Skip to content

Phosphate Kinetic Modeling 2

Phosphate Kinetic Modeling 2

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01252771
Acronym
PKM2
Enrollment
81
Registered
2010-12-03
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ESRD, Hyperphosphatemia

Keywords

phosphorus, dialysis, PhosLo

Brief summary

The study aims to investigate the concept of computer based Phosphate Kinetic Modeling (PKM) in the hemodialysis patient population. This computerized algorithm model was developed as a tool to aid physicians in controlling a hemodialysis patient's phosphate level. Once a subject consents to participate in the study, the subject's dietary phosphate intake will be estimated by the modeling program and the appropriate dose of the phosphate binder calcium acetate (PhosLo) will be recommended accordingly. If necessary, the Ca++ concentration of the dialysate will be changed to remove any excess calcium absorbed as the result of an increase in the PhosLo prescription to control phosphorus.

Detailed description

PKM consists of a set of validated and computerized algorithms to perform the following steps: 1. Calculate calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) intake and absorption in individual patients as a function of the prescribed doses of Vitamin D analogues, protein catabolic rate (PCR) and dietary and binder Ca intakes. 2. Calculate P removal between dialyses by P binders and P and Ca removal during dialysis from kinetic analysis of total P and Ca transport during dialysis based on dialyzer P and Ca transport coefficients and the levels of dialysate Ca and serum Ca and P. 3. Thus from analysis of intake, absorption and removal the program can calculate net Ca and P balance in modeled patients. 4. Calculate the daily dose of phosphate binder (PhosLo) required to reduce the serum P to normal in patients with hyperphosphatemia. 5. Calculate the dialysate Ca required to achieve zero calcium balance over complete dialysis cycles - the interdialytic interval and immediately succeeding dialytic interval. 6. The program also computes a Phosphorus-Protein ratio (PPR, the total P removed divided by PCR, mg/gm/day) which provides a quantitative index of compliance with prescribed dietary P restriction and/or the prescribed dose of binders. It is hoped that this information will be valuable to guide semi-quantitative evaluations of diet P and binder intakes in patients difficult to manage. Study subjects will bring their PhosLo pill bottles to treatments weekly. At this time the subject's dietitian will determine and record the remaining pills. The comparison of pills taken versus pilled prescribed will be performed with any data available. While weekly counts are desirable for providing more information about the consistency of a patient's compliance, a minimum of monthly counts will be sufficient. This will be done to validate the PPR range needed to accurately identify compliance with PhosLo regimen. Patients will also be instructed to bring all empty PhosLo bottles to site dietitian. The site dietitian will record pill count data in a form for each patient. The updated version of the PKM algorithm also includes computation of the dose of vitamin D analogues and cinacalcet (Sensipar). This modification of the PKM algorithm may help to better achieve neutral calcium balance, because the intestinal calcium absorption heavily depends on vitamin D levels. The computation of cinacalcet aids the control of parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels within the target range.

Interventions

OTHERPKM Algorithm

The subject's serum calcium and phosphorus values will be input into PKM in order to determine the required PhosLo prescription. The prescription is determined as the number of gelcaps per day that must be taken by the subject. If PKM determines the number of PhosLo gelcaps per day to be greater than or equal to the subject's current prescription, then PKM will calculate the current Ca++ and phosphate balance. Furthermore, the PKM algorithm will determine the additional number of PhosLo gelcaps needed to achieve neutral phosphate (P) balance with serum P reduced to 5.5 mg/dL. The PKM algorithm also calculates the total P intake between dialyses and along with ePCR also calculates a Phosphorus/Protein Ratio (PPR). This ratio ranges from 8 to 14 in dialysis patients following a renal diet.

Sponsors

Renal Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Fresenius Medical Care North America
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is capable of giving informed consent. 2. Age \> 18 years 3. Thrice weekly hemodialysis with a dialysate Ca++ concentration (CdiCa) of 2.0, 2.25 or 2.5 mEq/L 4. Stable CdiCa of either 2.0, 2.25 or 2.5 mEq/L for ≥ 4 weeks 5. Dialysis vintage ≥ 3 months 6. Three-month average P \> 5.5 mg/dL AND 2 of 3 monthly average P \>=5.8 mg/dL 7. Patients currently prescribed calcium acetate (PhosLo) mono-therapy , sevelamer monotherapy, or a combination therapy of PhosLo plus sevelamer for phosphate binding with willingness of physician to switch to PhosLo monotherapy 8. Fresenius Optiflux F 160, 180 or 200 dialyzer

Exclusion criteria

1. Any laboratory abnormality, medical condition or psychiatric disorder which in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject's disease management at risk or may result in the subject being unable to comply with study requirements 2. Known pregnancy 3. Parathyroidectomy 4. iPTH \< 50 pg/mL 5. Hospitalization in past 30 days 6. Dialysate potassium prescription other than 2 or 3 mmol/L 7. Serum Ca++ \< 7.5 mg/dL 8. Current vitamin D therapy using calcitriol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in serum phosphorus6 monthsThe primary outcome variable is the change in serum phosphorus between a baseline period and the latest value of the intervention period.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026