Intestinal Behçet's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Behçet's, intestinal
Brief summary
To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Intestinal Behçet's disease * Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region * Patients who have failed conventional treatment
Exclusion criteria
* Crohn's disease * History of ileocecal resection * History of tuberculosis (TB) * Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24 | 24 weeks | Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 | 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. |
| Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented. |
| Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). |
| Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented. |
| Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52 | 52 weeks | Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks | The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). |
| Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL. |
| Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | 24 weeks, 52 weeks | Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared). |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Adalimumab Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan. | 20 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 |
| Overall Study | Anti-adalimumab antibody positive | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Adalimumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33 |
| Age, Customized <40 years | 11 participants |
| Age, Customized >=65 years | 2 participants |
| Age, Customized Between 40 and 65 years | 7 participants |
| Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 0 | 2 participants |
| Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 1 | 1 participants |
| Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 2 | 3 participants |
| Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 3 | 10 participants |
| Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 4 | 4 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Eye (Uveitis) Grade 0 | 20 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Eye (Uveitis) Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Eye (Uveitis) Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Eye (Uveitis) Grade 3 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Oral Aphthous Grade 0 | 5 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Oral Aphthous Grade 1 | 8 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Oral Aphthous Grade 2 | 3 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Oral Aphthous Grade 3 | 4 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 0 | 12 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 1 | 4 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 2 | 1 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 3 | 3 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 0 | 17 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 1 | 1 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 3 | 2 participants |
| Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 0 | 4 participants |
| Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 1 | 6 participants |
| Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 3 | 9 participants |
| Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 4 | 1 participants |
| Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 1 | 1 participants |
| Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 2 | 4 participants |
| Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 3 | 12 participants |
| Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade Grade 4 | 3 participants |
| C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | 0.8 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17 |
| Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade Grade 3 | 15 participants |
| Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade Grade 4 | 5 participants |
| Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) | 140.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.18 |
| Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer >=1 cm to <2 cm | 8 participants |
| Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer >=2 cm to <3 cm | 5 participants |
| Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer >=3 cm | 7 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants |
| Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores Mental Component Summary | 34.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 |
| Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores Physical Component Summary | 41.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 20 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 20 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24 | 9 participants |
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24 | 37.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 40 |
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 41.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 41.91 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Summary Score (Physical Component) | 7.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.18 |
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Summary Score (Mental Component) | 8.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.85 |
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Summary Score (Physical Component) | 9.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.42 |
| Adalimumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Summary Score (Mental Component) | 9.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.27 |
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24 | -0.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Adalimumab | Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52 | -0.2 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.22 |
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). n=number of participants who had any symptom at baseline. Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Abdominal Pain Grade ≤1; n=18 | 11 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Diarrhea Grade ≤1; n=16 | 13 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Other GI Symptom Grade ≤1; n=20 | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24:Abdominal Pain Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=18 | 14 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Diarrhea Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=16 | 11 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24:Other GI Symptom Improvement ≥1 Grade;n=20 | 18 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Abdominal Pain Grade ≤1; n=18 | 14 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Diarrhea Grade ≤1; n=16 | 15 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Other GI Symptom Grade ≤1; n=20 | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52:Abdominal Pain Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=18 | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Diarrhea Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=16 | 13 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52:Other GI Symptom Improvement ≥1 Grade;n=20 | 18 participants |
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Grade 0 | 9 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Grade ≤1 | 13 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Improvement of ≥1 Grade | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Grade 0 | 9 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Grade ≤1 | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Improvement of ≥1 Grade | 18 participants |
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24 | 4 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 4 participants |
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Grade 0 | 9 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Grade ≤1 | 12 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Grade ≤2 | 15 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Grade 0 | 11 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Grade ≤1 | 13 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Grade ≤2 | 15 participants |
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52 | 12 participants |
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (all participants). n=number of participants who had any symptom at baseline. Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Oral Aphthous; n=15 | 10 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Skin (Erythema nodosum rash); n=8 | 6 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Eye (Uveitis); n=0 | 0 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 24: Vulval (Genital) Ulcer; n=3 | 2 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Oral Aphthous; n=15 | 10 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Skin (Erythema nodosum rash); n=8 | 7 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Eye (Uveitis); n=0 | 0 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52 | Week 52: Vulval (Genital) Ulcer; n=3 | 2 participants |