Skip to content

First-In-Human Trial of the MiStent Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) in Coronary Artery Disease

A First-In-Human Trial of a New Novel DES (MiStent System) With Sirolimus and a Bioabsorbable Polymer for the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Lesions in the Native Coronary Arteries

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01247428
Acronym
DESSOLVE-I
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-11-24
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Drug-eluting Stent, Sirolimus

Brief summary

The DESSOLVE I clinical trial is to assess the safety and performance of the sirolimus-eluting MiStent SES.

Detailed description

The DESSOLVE I clinical trial is to assess the safety and performance of the sirolimus-eluting MiStent for the treatment for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease due to discrete de novo lesions \< 20 mm in length in the native coronary arteries with reference vessel diameters between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm.

Interventions

DEVICEMiStent SES

The MiStent SES is a device/drug combination comprised of two components; a stent and a drug product (sirolimus within an absorbable polymer coating).

Sponsors

Micell Technologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male/female patients 18-85 years; 2. Stable or unstable angina pectoris, ischemia, or silent ischemia; 3. Planned single, de novo, types A, B1 and B2 coronary lesions; 4. Target lesion located in a native coronary artery; 5. Target lesion vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.5 mm amenable to treatment with a maximum 23 mm long stent; 6. Target lesion \>50% diameter stenosis; 7. Patients eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); 8. Acceptable candidate for myocardial revascularization surgery; 9. A patient may have one additional critical non-target lesion. 10. The patient will provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female of childbearing potential not on some form of birth control with a confirmed negative pregnancy test at baseline; 2. Recent Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred \<72 hours prior to the index procedure. Recent myocardial infarction with elevated levels of cardiac markers; 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%; 4. Patients in cardiogenic shock; 5. Cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 6 months; 6. Active GI bleed within three months; 7. Any prior true anaphylactic reaction to contrast agents; 8. Patient receiving/scheduled to receive chemotherapy within 30-days before or after the index procedure; 9. Patient is receiving immunosuppressive therapy or has known life-limiting immunosuppressive/autoimmune disease; 10. Renal dysfunction (creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL or 177 µmol/L); 11. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm³ or \>700,000 cells/mm³; 12. White blood cell count \<3,000 cells/mm3; 13. Hepatic disease; 14. Heart transplant recipient; 15. Known contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy; 16. Known hypersensitivity to sirolimus, cobalt-chromium, or to medications such as aspirin, heparin, and all three of the following: clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix), ticlopidine (Ticlid), and Prasugrel (Effient); 17. Life expectancy \<12 months; 18. Any major medical condition that may interfere with the optimal participation of the patient in this study; 19. Patient is currently participating/planning to participate in an investigational drug or another device study prior to completing 12-months follow-up; 20. Target vessel(s) has been treated within 10 mm proximal or distal to target lesion with any type of PCI within a year prior to index procedure; 21. Planned or actual target vessel(s) treatment with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, cutting balloon, or transluminal extraction catheter prior to stent placement; 22. Previous coronary intravascular brachytherapy; 23. Planned coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)in the first 9 months after the index procedure; 24. Prior PCI of a non-target vessel must be at least 30 days prior to study enrollment; 25. The intent to direct stent the target lesion; 26. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic In-Stent Late Lumen Loss8 monthsIn-stent late lumen loss as measured by the angiographic core laboratory as the difference between the post-procedure minimal lumen diameters (MLD) in the treated segment (stented region) minus the MLD in the same region at follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Success8 hoursAchievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA), using the assigned device only
Lesion Success8 hoursAchievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method
Procedural Success8 hoursAchievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA) using the assigned device (including any adjunctive devices) without cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization of the target lesion pre-hospital discharge
Total Mortality240 daysTotal mortality (cardiac and non-cardiac)
Total Myocardial Infarction (MI)240 days1. Q-wave MI (QWMI): requires one of the following criteria: the development of new abnormal Q waves in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads not present on the patient's baseline (i.e., before intervention) in association with a \>2x upper limit normal elevation of creatine kinase (CK) levels. In the absence of ECG data, the clinical events committee may adjudicate a Q-wave MI based on the clinical scenario and appropriate cardiac enzyme data; chest pain or other acute symptoms consistent with myocardial ischemia and new pathological Q waves in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads in the absence of timely cardiac enzyme data. 2. Non-Q-wave MI (NQWMI): the elevation of CK levels (≥2 times ULN) with elevated CK-MB enzyme levels in the absence of new pathologic Q waves.
Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rates240 daysA revascularization is considered clinically driven if angiography at follow-up shows a percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (Angiographic Core Laboratory QCA assessment) and if one of the following occurs: 1. A positive history of recurrent angina pectoris, presumably related to the target vessel; 2. Objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent), presumably related to the target vessel; 3. Abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (e.g., Doppler flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve); 4. A target lesion revascularization (TLR) with a diameter stenosis ≥ 70% even in the absence of the above-mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.
Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Rates240 daysA revascularization is considered clinically driven if angiography at follow-up shows a percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (Angiographic Core Laboratory QCA assessment) and if one of the following occurs: 1. A positive history of recurrent angina pectoris, presumably related to the target vessel; 2. Objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent), presumably related to the target vessel; 3. Abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (e.g., Doppler flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve); 4. A target vessel revascularization (TVR) with a diameter stenosis ≥ 70% even in the absence of the above-mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)240 daysMajor Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)240 daysTarget lesion failure (TLF) is defined as the composite endpoint of: * cardiac death, * target-lesion myocardial infarction (Q wave or non-Q wave), and * clinically indicated target lesion revascularization
Stent Thrombosis240 daysThe presence of an intracoronary thrombus that originates in the stent or in the segments 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent post-procedure
Angiographic Evaluation: In-stent Binary Restenosis4 months, 6 months, 8 monthsBinary Restenosis is defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing at follow-up angiography.
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction8 months% neointimal volume obstruction is defined as the neointimal volume divided by stent volume.
IVUS Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction18 months% neointimal volume obstruction is defined as the neointimal volume divided by stent volume.
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered8 months% stent strut uncovered is defined as the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all cross-sections.
OCT Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered18 M% stent strut uncovered is defined as the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all cross-sections.
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)240 daysTarget vessel failure (TVF) is defined as the composite endpoint of: * cardiac death, * target-vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave or non-Q wave), and * clinically indicated target vessel revascularization

Countries

Australia, Belgium, New Zealand

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MiStent SES
The MiStent is a device/drug combination comprised of two components; a stent and a drug product (sirolimus within an absorbable polymer coating).
30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMiStent SES
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95
Gender
Female
8 Participants
Gender
Male
22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
17 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Angiographic In-Stent Late Lumen Loss

In-stent late lumen loss as measured by the angiographic core laboratory as the difference between the post-procedure minimal lumen diameters (MLD) in the treated segment (stented region) minus the MLD in the same region at follow-up.

Time frame: 8 months

Population: Last observation used, such that patients (n=10) in the 8 month analysis is reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MiStent SESAngiographic In-Stent Late Lumen Loss0.09 mmStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Angiographic Evaluation: In-stent Binary Restenosis

Binary Restenosis is defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing at follow-up angiography.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Population includes participants from whom data was collected.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESAngiographic Evaluation: In-stent Binary Restenosis0 participants
Secondary

Angiographic Evaluation: In-stent Binary Restenosis

Binary Restenosis is defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing at follow-up angiography.

Time frame: 4 months, 6 months, 8 months

Population: Patients evaluated at 4(n=10), 6(n=10) and 8(n=10) months.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESAngiographic Evaluation: In-stent Binary Restenosis0 participants
Secondary

Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rates

A revascularization is considered clinically driven if angiography at follow-up shows a percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (Angiographic Core Laboratory QCA assessment) and if one of the following occurs: 1. A positive history of recurrent angina pectoris, presumably related to the target vessel; 2. Objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent), presumably related to the target vessel; 3. Abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (e.g., Doppler flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve); 4. A target lesion revascularization (TLR) with a diameter stenosis ≥ 70% even in the absence of the above-mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESClinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rates0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Rates

A revascularization is considered clinically driven if angiography at follow-up shows a percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (Angiographic Core Laboratory QCA assessment) and if one of the following occurs: 1. A positive history of recurrent angina pectoris, presumably related to the target vessel; 2. Objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent), presumably related to the target vessel; 3. Abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (e.g., Doppler flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve); 4. A target vessel revascularization (TVR) with a diameter stenosis ≥ 70% even in the absence of the above-mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESClinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Rates0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Device Success

Achievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA), using the assigned device only

Time frame: 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESDevice Success96.67 percentage of participants
Secondary

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction

% neointimal volume obstruction is defined as the neointimal volume divided by stent volume.

Time frame: 8 months

Population: Patients evaluated at 4(n=10), 6(n=10) and 8(n=10) months. Only 25/30 patients had evaluable IVUS data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MiStent SESIntravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction8.0 percentage of volume obstructionStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

IVUS Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction

% neointimal volume obstruction is defined as the neointimal volume divided by stent volume.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: 20 out of 30 participants analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MiStent SESIVUS Evaluation: % Neointimal Volume Obstruction11.2 percentage of volume obstructionStandard Deviation 8.1
Secondary

Lesion Success

Achievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method

Time frame: 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESLesion Success100 percentage of participants
Secondary

OCT Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered

% stent strut uncovered is defined as the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all cross-sections.

Time frame: 18 M

Population: 27 out of 30 patients analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MiStent SESOCT Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered0 percentage of struts uncovered
Secondary

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered

% stent strut uncovered is defined as the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all cross-sections.

Time frame: 8 months

Population: Patients evaluated at 4(n=10), 6(n=10) and 8(n=10) months. Only 9/30 patients had evaluable OCT at the 8 month timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
MiStent SESOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Evaluation: % Stent Strut Uncovered3.8 percentage of struts uncoveredFull Range 2.87
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESPercentage of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)3.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Procedural Success

Achievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QCA) using the assigned device (including any adjunctive devices) without cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization of the target lesion pre-hospital discharge

Time frame: 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESProcedural Success100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

The presence of an intracoronary thrombus that originates in the stent or in the segments 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent post-procedure

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESStent Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as the composite endpoint of: * cardiac death, * target-lesion myocardial infarction (Q wave or non-Q wave), and * clinically indicated target lesion revascularization

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target vessel failure (TVF) is defined as the composite endpoint of: * cardiac death, * target-vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave or non-Q wave), and * clinically indicated target vessel revascularization

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESTarget Vessel Failure (TVF)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Mortality

Total mortality (cardiac and non-cardiac)

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESTotal Mortality0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Myocardial Infarction (MI)

1. Q-wave MI (QWMI): requires one of the following criteria: the development of new abnormal Q waves in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads not present on the patient's baseline (i.e., before intervention) in association with a \>2x upper limit normal elevation of creatine kinase (CK) levels. In the absence of ECG data, the clinical events committee may adjudicate a Q-wave MI based on the clinical scenario and appropriate cardiac enzyme data; chest pain or other acute symptoms consistent with myocardial ischemia and new pathological Q waves in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads in the absence of timely cardiac enzyme data. 2. Non-Q-wave MI (NQWMI): the elevation of CK levels (≥2 times ULN) with elevated CK-MB enzyme levels in the absence of new pathologic Q waves.

Time frame: 240 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MiStent SESTotal Myocardial Infarction (MI)3.3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026