Skip to content

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Etelcalcetide in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of KAI-4169 in Hemodialysis Subjects With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01254565
Enrollment
87
Registered
2010-12-06
Start date
2011-02-20
Completion date
2011-08-24
Last updated
2017-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Keywords

Clinical Trial, Phase 2, Renal Dialysis, Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Parathyroid hormone

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and tolerability and efficacy of multiple ascending doses of etelcalcetide in hemodialysis patients for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT).

Interventions

Administered intravenously (IV) at the end of hemodialysis

DRUGPlacebo

Administered intravenously at the end of hemodialysis

Sponsors

KAI Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject provides written informed consent. * Intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) at least 350 pg/mL. * Corrected calcium at least 9.0 mg/dL. * Hemoglobin at least 9.0 g/dL. * Adequate hemodialysis three times per week. * Excepting chronic renal failure, subject is judged to be in stable medical condition based on medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests.

Exclusion criteria

* History or symptomatic ventricular dysrhythmias. * History of angina pectoris or congestive heart failure * History of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass grafting within the past 6 months. * History of or treatment for seizure disorder. * Recent (3 months) parathyroidectomy. * Serum transaminases (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) greater than two times the upper limit of normal at screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as the period between 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEfficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.
Percent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.
Percentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEfficacy assessment phase
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 11 study centers in the United States from 17 February 2011 (first participant enrolled) to 24 August 2011 (last participant completed follow up). A total of 87 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) receiving hemodialysis were enrolled and randomized in the study.

Pre-assignment details

This was a multiple-ascending dose study consisting of 3 cohorts: Cohort 1 participants were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive etelcalcetide or placebo for 2 weeks; Cohorts 2 and 3 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive etelcalcetide or placebo for 4 weeks. Randomization was stratified by serum parathyroid hormone (\< 600 or ≥ 600 pg/mL).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Placebo
Participants received placebo administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session three times a week (TIW) for 2 weeks.
4
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mg
Participants received 5 mg etelcalcetide administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session TIW for 2 weeks.
6
Cohort 2: Placebo
Participants received placebo administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session TIW for 4 weeks.
21
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mg
Participants received 10 mg etelcalcetide administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session TIW for 4 weeks.
21
Cohort 3: Placebo
Participants received placebo administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session TIW for 4 weeks.
13
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mg
Participants received 5 mg etelcalcetide administered by intravenous injection at the end of each hemodialysis session TIW for 4 weeks.
13
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyDid not Receive Treatment110034
Overall StudyNon-compliance to Study Procedures000010
Overall StudyOther000100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgTotalCohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgCohort 3: PlaceboCohort 1: PlaceboCohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mg
Age, Continuous52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.88
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.99
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.66
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Corrected Calcium9.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
9.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
9.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
9.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
9.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
9.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
9.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants5 Participants70 Participants10 Participants11 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Parathyroid Hormone601.5 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 239.2
588.3 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 250.52
659.4 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 361.28
662.1 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 442.01
619.4 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 310.35
636.3 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 191.64
765.1 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 480.82
Phosphorus6.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83
5.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49
5.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
5.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17
5.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.18
Race
Black or African American
20 Participants5 Participants63 Participants9 Participants9 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Race
White
1 Participants1 Participants15 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants30 Participants5 Participants5 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants2 Participants48 Participants8 Participants8 Participants2 Participants15 Participants
Stratification Factor: Screening Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
< 600 pg/mL
11 Participants4 Participants46 Participants9 Participants7 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Stratification Factor: Screening Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
≥ 600 pg/mL
10 Participants2 Participants32 Participants4 Participants6 Participants1 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 44 / 65 / 212 / 212 / 133 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 41 / 62 / 213 / 211 / 133 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as the period between 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase0.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.11
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-19.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.65
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase28.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 70.39
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-49.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.42
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase2.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.44
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-hemodialysis Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-33.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.28
Comparison: The hypothesis for this study (Cohorts 2 and 3) was that intravenous administration of etelcalcetide is superior to placebo for the reduction of PTH after TIW dosing in hemodialysis patients with secondary HPT. This hypothesis was tested in Cohorts 2 and 3 by comparing the mean percent changes from baseline in pre-hemodialysis PTH levels collected during the efficacy phase between the etelcalcetide and placebo groups within each cohort.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-86.9, -50]ANOVA
Comparison: The hypothesis for this study (Cohorts 2 and 3) was that intravenous administration of etelcalcetide is superior to placebo for the reduction of PTH after TIW dosing in hemodialysis patients with secondary HPT. This hypothesis was tested in Cohorts 2 and 3 by comparing the mean percent changes from baseline in pre-hemodialysis PTH levels collected during the efficacy phase between the etelcalcetide and placebo groups within each cohort.p-value: 0.003295% CI: [-59.8, -13.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase9.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase76.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase15.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase53.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0968Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase16.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase4.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase7.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase46.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.073Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Time frame: Efficacy assessment phase

Population: Modified intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL4.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL47.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL15.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL53.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL76.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhasePhosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL46.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population with available data; Phosphorus data were not collected at baseline for participants in Cohort 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-0.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.25
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-11.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.32
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase14.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.79
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-12.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.99
p-value: 0.011295% CI: [-26.8, -4.9]ANOVA
p-value: 0.055495% CI: [-39.3, -1.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase1.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.76
Cohort 1: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-7.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.62
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-1.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.25
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-13.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.17
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase1.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 5.26
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium (cCa) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-6.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.95
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-16.4, -8.4]ANOVA
p-value: 0.023595% CI: [-12.8, -1]ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Baseline is defined as the average of pre-hemodialysis values obtained on day -2 and day 1. The efficacy assessment phase (defined as 3 days before and 3 days after the last dose of investigational product) value is the mean of all predialysis values obtained during that period.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (from 3 days before to 3 days after the last dose of study drug; approximately 2 weeks for Cohort 1 and 4 weeks for Cohorts 2 and 3)

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population with available data; Phosphorus data were not collected at baseline for participants in Cohort 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase1.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.92
Cohort 2: Etelcalcetide 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-2.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.86
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase14.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.05
Cohort 3: Etelcalcetide 5 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Phosphorus (P) During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-7.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.83
p-value: 0.225595% CI: [-18.6, 5.7]ANOVA
p-value: 0.175195% CI: [-29.8, 5.9]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026