Skip to content

Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Follow-on Study

A Phase III, Prospective, Multicentre, Open Label, Extension Study Assessing the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Treatment With DYSPORT® Used in the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity in Children With Dynamic Equinus Foot Deformity Due to Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01251380
Enrollment
216
Registered
2010-12-01
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Children, Muscle Spasticity

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study was to determine the long term safety and efficacy of repeated treatments with Dysport® used in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with dynamic equinus foot deformity due to cerebral palsy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBotulinum toxin type A

Intramuscular (IM) injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle.

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects were eligible for participation in the study if they met the following criteria: 1. Completion of the double blind study (Study 141) up to the Week 12, Week 16, Week 22 or Week 28 follow up visit. 2. Without any major protocol deviations and/or any ongoing adverse events (AEs), either of which, in the opinion of the Investigator would pose an unacceptable risk to the subject were he/she to continue receiving treatment in this open label extension study. 3. Written informed consent obtained from the child's parent(s)/guardian(s) for this study, and assent from the child when and where applicable.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects were excluded from entering the study for the following reasons: 1. Major limitation in the passive range of motion at the ankle, as defined by maximum ankle dorsiflexion measured by the angle of arrest (XV1) at slow speed \<80° (TS angle) in the most affected leg to be injected. 2. Unwillingness or inability to comply with the protocol. 3. Current need for surgery for spasticity of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex (GSC) and/or hamstring muscles (and/or tendons) in the most affected leg to be injected. 4. Treatment with any drug that interferes either directly or indirectly with neuromuscular function (e.g. aminoglycoside antibiotics) or neuroblocking agents used during surgery (e.g. curare) within the last 30 days prior to study medication or a planned treatment with such drugs. 5. Be pregnant and/or lactating. 6. Female subjects, not willing to use contraceptive measures throughout the course of the study if post pubertal and sexually active. 7. An infection at the injection site(s). 8. Planned treatment with any new investigational drug or device during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.From baseline (Day 1) until end of study (Week 40) of Cycle 1 and up to Week 28 of Cycles 2 to 4.Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time of informed consent to the end of the study. All AEs were elicited by direct, non-leading questioning or by spontaneous reports.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4.Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to the first injection in the hamstrings. The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 2 and 3.Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to the first injection in the upper limb(s). The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension). No subjects were treated in the upper limb in Treatment Cycle 4.
Mean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreWeeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4.Global assessment of treatment response based on changes since the first injection in the DB study. PGA Scale of the Treatment Response: Global assessment of treatment response was assessed by asking the Investigator the following question: how would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb(s) since the first injection in the DB study? Answers were made on a 9 point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved, +4: markedly improved).
Mean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreWeeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4Individual goals were defined prior to treatment in each treatment period. The GAS is a functional scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. Individual goals were defined for each subject by the physician, and the child's parents (caregiver) where applicable, prior to treatment. After treatment in each treatment cycle, the GAS for each goal was rated using a defined scale (-2: Much less than expected outcome, -1: Somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: Expected outcome, 1: Somewhat more than expected outcome, and 2: Much more than expected outcome).
Mean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbDB baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from DB baseline in XV1 at slow speed was derived.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbDB baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from DB baseline in XV3 at fast speed was derived.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbDB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). X (threshold) was derived as XV1 at slow speed minus XV3 at fast speed and the mean change from DB baseline was calculated.
Mean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbDB baseline; Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4Baseline for the 'change from DB baseline' was defined as the baseline of Study 141 for all treatment cycles. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in XV1 at slow speed was derived.
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in XV3 at fast speed was derived.
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). X (threshold) was derived as XV1 at slow speed minus XV3 at fast speed and the mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) was calculated.
Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbBaseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in Y was derived from the TS. Y was graded according to the following scale: Grade 0 - no resistance throughout passive movement (best outcome); Grade 1 - slight resistance throughout passive movement; Grade 2 - clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release; Grade 3 - fatigable clonus (less than 10 sec when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release; Grade 4 - unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle; Grade 5 - joint immovable (worst outcome). Catch without release was graded 0 if XV1=XV3, 'unratable' spasticity otherwise; catch with 'minimal' release was graded 2 if XV3 was consistent and consistently less than XV1. Angle 0 = position of minimal stretch of the tested muscle. For Grades 0 and 1, spasticity angle X = 0 by definition.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegDB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The OGS is a measurement tool used to objectively quantify positive and negative features (impairments) of the upper motor neurone syndrome. The OGS is useful when children are too young or insufficiently cooperative for instrumented gait analysis. It is based on the Physicians Rating Scale but has some modifications to improve its sensitivity to detect changes following administration of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A). The OGS total score was calculated as the sum of the individual question scores for Questions 1 to 7, with the highest possible score being 20. The parameters collected were: knee position in midstance, initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, timing of heel raise, hindfoot at midstance, base of support and gait assistive devices. Higher scores indicate better gait. The mean change from baseline (in the DB study) in the OGS total score of the (most) affected leg was derived.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Baseline and Week 12The PedsQL has a disease specific CP module that is relevant to the study population and complements the core modules. The 35-item questionnaire encompassed 7 scales including (1) daily activities (2) school activities (3) movement and balance (4) pain and hurt (5) fatigue (6) eating activities and (7) speech and communication. A 5-point scale was utilised for parent proxy-report: 0 = never a problem; 1 = almost never a problem; 2 = sometimes a problem; 3 = often a problem; 4 = almost always a problem. Each CP score was calculated as follows: (1) Individual item scores were reversed and transformed from a 0-4 scale to a 0-100 scale by assigning 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0; (2) Each scale score was calculated as the sum of the transformed individual item scores, divided by the number of non-missing items. Higher scores indicated better quality of life (fewer symptoms or problems). A scale score was only calculated if at least 50% of the associated items were non-missing.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Baseline and Week 12The PedsQL is a validated quality of life questionnaire, designed for children from 2 to 18 years of age. The Generic Core Scale covers four multidimensional scales including physical, emotional, social and school aspects, with three summary scales of total scale score, physical health summary score and psychosocial health summary score. Each generic core scale was calculated as follows: (1) Individual item scores were reversed and transformed from a 0-4 scale to a 0-100 scale by assigning 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0; (2) Each scale score was calculated as the sum of the transformed individual item scores, divided by the number of non-missing items. Higher scores indicated better quality of life (fewer symptoms or problems). A scale score was only calculated if at least 50% of the associated items were non-missing.
Mean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbDB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4The mean change from baseline (in the DB study) in Y was derived from the TS. Y was graded according to the following scale: Grade 0 - no resistance throughout passive movement (best outcome); Grade 1 - slight resistance throughout passive movement; Grade 2 - clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release; Grade 3 - fatigable clonus (less than 10 sec when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release; Grade 4 - unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle; Grade 5 - joint immovable (worst outcome). Catch without release was graded 0 if XV1=XV3, 'unratable' spasticity otherwise; catch with 'minimal' release was graded 2 if XV3 was consistent and consistently less than XV1. Angle 0 = position of minimal stretch of the tested muscle. For Grades 0 and 1, spasticity angle X = 0 by definition.

Countries

Chile, France, Mexico, Poland, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multicentre study performed at 27 investigational sites in France, Mexico, Turkey, Poland, Chile and the United States of America (USA). Twenty six sites recruited at least one subject and the other site was inactive.

Pre-assignment details

Of 216 subjects enrolled in this open label study from Study Y-55-52120-141, 203 went straight into Cycle 1. 13 subjects were not considered eligible for re-treatment at end (all of whom had received Dysport) and as per study design they entered into the observational phase of Study 147. Of these 13, 4 subjects entered Cycle 1 at a later date.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Dysport
Dysport was injected into the affected GSC with / without Hamstring injections at doses ranging between 5 U/kg to 20 U/kg for one leg and 10 U/kg to 30 U/kg for both legs
216
Total216

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther (Not otherwise specified)12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Dysport
Age, Continuous5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
Age, Customized
Children (10-17 years)
33 participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-9 years)
183 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
159 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
130 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
147 / 215
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 215

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.

Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time of informed consent to the end of the study. All AEs were elicited by direct, non-leading questioning or by spontaneous reports.

Time frame: From baseline (Day 1) until end of study (Week 40) of Cycle 1 and up to Week 28 of Cycles 2 to 4.

Population: Safety Population - all enrolled subjects. One subject received placebo in the DB study and two treatment cycles of Dysport in the OL study. However, as both Dysport treatments were outside of the ranges specified (≤7.5 U/kg in Treatment Cycle 1 and Treatment Cycle 2), the subject was excluded from the analysis (no TEAEs reported for this subject).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Related & Moderate9 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Related & Mild23 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Any TEAEs leading to Study Withdrawal1 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Any TEAE177 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Intensity of TEAEs - at least 1 is Severe5 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Intensity of TEAEs - at least 1 is Moderate91 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Intensity of TEAEs - at least 1 is Mild151 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Intensity of TEAEs - at least 1 is Missing1 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Causality of TEAEs - at least 1 is Related29 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Causality of TEAEs - at least 1 is Not Related172 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Causality of TEAEs - at least 1 is Missing0 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Related & Severe0 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Not Related & Severe5 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Not Related & Moderate87 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.TEAEs - at least 1 is Not Related & Mild145 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Any TEAEs leading to Death0 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)7 participants
Total DysportNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported in the Double Blind (DB) + Open Label (OL) Period.Any Non-serious TEAEs175 participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

Baseline for the 'change from DB baseline' was defined as the baseline of Study 141 for all treatment cycles. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).

Time frame: DB baseline; Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively, in the OL study. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1, Week 12 (n=157)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3, Week 4 (n=66)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1, Week 4 (n=170)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2, Week 4 (n=122)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2, Week 12 (n=93)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3, Week 12 (n=35)-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (in the DB Study) in the MAS Score in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4, Week 4 (n=8)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to the first injection in the hamstrings. The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4.

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 5 U/kg and 10 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the hamstring of the (most) affected leg were \>3 to ≤7.5 U/kg and \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg, respectively. Analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤3 or \>12.5 U/kg. Only data from subjects injected in the hamstring are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1, Week 4 (n=25)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3, Week 4 (n=13)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1, Week 12 (n=24)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2, Week 4 (n=33)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2, Week 12 (n=21)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3, Week 12 (n=5)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in the MAS Score in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4, Week 4 (n=2)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). X (threshold) was derived as XV1 at slow speed minus XV3 at fast speed and the mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) was calculated.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 5 U/kg and 10 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the hamstring of the (most) affected leg were \>3 to ≤7.5 U/kg and \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg, respectively. Analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤3 or \>12.5 U/kg. Only data from subjects injected in the hamstring are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=26)-6.9 degreesStandard Deviation 11.3
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=24)-6.5 degreesStandard Deviation 11.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=33)-5.2 degreesStandard Deviation 12
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=21)-6.9 degreesStandard Deviation 11.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=13)-8.1 degreesStandard Deviation 13.6
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=5)-28.0 degreesStandard Deviation 20.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in X Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=2)0.0 degreesStandard Deviation 14.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in XV1 at slow speed was derived.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 5 U/kg and 10 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the hamstring of the (most) affected leg were \>3 to ≤7.5 U/kg and \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg, respectively. Analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤3 or \>12.5 U/kg. Only data from subjects injected in the hamstring are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=26)3.2 degreesStandard Deviation 10
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=24)6.9 degreesStandard Deviation 10.4
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=33)3.0 degreesStandard Deviation 11.4
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=21)5.5 degreesStandard Deviation 11.4
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=13)3.8 degreesStandard Deviation 12.1
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=5)2.0 degreesStandard Deviation 7.6
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV1 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=2)5.0 degreesStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the knee flexors at the knee joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in XV3 at fast speed was derived.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 5 U/kg and 10 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the hamstring of the (most) affected leg were \>3 to ≤7.5 U/kg and \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg, respectively. Analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤3 or \>12.5 U/kg. Only data from subjects injected in the hamstring are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=13)11.9 degreesStandard Deviation 22.3
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=26)10.1 degreesStandard Deviation 14.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=24)13.3 degreesStandard Deviation 16.3
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=33)8.2 degreesStandard Deviation 15.1
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=21)12.4 degreesStandard Deviation 16.5
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=5)30.0 degreesStandard Deviation 24.5
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in XV3 Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=2)5.0 degreesStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The mean change from baseline (prior to the first injection cycle in the hamstrings) in Y was derived from the TS. Y was graded according to the following scale: Grade 0 - no resistance throughout passive movement (best outcome); Grade 1 - slight resistance throughout passive movement; Grade 2 - clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release; Grade 3 - fatigable clonus (less than 10 sec when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release; Grade 4 - unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle; Grade 5 - joint immovable (worst outcome). Catch without release was graded 0 if XV1=XV3, 'unratable' spasticity otherwise; catch with 'minimal' release was graded 2 if XV3 was consistent and consistently less than XV1. Angle 0 = position of minimal stretch of the tested muscle. For Grades 0 and 1, spasticity angle X = 0 by definition.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Baseline and Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 5 U/kg and 10 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the hamstring of the (most) affected leg were \>3 to ≤7.5 U/kg and \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg, respectively. Analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤3 or \>12.5 U/kg. Only data from subjects injected in the hamstring are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=26)-0.1 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=24)-0.1 degreesStandard Deviation 0.5
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=33)0.0 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=21)-0.1 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=13)-0.1 degreesStandard Deviation 0.3
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=5)-0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in the Hamstrings) in Y Derived From the TS, in the Knee Flexors Assessed at the Knee Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=2)0.0 degreesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 Onwards

Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to the first injection in the upper limb(s). The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. The investigator graded muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension). No subjects were treated in the upper limb in Treatment Cycle 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 2 and 3.

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. Only data from subjects injected in the upper limb muscle groups are presented. TC = Treatment Cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 2: Elbow Flexors at Week 4 (n=14)-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 2: Elbow Flexors at Week 12 (n=12)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 2: Wrist Flexors at Week 4 (n=11)-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 2: Wrist Flexors at Week 12 (n=8)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 3: Elbow Flexors at Week 4 (n=2)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 3: Elbow Flexors at Week 12 (n=1)-1.0 units on a scale
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 3: Wrist Flexors at Week 4 (n=5)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Change From Baseline (Prior to the First Injection Cycle in Upper Limb Muscle Groups) in the Mean MAS Score for All Injected Upper Limb Muscle Groups From Treatment Cycle 2 OnwardsTC 3: Wrist Flexors at Week 12 (n=2)-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from DB baseline in XV1 at slow speed was derived.

Time frame: DB baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=66)0.5 degreesStandard Deviation 10.1
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=169)2.6 degreesStandard Deviation 9
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=156)1.4 degreesStandard Deviation 9.2
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=121)1.4 degreesStandard Deviation 9.2
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=92)0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 10.9
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=35)-1.1 degreesStandard Deviation 10.4
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Arrest (XV1) Derived From the Tardieu Scale (TS), in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)-5.0 degreesStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). The mean change from DB baseline in XV3 at fast speed was derived.

Time frame: DB baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=119)13.3 degreesStandard Deviation 12.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=168)12.2 degreesStandard Deviation 13.7
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=155)9.9 degreesStandard Deviation 13.7
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=92)11.4 degreesStandard Deviation 13.9
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=65)12.7 degreesStandard Deviation 13.4
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=35)9.9 degreesStandard Deviation 14.5
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Angle of Catch (XV3) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)4.4 degreesStandard Deviation 11.8
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The TS was used to measure spasticity in the GSC at the ankle joint of the (most) affected lower limb. The Investigator assessed muscle reactions of the tested muscle to passive stretch at two velocities: SLOW = V1: as slow as possible (slower than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity); FAST = V2 (speed of the limb segment falling under gravity) or V3 (as fast as possible - faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). X (threshold) was derived as XV1 at slow speed minus XV3 at fast speed and the mean change from DB baseline was calculated.

Time frame: DB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=155)-8.5 degreesStandard Deviation 11.9
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=119)-12.0 degreesStandard Deviation 12
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=35)-11.0 degreesStandard Deviation 13.4
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=168)-9.7 degreesStandard Deviation 12.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=92)-10.9 degreesStandard Deviation 12.8
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=65)-12.2 degreesStandard Deviation 11.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Angle (X) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)-9.4 degreesStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

The mean change from baseline (in the DB study) in Y was derived from the TS. Y was graded according to the following scale: Grade 0 - no resistance throughout passive movement (best outcome); Grade 1 - slight resistance throughout passive movement; Grade 2 - clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release; Grade 3 - fatigable clonus (less than 10 sec when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release; Grade 4 - unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle; Grade 5 - joint immovable (worst outcome). Catch without release was graded 0 if XV1=XV3, 'unratable' spasticity otherwise; catch with 'minimal' release was graded 2 if XV3 was consistent and consistently less than XV1. Angle 0 = position of minimal stretch of the tested muscle. For Grades 0 and 1, spasticity angle X = 0 by definition.

Time frame: DB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at week 4 (n=169)-0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 0.7
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 1 at week 12 (n=155)-0.3 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at week 4 (n=120)-0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 0.7
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 2 at week 12 (n=92)-0.3 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at week 4 (n=66)-0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 3 at week 12 (n=35)-0.3 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in Spasticity Grade (Y) Derived From the TS, in the GSC Assessed at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower LimbTreatment Cycle 4 at week 4 (n=8)-0.3 degreesStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected Leg

The OGS is a measurement tool used to objectively quantify positive and negative features (impairments) of the upper motor neurone syndrome. The OGS is useful when children are too young or insufficiently cooperative for instrumented gait analysis. It is based on the Physicians Rating Scale but has some modifications to improve its sensitivity to detect changes following administration of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A). The OGS total score was calculated as the sum of the individual question scores for Questions 1 to 7, with the highest possible score being 20. The parameters collected were: knee position in midstance, initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, timing of heel raise, hindfoot at midstance, base of support and gait assistive devices. Higher scores indicate better gait. The mean change from baseline (in the DB study) in the OGS total score of the (most) affected leg was derived.

Time frame: DB Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=178)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=166)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=142)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=104)0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=70)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=35)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) Total Score of the (Most) Affected LegTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4

The PedsQL has a disease specific CP module that is relevant to the study population and complements the core modules. The 35-item questionnaire encompassed 7 scales including (1) daily activities (2) school activities (3) movement and balance (4) pain and hurt (5) fatigue (6) eating activities and (7) speech and communication. A 5-point scale was utilised for parent proxy-report: 0 = never a problem; 1 = almost never a problem; 2 = sometimes a problem; 3 = often a problem; 4 = almost always a problem. Each CP score was calculated as follows: (1) Individual item scores were reversed and transformed from a 0-4 scale to a 0-100 scale by assigning 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0; (2) Each scale score was calculated as the sum of the transformed individual item scores, divided by the number of non-missing items. Higher scores indicated better quality of life (fewer symptoms or problems). A scale score was only calculated if at least 50% of the associated items were non-missing.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Treatment Cycle 4, Week 12 was not included in the study design. Subjects who completed the study or withdrew were counted as missing at subsequent visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Fatigue at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Daily activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=119, n=39)6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Pain and hurt at Week 12 (n=179, n=120, n=39)3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Speech&Communication at week 12(n=103, n=72, n=26)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Eating activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Movement and balance at Week 12 (n=179,n=120,n=39)7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4School activities at Week 12 (n=103, n=71, n=26)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Movement and balance at Week 12 (n=179,n=120,n=39)8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Daily activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=119, n=39)9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Fatigue at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Pain and hurt at Week 12 (n=179, n=120, n=39)4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4School activities at Week 12 (n=103, n=71, n=26)5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Eating activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Speech&Communication at week 12(n=103, n=72, n=26)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4School activities at Week 12 (n=103, n=71, n=26)7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Daily activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=119, n=39)14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Speech&Communication at week 12(n=103, n=72, n=26)5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Fatigue at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Eating activities at Week 12 (n=178, n=120, n=39)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Movement and balance at Week 12 (n=179,n=120,n=39)13.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (CP Module Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Pain and hurt at Week 12 (n=179, n=120, n=39)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Secondary

Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4

The PedsQL is a validated quality of life questionnaire, designed for children from 2 to 18 years of age. The Generic Core Scale covers four multidimensional scales including physical, emotional, social and school aspects, with three summary scales of total scale score, physical health summary score and psychosocial health summary score. Each generic core scale was calculated as follows: (1) Individual item scores were reversed and transformed from a 0-4 scale to a 0-100 scale by assigning 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0; (2) Each scale score was calculated as the sum of the transformed individual item scores, divided by the number of non-missing items. Higher scores indicated better quality of life (fewer symptoms or problems). A scale score was only calculated if at least 50% of the associated items were non-missing.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Treatment Cycle 4, Week 12 was not included in the study design. Subjects who completed the study or withdrew were counted as missing at subsequent visits. PHS = pyschosocial health summary; W12 = Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Total Scale (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4PHS (W12) (n=174, n=118, n=39)4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Total DysportMean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Physical health summary (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Total Scale (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Physical health summary (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Dysport Treatment Cycle 2Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4PHS (W12) (n=174, n=118, n=39)4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4PHS (W12) (n=174, n=118, n=39)8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Physical health summary (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Dysport Treatment Cycle 3Mean Change From DB Baseline in the PedsQL Score (Generic Core Scores) at Each Study Visit Except Week 4Total Scale (W12) (n=173, n=119, n=39)8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Secondary

Mean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) Score

Individual goals were defined prior to treatment in each treatment period. The GAS is a functional scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. Individual goals were defined for each subject by the physician, and the child's parents (caregiver) where applicable, prior to treatment. After treatment in each treatment cycle, the GAS for each goal was rated using a defined scale (-2: Much less than expected outcome, -1: Somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: Expected outcome, 1: Somewhat more than expected outcome, and 2: Much more than expected outcome).

Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=194)50.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=178)50.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=158)51.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=116)51.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=78)48.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=36)45.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Total DysportMean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) ScoreTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)44.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Secondary

Mean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score

Global assessment of treatment response based on changes since the first injection in the DB study. PGA Scale of the Treatment Response: Global assessment of treatment response was assessed by asking the Investigator the following question: how would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb(s) since the first injection in the DB study? Answers were made on a 9 point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved, +4: markedly improved).

Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12 of Treatment Cycles 1 to 3; Week 4 of Treatment Cycle 4.

Population: ITT population where n represents number of subjects with data. For Dysport 10 U/kg and 15 U/kg, the actual administered doses in the GSC of the (most) affected leg were \>7.5 to ≤12.5 U/kg and \>12.5 to ≤17.5 U/kg, respectively. The analysis excluded subjects with doses ≤7.5 or \>17.5 U/kg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 4 (n=159)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 4 (n=195)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 1 at Week 12 (n=180)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 2 at Week 12 (n=116)0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 4 (n=78)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 3 at Week 12 (n=37)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Total DysportMean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreTreatment Cycle 4 at Week 4 (n=8)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026