Skip to content

Chemotherapy or Observation in Stage I-II Intermediate or High Risk Endometrial Cancer

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Postoperative Chemotherapy or no Further Treatment for Patients With Node-negative Stage I-II Intermediate or High Risk Endometrial Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01244789
Enrollment
244
Registered
2010-11-19
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2028-07-01
Last updated
2025-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

endometrial cancer, chemotherapy, carboplatin, paclitaxel, Stage 1 & 2, node-negative, intermediate risk, high risk

Brief summary

Patients with stage 1 & 2 endometrial cancer are treated with surgery. Despite the fact that disease is confound to uterus, unfortunately some of these patients may relapse and die of their disease. Postoperative radiotherapy cannot improve survival. Chemotherapy has shown survival benefit in more advanced stage disease (stage 3 & 4). This study evaluates if one can improve survival in intermediate and high risk early-stage patients by offering them postoperative chemotherapy. This is a randomized phase 3 trial where effect of postoperative chemotherapy is compared with postoperative observation alone (standard strategy). Substudy: Translational research

Detailed description

Patients with medium and high risk stage I and II endometrial cancers have, despite radical surgery, a rather high risk for progression. Adjuvant radiotherapy was the traditional therapy for many decades. Four randomized phase III studies and a meta-analysis have revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control at the cost of excessive short and long term toxicity, though has absolutely no impact on survival. Two phase III studies have randomized between adjuvant radiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy, both failed to show any difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though both studies are criticized for inferior chemotherapy regimens or inclusion of good prognosis patients. The GOG-122 study on more advanced cases (stage 3 & 4) randomized between combination chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation and found significant improvement in survival in the chemotherapy arm. NSGO-EC-9501 and MaNGO studies have indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy added to adjuvant radiotherapy may improve survival compared to adjuvant radiotherapy alone in early stage medium and high risk patients. One may conclude that impact on survival comes only from chemotherapy. Many investigators have therefore adapted adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment in various countries including Denmark. However, such conclusion has low level of evidence, as there are no randomized phase III studies comparing postoperative observation alone versus adjuvant chemotherapy. It is of utmost importance to demonstrate efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy in a randomized phase III trial comparing to no further treatment in the medium and high risk node negative stage 1 & 2 patients. Combination chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin is proposed in this study, as this combination is effective and well tolerated. The eligible patients for such a study are a fraction of patients with endometrial cancer therefore this study will be performed within the ENGOT collaboration.

Interventions

6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2

OTHERobservation

active observation

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
CollaboratorNETWORK
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Austria
CollaboratorOTHER
North Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit
CollaboratorOTHER
Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology group (MaNGO)
CollaboratorOTHER
Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Central and Eastern European Oncology Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Danish Gynecological Cancer Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Target Population 1. Only node-negative patients are eligible: Histological confirmed endometrial carcinoma with no macroscopic remaining tumour after primary surgery and lymph-node negative disease, with one of the following postoperative FIGO 2009 stage and grade: 1. Stage I grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma 2. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma 3. Stage I and II type 2 histology (clear cell, serous, squamous cell carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma) Prior therapy 2. Patients have undergone hysterectomy (total abdominal hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LNE). 3. LNE: minimum 12 pelvic nodes (6 from each side) should be removed. Para-aortic LNE is optional 4. Omentectomy strongly recommended in clear cell, serous or undifferentiated carcinoma. 5. Surgery performed within 10 weeks of randomization. If the dates for hysterectomy and lymph node dissection are different, 10 weeks are counted from the last surgery, and in that case the gap between two surgeries should not exceed 8 weeks. Other inclusion criteria 6. Patients must give informed consent according to the rules and regulations of the individual participating centres 7. Patients have not received any other anticancer therapy other than surgery. 8. Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is permitted in both arms. In chemotherapy arm, timing of VBT should not cause delay in chemotherapy delivery. 9. Patients must have a WHO performance status of 0-2 10. Patients must have an adequate bone-marrow, renal and hepatic function (WBC ≥3.0x109/L, neutrophils ≥1.5x109/L, platelets ≥100x109/L, total S-bilirubin \<2 x upper normal value, ALAT \<2.5 x upper normal value, estimated GFR \>50 ml/min (measured or calculated according to Cockroft-Gault or Jeliffe). Up to 5% deviation for hematological values and 10% deviation for s-bilirubin and ALAT are tolerated. 11. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks 12. Patients must be fit to receive combination chemotherapy 13. Patient's age \>18 years

Exclusion criteria

Target Disease Exceptions 1. Carcinosarcoma, Sarcomas or small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies 2. External Beam Radiotherapy 3. Concurrent cancer therapy 4. Concurrent treatment with an anticancer investigational agent or participation in another anticancer clinical trial Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalMay 2017To detect an overall absolute difference in five-year survival of 10%, from 72% to 82%, at the 2.5% level with 80% power, 135 deaths corresponding to 644 patients are needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 5%, 678 patients have to be accrued, leaving 644 patients for the overall analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Specific SurvivalMay 2017Exploratory endpoint
Progression-Free SurvivalMay 2017Exploratory endpoint
Toxicity - Acute toxicity (0-6 months from randomization). Late toxicity is registered during whole study period.May 2017Acute toxicity (0-6 months from randomization). Late toxicity is registered during whole study period. Exploratory endpoint
QOL, EORTC QLQ-30May 2017EORTC QLQ-30
Overall Survival in endometrioid subgroupMay 2017In the endometrioid subgroup an absolute difference in five-year survival of 12%, from 74% to 86% is expected. Assuming this, 79 deaths corresponding to 438 patients are needed to yield 80% power at the 2.5% level. Assuming a dropout rate of 5%, 678 patients have to be accrued, leaving 644 patients for the overall analysis and 75% of these, or 483 patients, for the analysis in the endometrioid subgroup.
Rate of isolated pelvic relapseMay 2017Exploratory endpoint
Rate of isolated distant relapseMay 2017Exploratory endpoint
Rate of mixed (local & distant) relapsesMay 2017Exploratory endpoint
EORTC QLQ-EN-24may 2017QLQ EORTC QLQ-EN-24

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026