Skip to content

Dysport® Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Follow-on Study

A Phase III, Prospective, Multicentre, Open Label, Extension Study, to Assess the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Treatment of Dysport® Intramuscular Injection in the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity in Adult Subjects With Spastic Hemiparesis Due to Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01251367
Enrollment
352
Registered
2010-12-01
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-stroke Spasticity, Spasticity Post-Traumatic Brain Injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with lower limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBotulinum toxin type A

I.M. (intramuscular) injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle.

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion of Dysport® Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Double Blind study Y-55-52120-140 (NCT01249404)

Exclusion criteria

* Fixed contractures in lower limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSystolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleHR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HaematocritBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleBlood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®At Week 4Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSpasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSpasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleMuscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSubjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSpasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleMuscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4Week 4 of each cycleMuscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4Week 4 of each cycleMuscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Week 4 of each cycleAn assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4Week 4 of each cycleAn assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleRange of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb PainBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleThe intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSubjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleSubjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleAll WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleAll WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceBaseline and Week 4 of each cycleAll WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Baseline and Week 4 of each cycleSpasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was designed as a multicentre study and included 51 sites in Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America that included at least one subject. The current study (Study 142) was an open label extension to the double blind Study 140 (Y-55-52120-140).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 366 subjects completed Study 140, of which 352 subjects were enrolled in Study 142. Of these, 7 subjects entered an observational phase and never received open label treatment with Dysport® in Study 142 and the remaining 345 subjects started treatment and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® in Study 142.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Dysport®
Subjects who had completed Study 140 were offered to continue to receive open label treatment with Dysport® in Study 142 for a maximum of 4 additional treatment cycles, with a minimum interval of 12 weeks between treatment cycles. All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1500 U or 1000 U) by i.m. injection in the lower limb on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. In all cases, the administration of the Dysport® injections was limited to a maximum dose of 1500 U every 12 weeks. Follow up visits were timed to assess the onset and progression of treatment response. From treatment Cycle 3 onwards, subjects with co-existing upper limb spasticity were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® into at least one upper limb muscle at a dose not exceeding 500 U. Dysport® contains the neurotoxin Clostridium botulinum type A toxin-haemagglutinin complex (abobotulinumtoxinA).
345
Total345

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event19
Overall StudyEnd of Study Visit Performed in Error1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyNo Study Drug Available1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudySubject had Personal or Medical Issues4
Overall StudySubject Required Alternative Treatment7
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Dysport®
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
65 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
280 Participants
Age, Continuous53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
311 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
313 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
235 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 345
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 345

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle.

Time frame: Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE - Cycle 421 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE - Cycle 1140 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE - Cycle 297 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE - Cycle 347 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 143 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 223 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 37 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 45 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE - Cycle 113 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE - Cycle 29 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE - Cycle 34 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE - Cycle 42 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to death - Cycle 10 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to death - Cycle 21 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to death - Cycle 31 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to death - Cycle 40 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 18 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 210 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 31 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 40 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESI - Cycle 131 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESI - Cycle 224 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESI - Cycle 310 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESI - Cycle 45 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAE - Cycle 123 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAE - Cycle 214 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAE - Cycle 37 participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAE - Cycle 42 participants
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Cycle 1-10.1 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 24.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Cycle 2-12.2 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 22.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Cycle 3-13.6 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 26.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Cycle 1-0.6 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 16.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Cycle 4-0.6 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 13.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Cycle 23.5 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 18.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Cycle 4-16.5 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 23.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Cycle 2-1.9 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 14.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Cycle 3-3.8 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 16.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Cycle 4-1.8 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 16.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Cycle 14.5 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 20.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Cycle 31.5 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 19.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Cycle 46.1 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 21.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Cycle 1-0.6 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 6.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Cycle 2-0.7 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 5.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Cycle 3-0.8 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 6.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Cycle 4-0.9 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 6.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Cycle 1-2.2 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 14.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Cycle 2-1.7 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 15.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Cycle 3-0.5 Milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 14.4
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

Blood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)ALP - Cycle 1-1.2 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)ALP - Cycle 2-2.9 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)ALP - Cycle 3-5.2 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)ALP - Cycle 4-3.2 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGOT - Cycle 12.7 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGOT - Cycle 23 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGOT - Cycle 31.3 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGOT - Cycle 41.8 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGPT - Cycle 11.2 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGPT - Cycle 22.4 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGPT - Cycle 31.7 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGPT - Cycle 40.8 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)GGT - Cycle 11 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)GGT - Cycle 2-1.9 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)GGT - Cycle 3-3 IU/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)GGT - Cycle 4-0.4 IU/L
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseFasting blood glucose - Cycle 20.009 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseFasting blood glucose - Cycle 30.015 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseFasting blood glucose - Cycle 40.231 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBUN - Cycle 10.14 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBUN - Cycle 2-0.05 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBUN - Cycle 3-0.19 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBUN - Cycle 4-0.37 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseFasting blood glucose - Cycle 1-0.046 millimole/L (mmol/L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit

Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HaematocritCycle 10.001 percentage of RBC in blood
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HaematocritCycle 20.003 percentage of RBC in blood
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HaematocritCycle 3-0.001 percentage of RBC in blood
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HaematocritCycle 4-0.009 percentage of RBC in blood
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Haemoglobin - Cycle 11.2 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Haemoglobin - Cycle 21.5 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Haemoglobin - Cycle 31.5 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Haemoglobin - Cycle 41.2 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)MCHC - Cycle 11.9 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)MCHC - Cycle 21.3 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)MCHC - Cycle 33.4 grams (g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)MCHC - Cycle 48.9 grams (g)/L
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)

HR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)Cycle 13.7 Beats per minute (bpm)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)Cycle 24.9 Beats per minute (bpm)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)Cycle 33.9 Beats per minute (bpm)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)Cycle 44.5 Beats per minute (bpm)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Cycle 40.05 picograms (pg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Cycle 1-0.06 picograms (pg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Cycle 2-0.17 picograms (pg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Cycle 30.00 picograms (pg)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Cycle 1-0.74 Femtolitres (fL)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Cycle 2-0.9 Femtolitres (fL)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Cycle 3-1.02 Femtolitres (fL)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Cycle 4-2.44 Femtolitres (fL)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountCycle 40.028 Tera cells/Litre (L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountCycle 10.049 Tera cells/Litre (L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountCycle 20.074 Tera cells/Litre (L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountCycle 30.046 Tera cells/Litre (L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Systolic BP - Cycle 1-0.7 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Systolic BP - Cycle 2-1.9 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Systolic BP - Cycle 3-2.4 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Systolic BP - Cycle 4-5.1 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Diastolic BP - Cycle 10.3 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Diastolic BP - Cycle 2-0.2 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Diastolic BP - Cycle 3-0.3 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)Diastolic BP - Cycle 4-1.1 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal bilirubin - Cycle 30.03 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal bilirubin - Cycle 4-0.05 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine - Cycle 3-7.9 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal bilirubin - Cycle 10.13 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal bilirubin - Cycle 20.14 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine - Cycle 1-2 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine - Cycle 2-5.3 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine - Cycle 4-14.2 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsWBC count - Cycle 1-0.21 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsWBC count - Cycle 2-0.32 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsWBC count - Cycle 3-0.26 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsWBC count - Cycle 4-0.02 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsNeutrophils - Cycle 1-0.17 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsNeutrophils - Cycle 2-0.27 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsNeutrophils - Cycle 3-0.28 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsNeutrophils - Cycle 4-0.06 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsLymphocytes - Cycle 1-0.05 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsLymphocytes - Cycle 2-0.05 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsLymphocytes - Cycle 30.03 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsLymphocytes - Cycle 4-0.01 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsPlatelets - Cycle 1-0.1 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsPlatelets - Cycle 20.0 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsPlatelets - Cycle 30.1 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsPlatelets - Cycle 44.6 Giga cells/L
Primary

Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®

Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. In addition, the antibody analysis included subjects who had an antibody assessment at baseline and at a post baseline visit (n=343).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Dysport®Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®Positive at baseline3 Participants
Total Dysport®Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®Negative at baseline & positive post baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL

Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLPain/discomfort - Cycle 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLPain/discomfort - Cycle 2-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLPain/discomfort - Cycle 3-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLPain/discomfort - Cycle 4-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLVAS - Cycle 12.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLVAS - Cycle 23.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLVAS - Cycle 34.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoLVAS - Cycle 45.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 12.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 7.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 22.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 7.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 42.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 17.1 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 27.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 11.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 37.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 12.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 49.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 12.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1-4.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2-4.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3-5.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4-6.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.2
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 11.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 22.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 42.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 8.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 16.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 27.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 37.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 11.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 48.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 11.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1-5.0 DegreesStandard Deviation 10
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2-4.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3-5.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4-6.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.23
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.07 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.22
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.22
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.07 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.26
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.28
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.09 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.26
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.11 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.25
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.23
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.09 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.27
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.09 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.27
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CadenceMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.09 steps/sStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain

The intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb PainCycle 1-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb PainCycle 2-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb PainCycle 3-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb PainCycle 4-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)

Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)MCS - Cycle 40.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.23
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)PCS - Cycle 11.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)PCS - Cycle 21.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.67
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)PCS - Cycle 31.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.01
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)PCS - Cycle 42.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.65
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)MCS - Cycle 1-1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.27
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)MCS - Cycle 2-0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)MCS - Cycle 30.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.24
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Cycle 1-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Cycle 2-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Cycle 3-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)Cycle 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 1-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 2-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 3-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 4-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.06
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.08
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.05 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.07
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.08
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.08
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthComfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.04 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.08
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.04 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.02 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.08
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.03 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step LengthMaximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.04 m/stepStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 1-1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 2-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 3-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)Cycle 4-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)Cycle 2-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)Cycle 1-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)Cycle 3-1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)Cycle 4-1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended

Range of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Flexed - Cycle 25 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Extended - Cycle 14.1 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Extended - Cycle 24.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Extended - Cycle 36 DegreesStandard Deviation 11.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Extended - Cycle 46.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Flexed - Cycle 14.1 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Flexed - Cycle 35.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee ExtendedKnee Flexed - Cycle 43.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.8
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.12
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.13
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.08 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.13
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.09 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.14
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.06 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.13
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.07 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.14
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.08 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.13
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.08 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.14
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.16
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.18
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.09 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.18
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.1 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.18
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.17
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.09 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.19
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.09 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.19
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.1 metres/second (m/s)Standard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4

An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4.

Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4Cycle 183.8 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4Cycle 286.2 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4Cycle 389.3 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4Cycle 489.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 223.2 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 156.2 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 257.6 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 360.7 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 466.9 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 118.3 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 323.2 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 422.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 161.4 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 268.4 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 372.3 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 471.9 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 128.4 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 230.6 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 330.4 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 428.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported.

Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 41.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 21.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 31.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4

Subjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1101 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1244 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 199 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 1242 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 284 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 2213 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 280 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 2212 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 356 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 3168 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 359 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 3147 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 440 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 499 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 433 Participants
Total Dysport®Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 464 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026