Labor Pain, Pregnancy
Conditions
Keywords
Pregnancy, Labor, Epidural Analgesia, Epidural Anesthesia, Spinal Anesthesia, Ultrasound, Neuraxial Analgesia, Neuraxial Anesthesia, Cesarean delivery
Brief summary
The investigators are interested in determining the utility of ultrasound of the spine for labor epidurals or spinal anesthesia for women in labor or having a cesarean delivery. The investigators hypothesized that in women with poor spinal landmarks that the use of ultrasound of the spine will improve the process of placing labor epidurals or spinal anesthetics
Detailed description
Ultrasound has been in use for peripheral regional anesthesia for several years and is becoming more common. It is currently routinely used here at the University of Missouri. Ultrasound for neuraxial anesthesia, however, is less common and is only being done in a few centers.. There have been several case reports of its use in obstetric anesthesia for patients with prior spinal surgery or spinal deformity. There have been even few prospective randomized studies. While its use may have significant advantages, it is not yet clear what those advantages are and in whom it may be most beneficial. The investigators seek to answer the following questions regarding the use of preprocedure ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia in obstetric patients: * Are there benefits to the use of pre procedure ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia? * If so, what are the benefits? * If measurable, to what extent does the patient benefit? * Do all patients benefit or only a specific subgroup? * Is there a cost to the use of pre procedure ultrasound, i.e. extra time needed to perform the ultrasound exam vs a savings with the use of pre procedure ultrasound, i.e., less time to perform the epidural analgesic or spinal anesthetic as a direct result of the use of ultrasound? * In particular the investigators hypothesize that in patients whose spinal landmarks are not palpable or are barely palpable, ultrasound will be found to be beneficial as determined by metrics described below (see item #6). In patients whose landmarks are prominent or easily palpable pre procedure ultrasound will not be of significant benefit.
Interventions
DEVICEUltrasound
Ultrasound examination of the lumbar spine. The level of the lumbar interspace will be determined by the oblique/sagittal method. The transverse method will be used to determine the best lumbar interspace and the distance from the skin to the target (epidural space or intrathecal space)
Sponsors
University of Missouri-Columbia
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Women in labor * Women scheduled for cesarean delivery
Exclusion criteria
* Under age 18 * Emergency cesarean deliveries * Unable to cooperate with ultrasound examination or regional anesthesia * Advanced labor * Contraindications to regional anesthesia * Unable to understand the consent process
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of attempts needed for proper needle placement | 30 min or less | An attempt is defined as a separate needle puncture. A needle pass is defined as the passage of a needle through a single puncture site |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time | 30 min | The time for performance of an ultrasound exam as well as the time for needle placement for labor epidurals or spinal anesthesia |
| Patient Satisfaction | 30 min | Patients will be given a questionaire grading their satisfaction on a 1 to 5 scale 1-very unsatisfied, 5-very satisfied |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed