Skip to content

A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

A Multi-Center Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01243671
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-11-18
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intestinal Behçet's Disease

Keywords

Behçet's, intestinal

Brief summary

To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Sponsors

Eisai Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intestinal Behçet's disease * Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region * Patients who have failed conventional treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Crohn's disease * History of ileocecal resection * History of tuberculosis (TB) * Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 2424 weeksMarked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 5224 weeks, 52 weeksComplete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 5224 weeks, 52 weeksStudy participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 5224 weeks, 52 weeksEndoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 5224 weeks, 52 weeksParticipants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 5252 weeksMarked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeksInflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeksThe Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeksC-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 5224 weeks, 52 weeksInvestigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adalimumab
Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyAnti-adalimumab antibody positive1
Overall StudyOther1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumab
Age, Continuous42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33
Age, Customized
<40 years
11 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
2 participants
Age, Customized
Between 40 and 65 years
7 participants
Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 0
2 participants
Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 1
1 participants
Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 2
3 participants
Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 3
10 participants
Assessment of Abdominal Pain (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 4
4 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Eye (Uveitis) Grade 0
20 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Eye (Uveitis) Grade 1
0 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Eye (Uveitis) Grade 2
0 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Eye (Uveitis) Grade 3
0 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Oral Aphthous Grade 0
5 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Oral Aphthous Grade 1
8 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Oral Aphthous Grade 2
3 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Oral Aphthous Grade 3
4 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 0
12 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 1
4 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 2
1 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Skin (Erythema Nodosum Rash) Grade 3
3 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 0
17 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 1
1 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 2
0 participants
Assessment of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than GI Symptoms) Grade
Vulval (Genital) Ulcer Grade 3
2 participants
Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 0
4 participants
Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 1
6 participants
Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 2
0 participants
Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 3
9 participants
Assessment of Diarrhea (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 4
1 participants
Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 0
0 participants
Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 1
1 participants
Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 2
4 participants
Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 3
12 participants
Assessment of Other Symptoms (GI Symptom Component) Grade
Grade 4
3 participants
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)0.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17
Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade
Grade 0
0 participants
Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade
Grade 1
0 participants
Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade
Grade 2
0 participants
Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade
Grade 3
15 participants
Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade
Grade 4
5 participants
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)140.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.18
Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer
>=1 cm to <2 cm
8 participants
Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer
>=2 cm to <3 cm
5 participants
Longest Diameter of Ileocecal Largest Open Ulcer
>=3 cm
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores
Mental Component Summary
34.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores
Physical Component Summary
41.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24

Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 249 participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 2437.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 5241.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.91
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52

The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Summary Score (Physical Component)7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Summary Score (Mental Component)8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.85
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Summary Score (Physical Component)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.42
AdalimumabMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Summary Score (Mental Component)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed by last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabMedian Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24-0.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.27
AdalimumabMedian Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52-0.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.22
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52

Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.

Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). n=number of participants who had any symptom at baseline. Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Abdominal Pain Grade ≤1; n=1811 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Diarrhea Grade ≤1; n=1613 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Other GI Symptom Grade ≤1; n=2016 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24:Abdominal Pain Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=1814 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Diarrhea Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=1611 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24:Other GI Symptom Improvement ≥1 Grade;n=2018 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Abdominal Pain Grade ≤1; n=1814 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Diarrhea Grade ≤1; n=1615 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Other GI Symptom Grade ≤1; n=2016 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52:Abdominal Pain Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=1816 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Diarrhea Improvement ≥1 Grade; n=1613 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52:Other GI Symptom Improvement ≥1 Grade;n=2018 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52

Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.

Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Grade 09 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Grade ≤113 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Improvement of ≥1 Grade16 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Grade 09 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Grade ≤116 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Improvement of ≥1 Grade18 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52

Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.

Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52Week 244 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52Week 524 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52

Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).

Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Grade 09 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Grade ≤112 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Grade ≤215 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Grade 011 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Grade ≤113 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Grade ≤215 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52

Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to \<2 cm, ≥2 cm to \<3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 5212 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52

Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).

Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (all participants). n=number of participants who had any symptom at baseline. Those with missing evaluations were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Oral Aphthous; n=1510 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Skin (Erythema nodosum rash); n=86 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Eye (Uveitis); n=00 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 24: Vulval (Genital) Ulcer; n=32 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Oral Aphthous; n=1510 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Skin (Erythema nodosum rash); n=87 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Eye (Uveitis); n=00 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52Week 52: Vulval (Genital) Ulcer; n=32 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026