Skip to content

Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer

Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Early Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01258413
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-12-13
Start date
1999-11-30
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2010-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer, Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Cervical Cancer, Radical hysterectomy, Laparoscopic, Overall survival, Disease-free five-years survival

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer will has decreased postoperative pain intensity compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy with similar postoperative complications and survival rates.

Detailed description

Background: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is one of the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) recommended treatments for early cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare radical hysterectomy by laparoscopic approach and open radical hysterectomy in a single center randomized clinical trial. Nevertheless, there are no finished randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy although there is an ongoing trial. Methods: Were enrolled 30 IA2 with lymph vascular space invasion and IB cervical cancer patients. Postoperative pain intensity was defined as primary endpoint and pain intensity was measured by a 10-point numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes were: intraoperative and other postoperative outcomes, histopathological outcomes and 5-year follow-up. Data analysis is being done at this moment

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy

uterus, upper 1-2cm of vagina , parametrial tissue and uterosacral ligament + pelvic lymphadenectomy are removed by laparoscopic approach

uterus, upper 1-2cm of vagina , parametrial tissue and uterosacral ligament + pelvic lymphadenectomy are removed by abdominal approach

Sponsors

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women of 18 years or older referred to our service with histologically confirmed primary squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous cervical cancer diagnosed by biopsy or cervical conization, clinically FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologic and Obstetrics) staged IA2 with lymph vascular invasion, IB and II A.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with clinically advanced disease (IIB-IV), previous pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy, pregnancy, clinical diseases that would preclude one or both surgical approaches.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative pain measured by a 10 point numeric rating scalearound one weekThe primary outcome is postoperative pain as measured by a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) during the postoperative period. Pain was assessed every six hours by nursing staff during a patient's usual postoperative care. The nursing staff was not aware of the study objective.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative complication30 days or five years1 Intraoperative outcomes included the following: operative time (minutes), injuries to the ureter, bladder, bowel or vessels and anaesthesia complications requiring blood transfusion. 2\. Early (\< 30 days) or late postoperative events and findings during the hospital stay or after included the following: hospital stay duration (days), complications. Surgical or clinical findings that could be attributable to the treatment in five years of follow up 74 Clinical or surgical findings that could be attributable to the treatment or the disease at five years of follow-up.
Surgicopathological outcomespostoperativelyoutcomes included the following: histological type, surgical margins, lymph node status and lymph node number, all assessed by pathologists with expertise in gynaecologic oncology. In addition, parametrial and vaginal cuff width (centimetres) was assessed by the first surgeon in the operating room, before tissue processing.
Overall survival and disease-free survivalfive yearsClinical status in the last visit recorded; Date and location of the first recurrence or metastasis. Time frame: five years from surgery

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026