Skip to content

Weaning And Variability Evaluation

Weaning And Variability Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01237886
Acronym
WAVE
Enrollment
660
Registered
2010-11-10
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2017-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extubation, Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Keywords

spontaneous breathing trial, heart rate variability, respiratory rate variability

Brief summary

Knowing when to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation (i.e. removal of breathing or endotracheal tube or extubation) is critically important, as both prolonged ventilation and failed extubation are both associated with harm and risk of death. Our objective is to improve the safety of extubation by harnessing hidden information contained in the patterns of variation of heart and respiratory rate measured over intervals-in-time. Currently, to assess a patient's ability to be extubated, a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is routinely performed, where the level of ventilator support is reduced, and their response is observed in order to help predict if they will tolerate extubation (i.e. complete removal of ventilator support). Given that health is associated with a high degree of variation of physiologic parameters (e.g. heart and respiratory rate), and illness & stress are associated with a loss of variability, the investigators aim to uncover the loss of variation as a measure of stress during SBT's. The investigators hypothesize that maintaining stable heart rate and respiratory rate variability (HRV and RRV) throughout the SBT will predict subsequent successful extubation, and conversely, a reduction in either HRV or RRV manifest during a SBT predicts extubation failure. A pilot study has demonstrated feasibility, and compelling preliminary results. A website, centralized data storage and analysis, and a trans-disciplinary team of scientists are in place to definitively test this novel technology. Determination of when to extubate critically ill patients remains a high-stakes clinical challenge; and improved prediction of extubation failure has potential to save lives and reduce costs in critically ill patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Invasive mechanical ventilation for \>48 hours, * patient is ready for SBTs for assessment for extubation, * has a normal sinus rhythm at time of SBT (no pacemaker), * is tolerating pressure support ventilation ≤14 cm H2O (SpO2 ≥ 90% with FiO2 ≤ 40% and PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O), * hemodynamically stable (low or no vasopressors), stable neurological status (no deterioration in GCS during prior 24 hours & ICP \< 20), * intact airway reflexes (cough & gag).

Exclusion criteria

* Order not to re-intubate, * anticipated withdrawal of life support, * known or suspected severe weakness (myopathy, neuropathy or quadriplegia), * tracheostomy, * and prior extubation during ICU stay.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Continuous heart rate (electrocardiogram) & respiratory rate (CO2 capnography) waveformsat time of spontaneous breathing trial (at least 48 hours after intubation and within 24 hours of extubation)

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026