Skip to content

Local Anesthetic Nebulization and Instillation for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Surgery

Double Blind Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulization of Ropivacaine With Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ropivacaine on Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01248819
Enrollment
60
Registered
2010-11-25
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2010-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Nebulization, Ropivacaine

Brief summary

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic procedures have provided conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a novel intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration technique using nebulization on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic (LA) instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy have provided conflicting results. One of the factors that might contribute to failure of the instillation technique may be related to inadequate distribution of local anesthetic throughout the peritoneal surface. In contrast, nebulization should provide a uniform spread of drugs throughout the peritoneal cavity and thus may be beneficial to improve pain relief after laparoscopic procedures. A recent study reported that bupivacaine nebulization significantly reduced pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with bupivacaine instillation in the gallbladder bed. However, these investigators used a custom-made nebulization system that needs a separate gas source and tubing that is cumbersome and may not be easily available. Recently, the investigators reported that a microvibration-based nebulization device (Aeroneb Pro® system, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) could be used for ropivacaine delivery into the insufflation gas required to create pneumorpeitoneum. The investigators hypothesized that intraperitoneal ropivacaine nebulization would provide superior pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation. This randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro® device laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine 60 mg

Nebulization grou received intraperitoneal instillation of saline 20 ml on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum (total of 60 mg). The first ropivacaine nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports

Instillation group received intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml (100 mg) on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus and intraperitoneal nebulization of normal saline 3 ml before the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum. The first saline nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports

Sponsors

Hôpital de Hautepierre
CollaboratorOTHER
San Gerardo Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA Score I-III * Scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy * Free from pain in preoperative period * Not using analgesic drugs before surgery * Without cognitive impairment or mental retardation * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency/urgency surgery * Postoperative admission in an intensive care unit * Cognitive impairment or mental retardation * Progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS * Seizures or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs * Severe hepatic or renal impairment * Pregnancy or lactation * Allergy to one of the specific drugs under study * Acute infection or inflammatory chronic disease * Alcohol or drug addiction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain48 hoursPostoperative pain was assessed by Visual analgue scale (VAS 0 to 100 points) at rest (static VAS) and after a deep inspiration or cough (dynamic VAS). The proportion of patients with adequate pain control after surgery (dynamic VAS \< 3) will also be assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morphine consumption (mg)Up to 48 hoursThe total dose of morphine at every evaluation after awakening will be quantified using the PACU clinical chart and/or PCA infusers memory display
Time of unassisted walkingUp to 48 hoursUnassisted walking time is defined as the time in hours between PACU discharge and when the patient is able to walk out of his room and back to bed without any assistance.
Hospital morbidityUp to 48 hoursAll complications or adverse effects associated or possibly associated with the interventions under study, surgery or anesthesia will be quantified using the anesthesia charts, surgical charts, surgical database.
Time to hospital discharge48 hoursWe define hospital stay as the elapsed time between surgery and hospital discharge

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026