Skip to content

Histologic Assessment of the Difference Between 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy_D-glucose Positron Emission Mammography(PEM) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Breast

Histologic Assessment of the Difference Between 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy_D-glucose Positron Emission Mammography(PEM) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Breast

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01249157
Enrollment
6
Registered
2010-11-29
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2015-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

MRI, PEM, 10-189

Brief summary

Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) is a newly developed imaging examination of the breast that uses a radioactive glucose based tracer, which is a form of sugar attached to a low radiation agent, to detect cancer cells. The radioactive glucose based tracer is called fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), and it is FDA approved. A PEM scanner is able to better detect cancer cells within the breast, more than a regular PET scanner. The PEM scanner is also FDA approved. This type of imaging may be able to see the breast cancer before it could be seen with mammograms and may be as good as or better than breast MRI. The purpose of this study is to compare the value of FDG Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) with contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the breast for patients with breast cancer. This study will also perform special pathology test to compare the FDG PEM and contrast enhanced breast MRI images with the results from the standard of care breast surgery. This may teach us more about the biology of each breast tumor.

Interventions

DEVICEPositron Emission Mammography (PEM) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

An additional 5 women will be enrolled at the beginning of the study for training purposes only and will not be included in the assessment of this study. Once the patient has had both breast MRI and PEM, the location of each site of potential breast cancer will be listed for each modality. The location of each abnormality on each imaging examination will be documented. Once the histopathologic evaluation has been performed, the pathology results will be compared to the imaging results for each modality. Furthermore, comparison of the performance of MRI and PEM will then be made with the pathological results as the truth. Comparison of the histology and biomarkers in each lesion detected by each modality will be done in order to determine if these factors affect detection by each modality.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients with recently diagnosed invasive or in situ breast cancer by core needle biopsy or FNA (confirmed at MSKCC) prior to enrollment. * Patients planning treatment with mastectomy at MSKCC. * Patients 21 years old or older. * Patients who had or are having a breast MRI within 30 days or less of PEM. * Patients who had or are having a digital mammogram.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding. * Patients with prior radiation therapy or endocrine therapy. * Patients who had a prior lumpectomy. * Patients who are diabetic. * Patients with moderate to end stage kidney disease. * Patients who have a contraindication to MRI (i.e. pacemaker, metallic implants, etc).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Evaluate the Accuracy of Preoperative 18FDG PEM2 yearsusing pathology as the gold standard and descriptively compare it to the accuracy of breast MRI in an exploratory analysis which will generate data for future studies. The first 5 patients who consent to the study were used for training purposes only.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Preoperative 18FDG PEM and MRI
Female patients with recently diagnosed invasive or in situ breast cancer.The first 5 patients who consent to the study will be intended for training purposes only.
1
Total1

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPreoperative 18FDG PEM and MRI
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

To Evaluate the Accuracy of Preoperative 18FDG PEM

using pathology as the gold standard and descriptively compare it to the accuracy of breast MRI in an exploratory analysis which will generate data for future studies. The first 5 patients who consent to the study were used for training purposes only.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: No data displayed because Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026