Skip to content

Effectiveness of Continence Promotion Interventions Among Community-dwelling Older Women

Self-management, Constructivism or Both as Knowledge Transfer Strategies for Reducing the Cost and Impact of Urinary Incontinence Among Community-dwelling Senior Women in the United Kingdom

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01239836
Enrollment
259
Registered
2010-11-11
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

urinary incontinence, self-management, cost, self-efficacy, continence promotion

Brief summary

Urinary incontinence is a common and bothersome condition that remains frequently untreated among senior women. The aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two community-based continence promotion interventions aimed at improving rates of self-care and/or professional health-care seeking in older women with urinary incontinence. The main hypothesis posits that participation in a constructivist interactive workshop combined with use of an evidence-based self-management tool will yield rates of improvement in incontinence frequency and reduce the cost of pad use by 20% compared to either intervention alone, which individually are expected to yield minimal effect sizes of at least 0.3 compared to a sham intervention.

Detailed description

The research design is a 2x2 factorial open-label cluster randomised controlled trial. The cluster (unit of randomization) is at the level of each local community senior's group, from whence participants will be recruited. Incontinent community-dwelling older women aged 60 years and older who have not sought care for their urinary symptoms in the last two years, but who experience incontinence at least twice weekly will be recruited through local community organizations. Eligible participants from each local community centre will be randomly assigned as a group to one of four interventions. The first intervention is participation in an interactive constructivist continence workshop. The second intervention involves receipt of an evidence-based self-management tool for incontinence. The third group will receive both interventions. The fourth group will act as the control group: they will simply be asked about their urinary symptoms and given a general talk on women's health. At the end of the study, the control group will be offered the self-management tool.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALConstructivist interactive workshop on urinary incontinence

A one hour interactive group workshop aimed at contradicting commonly held beliefs and maladaptive practices about incontinence. The interactive continence workshop was designed to create cognitive dissonance and challenge these beliefs and practices, as well as to promote more effective therapeutic strategies for correcting urine leakage.

BEHAVIORALEvidence-based self-management tool

Participants will receive a customized evidence-based risk factor modification self-management tool targeting up to 6 risk factors and associated therapeutic strategies. The six risk factors are pelvic floor muscle weakness, consumption of caffeinated drinks, obesity, constipation, vision loss and smoking.

BEHAVIORALGeneral health lecture

Participants will attend a lecture on general women's health issues that does not address urinary incontinence.

Sponsors

Brunel University
CollaboratorOTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * 60 years or older * Urinary incontinence twice weekly * Women who have not sought medical advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 2 years. * Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

* Women who have received treatment for their urinary incontinence within the past two years from a health care provider with expertise in urinary incontinence management (i.e. nurse practitioners/physicians/surgeons who have a clinical practice that focuses on treating urinary incontinence). * Women started on medications for urinary incontinence (i.e. antimuscarinic medication) within the 6 months prior to enrolment. * Women with a history of a neurological condition (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis and spinal cord injury) because they require further investigation. Women identified to have these historical findings will be advised to speak to their physician immediately about their incontinence and the possible need for investigation. * Women who do not consent to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incontinence frequency3 monthsReductions in incontinence frequency as indicated on a 72-hour voiding diary at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of pad use3 monthsReductions in the cost of pad use per day at 3-months post intervention compared to baseline.
Self-efficacy for managing incontinence3-monthsAn increase of 5 points or more on the Geriatric Self-Efficacy index for urinary incontinence at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026