Skip to content

Ultrasonic Wound Debridement vs. Standard Sharp Debridement

Ultrasonic Surgical Wound Debridement vs. Standard Sharp Debridement In the Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Single Center, Randomized, Parallel, Clinical Outcome Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01237392
Enrollment
75
Registered
2010-11-09
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2014-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Skin Ulcers

Keywords

wound debridement, requiring debridement

Brief summary

A single center, randomized, parallel, clinical outcome trial to compare the rate of healing in chronic wounds debrided with either high energy ultrasonic debridement (with cavitation) or standard of care sharp debridement.

Interventions

DEVICEContact ultrasonic debridement device

Cavitational ultrasound wound debridement device

Sponsors

Calvary Hospital, Bronx, NY
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic wound needing debridement \>3 cm2 * Ulcer history \>4mo * Adequate arterial blood flow (ABI\>0.7) * Venous, Inflammatory, Pressure, Diabetic

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding disorder * ABI\<0.7 * Uncontrolled diabetes * Taking systemic corticosteroids * Chemotherapy * Participating in another study * Treatment with Apligraft, Dermagraft, or Regranex within 90 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to complete wound closure12 and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relative rate of wound healing8, 12 and 24 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026