Skip to content

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Static-Progressive Versus Dynamic Splinting for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Static-Progressive Versus Dynamic Splinting for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01241916
Enrollment
66
Registered
2010-11-16
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2012-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-traumatic Stiff Elbows

Keywords

elbow, splint

Brief summary

Primary Question: When splinting is used to improve motion in post-traumatic stiff elbows, is there a significant difference in gains in motion achieved between static progressive or dynamic splint approaches? Secondary Question: Is there a significant difference in patient compliance with static progressive versus dynamic splint use, and does this effect final ulnohumeral motion outcomes?

Interventions

DEVICEStatic-Progressive Splint

Static progressive splinting is a well-established adjunct for restoring elbow motion. Such splints apply a static stress relaxation force to the elbow tissues, which is sequentially increased, as motion is achieved.

Dynamic splints are a popular alternative, and apply a constant prolonged force to the tissues as additional motion is achieved.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients with post-traumatic elbow contractures in the Hand and Upper Extremity Service at Massachusetts General Hospital are eligible to for enrollment in this study regardless of sex, race or ethnicity.

Exclusion criteria

* Only English speaking patients will be eligible for the study since questionnaires have not been validated in other languages. * Vulnerable populations will not be recruited.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Arc of Flexion and Extensionbaseline and 6 monthsActive ulnohumeral motion will be measured using a hand-held goniometer by the co-investigator not involved in the care of the patient at enrollment and 6 months after enrollment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire12 monthsThe DASH questionnaire measures arm-specific perceived disability. It contains 30 items and is scaled between zero and 100 with higher scores indicating worse upper-extremity function.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Static-progressive Splint
Splint is worn three times per day for a 30-minute period. This splint uses stepwise increases in angle to apply force to contracted tissues that dissipates as the tissues stretch.
35
Dynamic Splint
Splint is worn for approximately 6 to 8 continuous hours per day or night. This splint applies a consistent force to the tissues that is maintained as the tissues stretch.
31
Total66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDynamic SplintStatic-progressive SplintTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants34 Participants64 Participants
Age Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants35 participants66 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants22 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Arc of Flexion and Extension

Active ulnohumeral motion will be measured using a hand-held goniometer by the co-investigator not involved in the care of the patient at enrollment and 6 months after enrollment.

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Static-progressive SplintChange in Arc of Flexion and Extension39 Degrees
Dynamic SplintChange in Arc of Flexion and Extension40 Degrees
Secondary

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

The DASH questionnaire measures arm-specific perceived disability. It contains 30 items and is scaled between zero and 100 with higher scores indicating worse upper-extremity function.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Static-progressive SplintDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire26 units on a scale
Dynamic SplintDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire28 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026