Skip to content

DHEA Against Vaginal Atrophy - 3-Month Efficacy Study

DHEA Against Vaginal Atrophy (Placebo-controlled, Double-blind and Randomized Phase III Study of 3-month Intravaginal DHEA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01256684
Enrollment
255
Registered
2010-12-08
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2017-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Atrophy

Keywords

Vulvar/vaginal atrophy, Atrophic Vaginitis, Dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA, Prasterone, Vaginorm, Menopause, Intrarosa

Brief summary

The purpose of this Phase III trial is to confirm the efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo vaginal suppository

DRUGDHEA

Vaginal suppository containing 0.25% (3.25 mg) DHEA; daily dosing with one suppository for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

EndoCeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Postmenopausal women (hysterectomized or non-hysterectomized) * Women between 40 and 75 years of age. * Willing to participate in the study and sign an informed consent. * Women who have self-identified symptom(s)of vaginal atrophy. * For non-hysterectomized women, willing to have endometrial biopsy at screening and end of study. Main

Exclusion criteria

* Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding. * Hypertension equal to or above 140/90 mm Hg. * The administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening visit. * Endometrial hyperplasia, cancer or endometrial histology showing proliferative, secretory or menstrual type characteristics at histologic evaluation of endometrial biopsy performed at screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of parabasal cell was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including the basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of superficial cell was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including the basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline and Week 12A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline and Week 12The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline and Week 12The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of vaginal dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 464 subjects were screened at 33 medical/research sites located in the US (24 centers) and Canada (9 centers) and 255 subjects were randomized. The first subject first visit was on 30-NOV-2010 and the last subject last visit was on 29-JUL-2011.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo vaginal suppository
80
0.25% DHEA
DHEA: Vaginal suppository containing 0.25% (3.25 mg) DHEA; daily dosing with one suppository for 12 weeks.
86
0.50% DHEA
DHEA: Vaginal suppository containing 0.50% (6.5 mg) DHEA; daily dosing with one suppository for 12 weeks.
87
Total253

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event142
Overall StudyEntry criteria not met/non-compliance476
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy011
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject402

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo0.25% DHEA0.50% DHEATotal
Age, Continuous58.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89
59.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39
57.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63
58.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.01
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Caucasian
69 Participants81 Participants83 Participants233 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
80 Participants86 Participants87 Participants253 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 8012 / 8610 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 803 / 861 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of parabasal cell was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including the basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline68.48 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.62 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1266.86 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.37
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1228.43 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.62
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-37.29 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.16
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline65.72 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.56
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-47.40 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.72
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1217.65 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.87
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline65.05 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 4.63
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of superficial cell was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including the basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 121.64 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline0.73 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 120.91 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.31
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 125.43 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.57
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline0.68 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.13
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 124.75 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.58
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline0.68 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.12
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 125.62 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.61
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 126.30 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.59
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Dyspareunia

The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline2.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaWeek 121.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline2.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaWeek 121.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaWeek 121.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH

A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 126.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 125.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 125.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Color

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Integrity

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 122.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Secretions

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to DHEA suppositories, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were then analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 121.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Dryness

The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of vaginal dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses on vaginal dryness were performed on a sub-group of the Intent to Treat (ITT) population (defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria) who have self-identified moderate to severe vaginal dryness at Baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessWeek 121.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessWeek 120.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessWeek 120.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026