Skip to content

Comparison of Elective Lymph Node Treatment Versus Clinical Observation in the Absence of Palpable Lymph Nodes for High Risk Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)

High Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Mohs Surgery Randomized to Elective Management of the Draining Lymph Nodes vs. Periodic Clinical Nodal Observation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01252329
Enrollment
29
Registered
2010-12-02
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2014-07-14
Last updated
2017-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, selective neck dissection, elective lymph node management, clinical nodal observation

Brief summary

This study will evaluate if there is a difference in survival between elective treatment of draining lymph nodes vs. clinical nodal observation in patients undergoing Mohs surgery for high risk skin squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who have a normal lymph node exam. Each treatment arm is accepted as a current standard of care, and the objective is to compare outcomes between the two arms.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded, controlled trial of high risk head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas which will compare specific outcomes between two treatment arms. Subjects are eligible patients who are sent to Zitelli & Brodland PC for Mohs micrographic surgery of tumors that meet our high risk criteria. These patients with clinically-negative lymph node exams will either enter into the arm of nodal observation or the arm of elective management of the neck, which is currently the standard protocol per the UPMC ENT department. The patients in the observation arm will have evaluation and treatment of their lymph nodes if an abnormality is detected clinically. The primary endpoint is disease-specific survival. Secondary endpoints will include overall and disease-free survival, complications, and quality of life measures for each arm.

Interventions

PROCEDUREelective lymph node dissection

This entails selective lymph node dissection in patients with negative lymph node exams. The nodes dissected are those that drain from the high risk cutaneous squamous cell cancer. Subsequent radiation and/or chemotherapy may be administered in a small percentage of subjects, depending on the result of the neck dissection.

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major criterion and at least one minor criteria * Major criterion: \> 6 mm depth of invasion * Minor criteria (one or more): * Greater than 2cm diameter * Recurrent (prior Mohs, wide local excision, electrodesiccation and curettage, topical imiquimod or 5 fluorouracil, cryotherapy or photodynamic therapy) * High risk location: any portion of cutaneous lip, ear, temple, scalp * Immunosuppressed host (organ transplant recipient or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) * Perineural invasion (yes/no; nerve involved must be greater than 0.1mm) * Direct involvement of subcutaneous tissue (Clark's V), muscle, cartilage,or bone

Exclusion criteria

* Satellite metastases * Clinically abnormal lymph node exam * Location other than head or neck * Exclusively mucosal squamous cell carcinoma * Previous head and neck radiation * In situ disease, keratoacanthoma subtypes, metatypical or collision tumors * Inability of subject to give written informed consent * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disease-specific survival5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival5 years
Disease-free survival5 years
Complications5 yearsThis refers to any adverse event or side effect related to any of the study interventions.
quality of life5 yearsThis refers to quality of life measured with a standard questionnaire. The two arms will be compared with respect to their differences (if any) in quality of life.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026