Skip to content

Diet in Altering Disease Progression in Patients With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance

The Men's Eating and Living (MEAL) Study: A Randomized Trial of Diet to Alter Disease Progression in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01238172
Enrollment
478
Registered
2010-11-10
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2019-01-15
Last updated
2023-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

stage I prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Eating a diet high in vegetables may slow down disease progression in patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well diet works in altering disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Detailed description

CALGB 70807 is a randomized, phase III clinical trial designed to test this practical, diet-based intervention for prostate cancer in a broader clinical setting. Patients on AS will be randomized either to an intervention of centralized, telephone-based dietary counseling and structured dietary education or to a comparison control condition in which they receive the Prostate Cancer Foundation booklet. Study endpoints will include disease progression, incidence of treatment, and health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine if a telephone-based dietary intervention compared to no intervention will decrease clinical progression in AS patients. Secondary * To compare the incidence of active treatment (surgery, irradiation, local ablation, or androgen deprivation) in AS patients receiving dietary intervention compared to no intervention. * To compare prostate cancer-related anxiety in AS patients receiving dietary intervention compared to no intervention. * To compare health-related quality of life in AS patients receiving dietary intervention compared to no intervention. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (≤ 70 years vs \> 70 years), race (black or african american vs other), and baseline prostate biopsy (0-12 months before registration vs \> 12-24 months before registration). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Please see the arms section for more information.

Interventions

OTHERdietary education and counseling
OTHERprostate cancer foundation booklet

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preregistration Eligibility: 1. Histologic Documentation: * The initial biopsy showing diagnosis of prostate cancer should be used for the purposes of determining eligibility. * However, if a subsequent biopsy performed before patient enrollment shows that the patient is ineligible, he may not be enrolled to the study. * Eligible patients must meet all of the following criteria: * Biopsy-proven (consisting of ≥ 10 tissue cores) adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed within 24 months prior to pre-registration * \< 25% of biopsy tissue cores positive for cancer * ≤ 50% of any one biopsy tissue core positive for cancer * Clinical stage ≤ T2a * Patients who have prostate cancer with distant metastases are not eligible * NOTE: If a patient undergoes a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and prostate cancer is diagnosed incidentally from the TURP specimen, eligibility for CALGB 70807 cannot be determined from the TURP specimen. However, if the patient subsequently undergoes a minimum 10-core prostate biopsy within 2 years of prostate cancer diagnosis from the TURP, and prostate cancer is detected in the biopsy specimen and meets the requirements above, the patient is eligible for this study. If prostate cancer is not detected in the biopsy specimen, the patient is not eligible. 2. Prior Treatment: Patients who have had prior treatment for prostate cancer by surgery, irradiation, local ablative (i.e. cryosurgery or high-intensity focused ultrasound) or androgen deprivation therapy are not eligible. 3. Patients who have had a history of non-cutaneous malignancy (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) in the previous 5 years are not eligible. 4. Language: Patients must be able to read and comprehend English language text and be able to understand spoken English over the phone. 5. Life expectancy of at least 3 years 6. Patients who are currently taking vitamin supplements including lycopene and beta-carotene are eligible. 7. Patients receiving treatment with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride, dutasteride) within 90 days prior to preregistration are not eligible. Treatment with these agents during the protocol intervention is not permitted. 8. Patients who are currently taking coumadin are not eligible. 9. Participants will be men aged 50 to 80 years. 10. For men ≤ 70 years, biopsy Gleason score ≤ 6; for men \> 70 years, biopsy Gleason score ≤ (3 + 4) = 7. 11. Required Initial Laboratory Values: * Serum PSA \< 10 ng/mL * NOTE: Baseline PSA for determination of eligibility must be measured after discontinuation of any 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Registration Eligibility: 1. Successful completion of three 24-hour dietary recalls during the run-in period. 2. Patients consuming ≥ 6 servings per day of fruits and vegetables (not including juices), as determined by the run-in dietary recalls are not eligible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ProgressionUp to 2 yearsTime to progression (TTP) was defined as the length of time from the date of random assignment to progression; patients who died from any cause without experiencing disease progression were censored at the time of death. Disease progression is defined by (a) PSA doubling time (PSADT) less than 3 years, (b) PSA above 10 at any time, or (c) Gleason score on repeat biopsy ≥ 7 for men 70 years or younger and ≥ 4+3 = 7 for men older than 70 years. For the primary analysis, TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to determine superiority of the intervention arm (Arm A: MEAL Program Intervention) compared with the control arm (Arm B: Prostate Cancer Foundation Booklet).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Treatment: Censoring Death, Progression or Last Follow-up as Measured by Number of Events ObservedUp to 2 yearsTime to treatment was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. For this analysis, patients who did not withdrawal from the study to pursue treatment were censored at the time of clinical progression, death, or their last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first. The number of patients who observed an event (treatment) are summarized below.
Quality of Life (QOL) Was Measured Using Change From Baseline in Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) at Month 24Up to 2 yearsQuality of Life (QOL) was measured using Observed Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer \[MAX-PC\] at Month 24 on a 0-108 scale, with lower scores corresponding to worse overall QOL and higher scores corresponding to better overall QOL. MAX-PC is a prostate cancer-specific measure to assess patient anxiety due to prostate cancer, PSA tests and fears of recurrence. Change from baseline to month-24 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at month-24. Higher scores on MAX-PC indicate better QOL
Total Vegetables (Servings Per Day) Evaluated at Baseline and Month 24 Based on Dietary RecallUp to 2 yearsAt baseline and 24 months, participant diet including total vegetables (servings/day) was measured with a series of three separate interviews at each time point, on three-randomly selected days in a single week, using the Nutrition Data Systems for Research (NDS-R, current version 2010, University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) software and nutrient database. Total vegetables were measured as the number of servings per day (range: ≥ 0), where higher values correspond to more servings per day. The within-participant change from baseline at 24 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline number of servings per day from the number of servings per day at month 24; positive values correspond to increased consumption of total vegetables.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 602 total patients were pre-registered, only 478 patients were deemed eligible and randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A - MEAL Program Intervention
Patients will receive dietary education and telephone counseling sessions over 24 months.
226
Arm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation Booklet
Patients receive education material about diet, nutrition, exercise and cancer.
217
Total443

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIneligible: based on Central Path Review919
Overall StudyIneligible: based on Eligibility Review25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A - MEAL Program InterventionArm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation BookletTotal
Age, Continuous63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.7 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
28.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
28.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
24 Participants26 Participants50 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
186 Participants171 Participants357 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
226 Participants217 Participants443 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
226 Participants217 Participants443 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the length of time from the date of random assignment to progression; patients who died from any cause without experiencing disease progression were censored at the time of death. Disease progression is defined by (a) PSA doubling time (PSADT) less than 3 years, (b) PSA above 10 at any time, or (c) Gleason score on repeat biopsy ≥ 7 for men 70 years or younger and ≥ 4+3 = 7 for men older than 70 years. For the primary analysis, TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to determine superiority of the intervention arm (Arm A: MEAL Program Intervention) compared with the control arm (Arm B: Prostate Cancer Foundation Booklet).

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: The primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat (m-ITT) analysis population. The m-ITT population included all randomized patients; however, patients who later became ineligible by eligibility review or centralized pathology review of their baseline tissue specimens were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A - MEAL Program InterventionTime to Progression683.0 days
Arm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation BookletTime to Progression549.0 days
p-value: 0.7695% CI: [0.75, 1.24]Log Rank
Secondary

Quality of Life (QOL) Was Measured Using Change From Baseline in Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) at Month 24

Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using Observed Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer \[MAX-PC\] at Month 24 on a 0-108 scale, with lower scores corresponding to worse overall QOL and higher scores corresponding to better overall QOL. MAX-PC is a prostate cancer-specific measure to assess patient anxiety due to prostate cancer, PSA tests and fears of recurrence. Change from baseline to month-24 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at month-24. Higher scores on MAX-PC indicate better QOL

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: modified ITT population: Only participants with available data on the individual study measure at baseline and 24 months were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A - MEAL Program InterventionQuality of Life (QOL) Was Measured Using Change From Baseline in Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) at Month 242.0 score on a scale
Arm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation BookletQuality of Life (QOL) Was Measured Using Change From Baseline in Total Summary Score of Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) at Month 242.8 score on a scale
p-value: 0.995Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Time to Treatment: Censoring Death, Progression or Last Follow-up as Measured by Number of Events Observed

Time to treatment was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. For this analysis, patients who did not withdrawal from the study to pursue treatment were censored at the time of clinical progression, death, or their last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first. The number of patients who observed an event (treatment) are summarized below.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: The m-ITT population included all randomized patients; however, patients who later became ineligible by eligibility review or centralized pathology review of their baseline tissue specimens were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A - MEAL Program InterventionTime to Treatment: Censoring Death, Progression or Last Follow-up as Measured by Number of Events Observed3 Participants
Arm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation BookletTime to Treatment: Censoring Death, Progression or Last Follow-up as Measured by Number of Events Observed2 Participants
p-value: 0.7195% CI: [0.23, 8.41]Log Rank
Secondary

Total Vegetables (Servings Per Day) Evaluated at Baseline and Month 24 Based on Dietary Recall

At baseline and 24 months, participant diet including total vegetables (servings/day) was measured with a series of three separate interviews at each time point, on three-randomly selected days in a single week, using the Nutrition Data Systems for Research (NDS-R, current version 2010, University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) software and nutrient database. Total vegetables were measured as the number of servings per day (range: ≥ 0), where higher values correspond to more servings per day. The within-participant change from baseline at 24 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline number of servings per day from the number of servings per day at month 24; positive values correspond to increased consumption of total vegetables.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: Participants with available data on the individual study measure at baseline and 24 months were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm A - MEAL Program InterventionTotal Vegetables (Servings Per Day) Evaluated at Baseline and Month 24 Based on Dietary Recall2.01 servings per day
Arm B - Prostate Cancer Foundation BookletTotal Vegetables (Servings Per Day) Evaluated at Baseline and Month 24 Based on Dietary Recall0.37 servings per day
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026