg/day until reaching the patient's optimal dose 60 mg. Optimal dose was defined as the dose at which the investigator considered an optimal balance between control of symptoms and side effects was maintained for a period of at least one week prior to Week 14.In period 3, patients were re- randomized to either their optimal dose of medication (40, 60, or 80 mg/day) or Placebo from beginning of week 15 to end of week 40.
182
Ritalin LA 80 mg
In period 1 patients were given Ritalin LA 20 mg and up titrated to 40 mg at week 2 and to 60 mg at week 3 and to 80 mg at week 4. Period 2- The dose of study medication was re-titrated for all patients (including those in the Placebo arm during Period 1) starting at 20 mg/day Ritalin LA and increased at weekly intervals in increments of 20 mg/day until reaching the patient's optimal dose 60 mg. Optimal dose was defined as the dose at which the investigator considered an optimal balance between control of symptoms and side effects was maintained for a period of at least one week prior to Week 14. In period 3, patients were re- randomized to either their optimal dose of medication (40, 60, or 80 mg/day) or Placebo from beginning of week 15 to end of week 40.
181
Placebo
Period 1- Placebo controlled Period 2 - The dose of study medication was re-titrated for all patients (including those in the Placebo arm during Period 1) starting at 20 mg/day Ritalin LA and increased at weekly intervals in increments of 20 mg/day until reaching the patient's optimal dose (40, 60 or 80 mg). In period 3, patients were re- randomized to either their optimal dose of medication (40, 60, or 80 mg/day) or Placebo from beginning of week 15 to end of week 40.
181
Total725

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Administrative Problems0112
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Adverse Event1318263
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy22411
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up4634
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Protocol Violation5631
Period 1 (9 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject5867
Period 2 (Week 10 to Week 14)Adverse Event3478
Period 2 (Week 10 to Week 14)Lack of Efficacy137713
Period 2 (Week 10 to Week 14)Lost to Follow-up3313
Period 2 (Week 10 to Week 14)Protocol Violation0210
Period 2 (Week 10 to Week 14)Withdrawal by Subject6284
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Abnormal Lab value(s)0001
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Abnormal Test Procedure Result(s)0010
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Administrative Problems0010
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Adverse Event51165
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Lack of Efficacy28422962
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Lost to Follow-up3463
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Patient no longer requires study drug1000
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Protocol Violation5637
Period 3 (Week 15 to End of Week 40)Withdrawal by Subject12643

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRitalin LA 40 mgRitalin LA 60 mgRitalin LA 80 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
18-30
72 Participants78 Participants71 Participants66 Participants287 Participants
Age, Customized
31-40
19 Participants45 Participants40 Participants38 Participants162 Participants
Age, Customized
41-50
56 Participants41 Participants45 Participants31 Participants149 Participants
Age, Customized
51-60
10 Participants14 Participants13 Participants30 Participants71 Participants
Gender
Female
60 Participants58 Participants46 Participants52 Participants216 Participants
Gender
Male
54 Participants74 Participants74 Participants71 Participants273 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants77 Participants86 Participants80 Participants330 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
94 Participants105 Participants95 Participants101 Participants395 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
517 / 695104 / 275
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 6954 / 275

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by Treatment

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) total score consists of 18 items directly adapted from the ADHD symptom list according to the DSM-IV. The DSM-IV ADHD RS total score was calculated as the sum of the Inattentive and the Hyperactive-Impulsive subscores. The 18 items are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). The total score ranges from 0(least symptomatic) to 72 (most symptomatic). Decrease in the DSM-IV ADHD RS total score indicates improvement, therefore a greater decrease (change at Final Visit compared to baseline) indicates a greater improvement in ADHD symptoms. 30% improvement: 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 1 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization(visit 2))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2) \<= - 30%.

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 1 (FAS P1) - all randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 1. Patients will be assigned to their randomized fixed dose. Patients with both baseline and post-baseline (end of week 9) assessments were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by Treatment16.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.18
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by Treatment14.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.12
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by Treatment16.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline of Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (DSM-IV ADHD RS) Total Score by Treatment9.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.05
Primary

Change From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by Treatment

SDS, a 5-self-rated questionnaire to measure the extent a pt's disability due to an illness/health problem interferes with work/school, social life/leisure, family life/home. First 3 items, pts are asked how their symptoms disrupted their reg. activities over the past 7d in ea. using a scale from 0(not at all)-10(extremely) Ea. subscale(work disability, social life disability, family life disability) can be scored independently or combined into a total score(sum of the non-missing responses for items 1-3)from 0-30,higher scores indicate significant functional impairmt. Subscale scores \>5 suggest impairment in that subscale area. Final 2 items ask pts about the # of days their symptoms caused them to miss school/work and # of days their symptoms caused them to be underproductive at school/work.(These items were not included in the total score.) Before responding to SDS items 1-3, pts were verbally instructed to recall the past 7d, items 4-5 refer to the last week w/in the item wording.

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 1 (FAS P1) - all randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 1. Patients will be assigned to their randomized fixed dose. Patients with both baseline and post-baseline (end of week 9) assessments were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by Treatment6.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.54
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by Treatment4.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.08
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by Treatment6.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1 on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score by Treatment2.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.47
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3

Treatment failure is defined as: 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 3 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at re-randomization (visit 13))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at re-randomization (visit 13) \>= 30% AND 100×(DSM-IV ADHD RS total score during Period 3 - DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2))/DSM-IV ADHD RS total score at randomization (visit 2) \> - 30%. The ADHD-RS-IV is an 180item clinician rated scale to assess ADHD by DSM-IV-TR, defined criteria using symptom terminology appropriate for the adult population. Each item pertains to inattention (odd-numbered) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (even-numbered) and is scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). A total added score can range from 0-54

Time frame: Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) and Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Week 40

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. One patient in Ritalin LA 80mg did not have post baseline 2 measurements and was not included in the categories under without imputation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Treatment failure16.4 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Not treatment failure54.5 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Not treatment failure83.6 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation missing failure status33.6 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Treatment failure11.8 Percentage of participants 7.54
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation missing failure status29.7 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Treatment failure26.6 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Not treatment failure73.4 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Not treatment failure50.0 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Treatment failure20.3 Percentage of participants 7.08
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation missing failure status25.4 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Treatment failure17.5 Percentage of participants 7.31
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Not treatment failure56.1 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Treatment failure20.2 Percentage of participants
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Not treatment failure79.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Treatment failure49.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Not treatment failure31.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation - Treatment failure43.5 Percentage of participants 7.47
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3Without Imputation missing failure status25.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failures During Period 3With Imputation - Not treatment failure50.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)

DSM-IV ADHD RS consists of 18 items directly adapted from the ADHD symptom list according to the DSM-IV. The SDS is a five-item, self-rated questionnaire that has been used widely in clinical trials and observational studies. CAARS-O: S consists of 26 items and 6 subscales: Inattention/Memory Problems, Hyperactivity/Restlessness, Impulsivity/Emotional Lability, Problems with Self-Concept, ADHD Index, and Inconsistency Index and is rated by someone close to the patient in their daily life such as a spouse, friend, or coworker. The Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) is a self-rating scale designed to assess Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms. The 18 items are written to reflect the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD and are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often).

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 2 (FAS P2) - all randomized patients who took one dose of study medication in Period 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)DSM-IV ADHD RS total score n=49424.8 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 8.97
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)SDS total score n=48010.1 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 7.25
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)CAARS-O:S total score n=41115.5 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 15.25
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline 1 in DSM-IVADHD RS Total Score, SDS Total Score, The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Observer Short Version (CAARS-O:S) Total Score and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)ASRS total score n=49023.2 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 14.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by Treatment

The ASRS is a self-rating scale designed to assess ADHD symptoms in adults and is now part of the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview. It consists of 18 items written to reflect the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD and are rated from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). The total score ranges from 0 to 72.

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by Treatment3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.64
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by Treatment3.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.66
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by Treatment3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in ASRS Total Score by Treatment8.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by Treatment

CAARS is an instrument to assess ADHD symptoms and behaviors in adults. This study utilizes the Observer Short Version (CAARS-O: S), consisting of 26 items and 6 subscales: Inattention/Memory Problems, Hyperactivity/Restlessness, Impulsivity/Emotional Lability, Problems with Self-Concept, ADHD Index (to distinguish ADHD adults from non-clinical adults), and Inconsistency Index (to identify random or careless responding) and is rated by someone close to the patient in their daily life such as a spouse, friend, or coworker. The observer is asked to notice the patient carefully and decide how much or how frequently each of the 26 items of the scale describes the patient recently. The response to every question in increasing order of severity is not at all, never = 0; Just a little, once in a while = 1; Pretty much, often = 2; Very much, very frequently = 3. The total score combined from all the 26 items ranges from 0 to 88.

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by Treatment-2.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by Treatment1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by Treatment-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 in Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S:) Total Score by Treatment2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by Treatment

The ADHD-RS-IV is an 180 item clinician rated scale to assess ADHD by DSM-IV-TR, defined criteria using symptom terminology appropriate for the adult population. Each item pertains to inattention (odd-numbered) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (even-numbered) and is scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). A total added score can range from 0-54.

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by Treatment3.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.07
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by Treatment5.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.85
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by Treatment2.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale ADHD RS Total Score by Treatment9.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.95
Secondary

Change From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by Treatment

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a self-rating scale designed to assess the extent to which the patient's work social life/leisure activities and home life are impaired by his or her symptoms. The scale generates 4 scores: a work disability score, a social life disability score, a family life disability score and a total score. To get a total score the 3 individual scores (work: social life: family life) are totaled. The maximum possible score is 30 The higher the score, the more impaired a patient's work, social life, family life is.

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritalin LA 40 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by Treatment2.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Ritalin LA 60 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by Treatment2.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.19
Ritalin LA 80 mgChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by Treatment2.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 on SDS Total Score by Treatment5.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.15
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)

CGI-I assesses the overall change of illness relative to baseline. CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change from baseline, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse 7 = very much worse

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 2 (FAS P2) - all randomized patients who took one dose of study medication in Period 2 Patients with CGI-I assessment both at Baseline 1 and Period 2 was included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)very much improved195 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)much improved230 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)minimally improved42 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)no change16 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)minimally worse7 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)much worse2 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)very much worse0 number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)

CGI-S assesses the patient's current illness state. CGI-S consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = normal, not at all ill , 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 2 (Week 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 2 (FAS P2) - all randomized patients who took one dose of study medication in Period 2; Patients with CGI-S assessment both at Baseline 1 and Period 2 was included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)Normal, not ill at all91 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)borderline mentally ill151 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)mildly ill193 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)moderately ill50 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)markedly ill7 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)severely ill0 number of participants
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Rating at the End of Period 2 (Visit 13/ Week 14)among the most extremely ill patients0 number of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment

On the CGI-I scale, a lower score reflects greater improvement between 1 and 3, a score of 4 is no change, scores higher than 4 reflect worsening. The CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = Very much improved to 7 =Very much worse. Improvement on the CGI-I scale is defined as a visit rating of 1 very much improved or 2 much improved on the CGI-I scale.

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo. Evaluable patients with both baseline 2 and post-baseline (end of week 40) assessments were included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment6 participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment13 participants
Ritalin LA 80 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-I Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment21 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment

CGI-S assesses the patient's current illness state. CGI-S consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = normal, not at all ill , 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients

Time frame: Baseline 2 to end of Period 3 (end of withdrawal period 40 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 3 (FAS P3) - all re-randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 3. Patients will be assigned to their re-randomized treatment; Ritalin (pooled doses) or placebo. Evaluable patients with both baseline 2 and post-baseline (end of week 40) assessments were included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritalin LA 40 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment39 Participants
Ritalin LA 60 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment50 Participants
Ritalin LA 80 mgNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment35 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Worsening on CGI-S Scale From Baseline Period 3 (Baseline 2) to End of Period 3 by Treatment72 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 1

On the CGI-I scale, a lower score reflects greater improvement between 1 and 3, a score of 4 is no change, scores higher than 4 reflect worsening. The CGI-I consists of 7 ratings that range from 1 = Very much improved to 7 =Very much worse. Improvement on the CGI-I scale is defined as a visit rating of 1 very much improved or 2 much improved on the CGI-I scale. Percentage has been calculated from the evaluable patients (N) as Percentage = n/N \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline 1 to End of Period 1 (Week 9)

Population: Full Analysis Set for Period 1 (FAS P1) - all randomized patients who take one dose of study medication in period 1. Patients will be assigned to their randomized fixed dose. Evaluable patients with both baseline and post-baseline (end of week 9) assessments were included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritalin LA 40 mgPercentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 156.3 Percentage of Patients
Ritalin LA 60 mgPercentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 154.8 Percentage of Patients
Ritalin LA 80 mgPercentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 157.1 Percentage of Patients
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline Period 1 (Baseline 1) to End of Period 131.7 Percentage of Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026