Skip to content

Physiotulle vs Urgotul in the Treatment of Leg Ulcer

Clinical Assessment of Physiotulle Dressing Compared to Urgotul Dressing in the Treatment of Leg Ulcer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01238419
Enrollment
188
Registered
2010-11-10
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2011-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leg Ulcers

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the pain at removal of Physiotulle dressing in comparison with that of Urgotul dressing in patients presenting a venous (or predominantly) venous leg ulcer.

Interventions

DEVICEPhysiotulle

Physiotulle is a non adherent dressing, composed of a polyester fabric impregnated with hydrocolloid particles (CMC) suspended in vaseline

DEVICEURGOTUL

Urgotul is an non occlusive dressing comprising of a polyester mesh impregnated with hydrocolloid particles dispersed on a petroleum jelly matrix

Sponsors

Coloplast A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient of either sex over 18 who have not been declared legally incompetent and who having given his written informed consent * Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer (ankle-brachial index \> 0.8) * Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer in granulation phase (granulation tissue \> 70 %) * Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer with low exsudate * Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer with a wound surface between 4 cm² and 170 cm² * Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer that has been treated with an appropriate compression in the two weeks prior to inclusion * Patient available to be monitored for at least 4 weeks * Patient able to answer questionnaires and particularly to evaluate his pain

Exclusion criteria

* Patient whose leg ulcer is locally infected (At least 3 of 5 clinical signs suggestive of infection \*)\* 5 signs suggestive of infection: pain, exsudate, smell, oedema, erythema * Patient requiring an analgesic treatment for the care (before dressing removal) * Patient whose ulcer belongs to angiodermatitis type or demonstrates a vasculitis * Patient with arterial ulcer * Patient with purely traumatic, infectious or neoplastic origin ulcer * Patient with a diabetic neuropathy of lower limbs * Patient with a known allergy to one of Physiotulle or Urgotul components * Patient already participating in another clinical study * Pregnant or breastfeeding patient Patient who have been taking corticoids \> 10mg / day or cytostatics by systematic way for the three months prior to inclusion Patient who have undergone surgery of saphenous trunk in the two months prior to inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain at dressing removal4 weekspain at dressing removal assessed by the patient immediately after dressing removal on a VAS scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relative reduction of the area of the leg ulcer measured by planimetry at final point at week 4 compared to the area at inclusion4weeks
Number of patients with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability4 weeks

Countries

Denmark, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026