Post-stroke Spasticity, Spasticity Post-Traumatic Brain Injury
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with lower limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.
Interventions
I.M. (intramuscular) injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Completion of Dysport® Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Double Blind study Y-55-52120-140 (NCT01249404)
Exclusion criteria
* Fixed contractures in lower limb
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks). | Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | HR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport® | At Week 4 | Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | 12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Subjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | Week 4 of each cycle | Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4. |
| Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | Week 4 of each cycle | Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4. |
| Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Week 4 of each cycle | An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4 | Week 4 of each cycle | An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Range of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | The intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle | Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was designed as a multicentre study and included 51 sites in Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America that included at least one subject. The current study (Study 142) was an open label extension to the double blind Study 140 (Y-55-52120-140).
Pre-assignment details
A total of 366 subjects completed Study 140, of which 352 subjects were enrolled in Study 142. Of these, 7 subjects entered an observational phase and never received open label treatment with Dysport® in Study 142 and the remaining 345 subjects started treatment and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® in Study 142.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Total Dysport® Subjects who had completed Study 140 were offered to continue to receive open label treatment with Dysport® in Study 142 for a maximum of 4 additional treatment cycles, with a minimum interval of 12 weeks between treatment cycles. All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1500 U or 1000 U) by i.m. injection in the lower limb on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. In all cases, the administration of the Dysport® injections was limited to a maximum dose of 1500 U every 12 weeks. Follow up visits were timed to assess the onset and progression of treatment response. From treatment Cycle 3 onwards, subjects with co-existing upper limb spasticity were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® into at least one upper limb muscle at a dose not exceeding 500 U. Dysport® contains the neurotoxin Clostridium botulinum type A toxin-haemagglutinin complex (abobotulinumtoxinA). | 345 |
| Total | 345 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 19 |
| Overall Study | End of Study Visit Performed in Error | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 |
| Overall Study | No Study Drug Available | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 |
| Overall Study | Subject had Personal or Medical Issues | 4 |
| Overall Study | Subject Required Alternative Treatment | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 36 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total Dysport® |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 65 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 280 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 53.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 34 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 311 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 21 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 313 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 110 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 235 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 69 / 345 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 43 / 345 |
Outcome results
Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle.
Time frame: Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE - Cycle 4 | 21 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE - Cycle 1 | 140 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE - Cycle 2 | 97 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE - Cycle 3 | 47 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 1 | 43 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 2 | 23 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 3 | 7 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 4 | 5 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAE - Cycle 1 | 13 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAE - Cycle 2 | 9 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAE - Cycle 3 | 4 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAE - Cycle 4 | 2 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to death - Cycle 1 | 0 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to death - Cycle 2 | 1 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to death - Cycle 3 | 1 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to death - Cycle 4 | 0 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 1 | 8 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 2 | 10 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 3 | 1 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 4 | 0 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESI - Cycle 1 | 31 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESI - Cycle 2 | 24 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESI - Cycle 3 | 10 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESI - Cycle 4 | 5 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAE - Cycle 1 | 23 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAE - Cycle 2 | 14 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAE - Cycle 3 | 7 participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAE - Cycle 4 | 2 participants |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Cycle 1 | -10.1 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Cycle 2 | -12.2 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Cycle 3 | -13.6 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 26.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Cycle 1 | -0.6 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Cycle 4 | -0.6 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Cycle 2 | 3.5 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Cycle 4 | -16.5 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Cycle 2 | -1.9 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Cycle 3 | -3.8 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Cycle 4 | -1.8 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Cycle 1 | 4.5 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Cycle 3 | 1.5 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Cycle 4 | 6.1 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Cycle 1 | -0.6 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Cycle 2 | -0.7 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Cycle 3 | -0.8 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Cycle 4 | -0.9 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Cycle 1 | -2.2 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Cycle 2 | -1.7 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Cycle 3 | -0.5 Milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)
Blood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | ALP - Cycle 1 | -1.2 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | ALP - Cycle 2 | -2.9 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | ALP - Cycle 3 | -5.2 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | ALP - Cycle 4 | -3.2 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGOT - Cycle 1 | 2.7 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGOT - Cycle 2 | 3 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGOT - Cycle 3 | 1.3 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGOT - Cycle 4 | 1.8 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGPT - Cycle 1 | 1.2 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGPT - Cycle 2 | 2.4 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGPT - Cycle 3 | 1.7 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGPT - Cycle 4 | 0.8 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | GGT - Cycle 1 | 1 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | GGT - Cycle 2 | -1.9 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | GGT - Cycle 3 | -3 IU/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | GGT - Cycle 4 | -0.4 IU/L |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose
Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 2 | 0.009 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 3 | 0.015 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 4 | 0.231 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | BUN - Cycle 1 | 0.14 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | BUN - Cycle 2 | -0.05 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | BUN - Cycle 3 | -0.19 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | BUN - Cycle 4 | -0.37 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 1 | -0.046 millimole/L (mmol/L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit
Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit | Cycle 1 | 0.001 percentage of RBC in blood |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit | Cycle 2 | 0.003 percentage of RBC in blood |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit | Cycle 3 | -0.001 percentage of RBC in blood |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit | Cycle 4 | -0.009 percentage of RBC in blood |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Haemoglobin - Cycle 1 | 1.2 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Haemoglobin - Cycle 2 | 1.5 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Haemoglobin - Cycle 3 | 1.5 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Haemoglobin - Cycle 4 | 1.2 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | MCHC - Cycle 1 | 1.9 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | MCHC - Cycle 2 | 1.3 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | MCHC - Cycle 3 | 3.4 grams (g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | MCHC - Cycle 4 | 8.9 grams (g)/L |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)
HR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR) | Cycle 1 | 3.7 Beats per minute (bpm) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR) | Cycle 2 | 4.9 Beats per minute (bpm) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR) | Cycle 3 | 3.9 Beats per minute (bpm) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR) | Cycle 4 | 4.5 Beats per minute (bpm) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)
Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Cycle 4 | 0.05 picograms (pg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Cycle 1 | -0.06 picograms (pg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Cycle 2 | -0.17 picograms (pg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Cycle 3 | 0.00 picograms (pg) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Cycle 1 | -0.74 Femtolitres (fL) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Cycle 2 | -0.9 Femtolitres (fL) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Cycle 3 | -1.02 Femtolitres (fL) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Cycle 4 | -2.44 Femtolitres (fL) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Cycle 4 | 0.028 Tera cells/Litre (L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Cycle 1 | 0.049 Tera cells/Litre (L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Cycle 2 | 0.074 Tera cells/Litre (L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Cycle 3 | 0.046 Tera cells/Litre (L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Systolic BP - Cycle 1 | -0.7 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Systolic BP - Cycle 2 | -1.9 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Systolic BP - Cycle 3 | -2.4 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Systolic BP - Cycle 4 | -5.1 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Diastolic BP - Cycle 1 | 0.3 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Diastolic BP - Cycle 2 | -0.2 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Diastolic BP - Cycle 3 | -0.3 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Diastolic BP - Cycle 4 | -1.1 Millimetres Mercury (mmHg) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine
Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Total bilirubin - Cycle 3 | 0.03 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Total bilirubin - Cycle 4 | -0.05 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Creatinine - Cycle 3 | -7.9 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Total bilirubin - Cycle 1 | 0.13 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Total bilirubin - Cycle 2 | 0.14 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Creatinine - Cycle 1 | -2 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Creatinine - Cycle 2 | -5.3 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Creatinine - Cycle 4 | -14.2 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets
Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | WBC count - Cycle 1 | -0.21 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | WBC count - Cycle 2 | -0.32 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | WBC count - Cycle 3 | -0.26 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | WBC count - Cycle 4 | -0.02 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Neutrophils - Cycle 1 | -0.17 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Neutrophils - Cycle 2 | -0.27 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Neutrophils - Cycle 3 | -0.28 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Neutrophils - Cycle 4 | -0.06 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Lymphocytes - Cycle 1 | -0.05 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Lymphocytes - Cycle 2 | -0.05 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Lymphocytes - Cycle 3 | 0.03 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Lymphocytes - Cycle 4 | -0.01 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Platelets - Cycle 1 | -0.1 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Platelets - Cycle 2 | 0.0 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Platelets - Cycle 3 | 0.1 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Platelets - Cycle 4 | 4.6 Giga cells/L |
Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®
Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. In addition, the antibody analysis included subjects who had an antibody assessment at baseline and at a post baseline visit (n=343).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport® | Positive at baseline | 3 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport® | Negative at baseline & positive post baseline | 0 Participants |
Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL
Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | Pain/discomfort - Cycle 1 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | Pain/discomfort - Cycle 2 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | Pain/discomfort - Cycle 3 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | Pain/discomfort - Cycle 4 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | VAS - Cycle 1 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | VAS - Cycle 2 | 3.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | VAS - Cycle 3 | 4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL | VAS - Cycle 4 | 5.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)
Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | 2.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 2.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 2.6 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | 2.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 7.1 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 7.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 7.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 9.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1 | -4.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2 | -4.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3 | -5.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4 | -6.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | 1.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 2.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 2.6 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | 2.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 6.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 7.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 7.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 8.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1 | -5.0 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2 | -4.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3 | -5.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4 | -6.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence
All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.07 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.07 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.07 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.07 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.08 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.09 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.11 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.07 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.09 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.09 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.09 steps/s | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain
The intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain | Cycle 1 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain | Cycle 2 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain | Cycle 3 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain | Cycle 4 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)
Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | MCS - Cycle 4 | 0.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.23 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | PCS - Cycle 1 | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | PCS - Cycle 2 | 1.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.67 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | PCS - Cycle 3 | 1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.01 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | PCS - Cycle 4 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.65 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | MCS - Cycle 1 | -1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.27 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | MCS - Cycle 2 | -0.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) | MCS - Cycle 3 | 0.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.24 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)
Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Cycle 1 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Cycle 2 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Cycle 3 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended) | Cycle 4 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 1 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 2 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 3 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 4 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length
All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.05 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.04 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.04 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.02 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.03 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.04 m/step | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 1 | -1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 2 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 3 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) | Cycle 4 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)
Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended) | Cycle 2 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended) | Cycle 1 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended) | Cycle 3 | -1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended) | Cycle 4 | -1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended
Range of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Flexed - Cycle 2 | 5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Extended - Cycle 1 | 4.1 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Extended - Cycle 2 | 4.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Extended - Cycle 3 | 6 Degrees | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Extended - Cycle 4 | 6.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Flexed - Cycle 1 | 4.1 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Flexed - Cycle 3 | 5.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended | Knee Flexed - Cycle 4 | 3.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)
All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.07 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.08 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.08 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.09 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.06 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.07 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.08 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.08 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 1 | 0.07 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 2 | 0.08 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 3 | 0.09 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 4 | 0.1 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 1 | 0.07 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 2 | 0.09 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 3 | 0.09 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS) | Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 4 | 0.1 metres/second (m/s) | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4
An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4.
Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | 83.8 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | 86.2 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | 89.3 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | 89.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4
Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.
Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 2 | 23.2 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 1 | 56.2 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 2 | 57.6 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 3 | 60.7 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 4 | 66.9 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 1 | 18.3 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 3 | 23.2 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 4 | 22.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4
Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.
Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 1 | 61.4 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 2 | 68.4 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 3 | 72.3 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 4 | 71.9 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 1 | 28.4 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 2 | 30.6 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 3 | 30.4 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4 | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 4 | 28.8 percentage of participants |
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4
An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported.
Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | 1.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | 1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | 1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4
Subjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Population: Subjects who received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were included in this analysis population. The number of subjects with data available for analysis at each treatment cycle are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1 | 101 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1 | 244 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 1 | 99 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 1 | 242 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 2 | 84 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 2 | 213 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 2 | 80 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 2 | 212 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 3 | 56 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 3 | 168 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 3 | 59 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 3 | 147 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 4 | 40 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 4 | 99 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 4 | 33 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4 | Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 4 | 64 Participants |