Skip to content

Smith & Nephew's European Trufit Study

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study Comparing the Trufit CB (Cartilage Bone) Implant to Microfracture for the Treatment of Patients With Single, Isolated Defects of the Knee

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01246635
Enrollment
153
Registered
2010-11-23
Start date
2008-04-15
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Defect of Articular Cartilage

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of the Trufit CB (Cartilage Bone) implant for the treatment of single, isolated cartilage defects of the knee compared to Microfracture.

Detailed description

Up to 315 subjects, ages 18 years and older with a single, isolated cartilage defect of the knee will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment groups: * Trufit CB Implant with rehabilitation protocol; * Trufit CB Implant with rehabilitation protocol; * Microfracture with rehabilitation protocol Rehabilitation program may be standard (6 weeks touch weight to full weight bearing) or accelerated (2 weeks touch weight to full weight bearing).

Interventions

DEVICETrufit CB (Cartilage Bone) Implant

Implantation of 5,7, 9, or 11 mm Trufit CB Implants for small cartilage lesions. A maximum of two Trufit CB plugs may be implanted.

PROCEDUREMicrofracture if the knee

Creation of small holes through subchondral bone with the goal of stimulating cartilage growth

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Capable of providing informed consent; * Eighteen (18) years or older and skeletally mature on the date of study enrollment; * Willing and able to attend all follow up visits and complete all study related procedures and evaluations including, but not limited to adhering to the rehabilitation protocol; * Single, isolated cartilage defect (ICRS Grade III - IV) in the knee (medial or lateral femoral condyle or trochlea) that is ≥ 1cm2 (10 mm) and ≤ 2cm2 (20 mm) in area and requiring a maximum of 2 implants (if randomized to TRUFIT CB); Note: Lesion size should be assessed as the product of the longest diameter and its perpendicular applied at the widest portion of the lesion. * Candidate for cartilage repair surgery as a result of a single, isolated symptomatic cartilage lesion; * Presents with stable health at the time of study enrollment; * BMI of ≤ 32.

Exclusion criteria

* Female of child-bearing potential who is pregnant or plans to become pregnant over the course of the study; * History of alcohol or drug abuse; * Presents with patellofemoral instability or other anatomical malalignment in the study knee; * Any diagnosis that would preclude the patient from successfully completing the study rehabilitation protocols; * Unable or unwilling to follow post operative procedures (e.g. rehabilitation protocol); * Received one or more intra-articular steroid injections in the study knee within the previous 3 months; * Presents with ipsilateral hip disease, as determined by pain or restricted range of motion upon physical examination; * Treated with either an investigational device or drug within one (1) month of study enrollment, or plans to be treated with an investigational device or drug in the next 24 months; * Diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (Bechterew syndrome), or calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate disease(chondrocalcinosis); * History of severe vascular or neurological disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or is immunosuppressed (e.g. HIV positive); * Musculoskeletal disease, including degenerative bone diseases such as osteochondritis dissecans and osteonecrosis; * Pathologic conditions of the bone (e.g. osteoporosis, cystic changes, hyperparathyroidism, Paget's Disease, hypercalcemia, prolonged use of steroids); * Active infection, or evidence thereof, at the lesion site; * Requires the use of any medication(s) or treatment(s) known to have an effect on bone metabolism (e.g. bisphosphonates, chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive agents); * Requires concomitant osteotomy, partial lateral meniscectomy or complete meniscectomy; Note: Concomitant ACL reconstruction or revision, as well as meniscal repair and partial medial meniscectomies are permitted under the study protocol. * Has undergone an ACL reconstruction, osteotomy, chondral resurfacing procedure or partial meniscectomy (≤ central third of the meniscus) in the last year and has not completed at least 6 months of rehabilitation since such surgery; Note: Patients who have undergone these procedures within the last year and have completed at least 6 months of rehabilitation are eligible to participate in the study. * Any active, implanted medical device (e.g. cochlear implant) or metallic implant (other then dental work) that may interfere with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); * Any condition (e.g. claustrophobia) that may interfere with the patient's ability to undergo MRI; * Diagnosis requiring placement of an active implant (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator, etc.) within the next 24 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent change in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from baseline6 months post-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive change in activity level from baseline to each visit, as measured by the Tegner Activity Scale at all time-points.2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure
Difference in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale from baseline at all post operative time-points.2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure
Magnetic resonance evaluation of cartilage and underlying bone using the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scale12 and 24 months post-procedure
Percent improvement from baseline in the KOOS Knee Survey Score at all time-points2 weeks, 6, weeks, 3 months, (6 months - primary measure), 12 months and 24 months post-procedure
Histological evaluation of cartilage24 months post-procedureHistological characterization of cartilage will only occur for those subjects consenting to both the second look arthroscopy and biopsy at 24-months post-procedure.
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure
Proportion of subjects (compared to baseline) with cartilage classifications within the four groups defined by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scoring system24 months post-procedureEvaluation of cartilage at 24 months post-procedure will only occur for subjects who consent to a second-look biopsy.

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026