Skip to content

Initial Stability of Posterior Maxillary Implants With Bicortical Fixation

Comparison of Initial Implant Stability of Posterior Maxillary Implants With Bicortical Fixation to Implants Engaging Only the Alveolar Crest

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01237184
Enrollment
45
Registered
2010-11-09
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2018-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Keywords

initial dental implant stability, maxillary sinus proximity, bicortical fixation

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to 1. determine whether dental implant engaging both the alveolar crest cortical bone and sinus floor using vertical stopper drill and self-threading concept (bi-cortical fixation) increases initial implant stability compared to the short implants engaging only alveolar crest cortical bone (uni-cortical fixation) and/or ones engaging both crest and sinus floor but with green stick fracture (indirect sinus lift technique), 2. study whether different surgical techniques, residual bone height, bone density, and length and width of the implants used affect initial implant stability in posterior maxilla. In addition, this study will continue to 3. compare secondary implant stability of implants fixed bi-cortically, uni-cortically and with indirect sinus lift technique at 2nd stage surgery/6 month healing and 1 year follow-up from the restoration and 4. measure amount of endo-sinus bone formation from the 1- year follow up CT (computer tomogram) scan and evaluate safety and potential post-operative complications of bi-cortical fixation and indirect sinus lift technique reported throughout the follow up periods.

Detailed description

The clinical trial will evaluate initial implant stability as a primary outcome measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) employing dental implants surgically placed in posterior maxillary bone by engaging alveolar crest and the sinus floor using vertical stopper drill and self-threading concept (bi-cortical fixation), engaging only the alveolar crest (uni-cortical fixation), and engaging alveolar crest and the sinus floor using indirect sinus lift technique (indirect sinus lift technique). The surgical procedures compared in this experiment include 3 groups: * Group 1 (15 implants) Short implants placed in proximity of the sinus without sinus floor involvement (unicortical fixation) * Group 2 (15 implants) Implants placed using indirect sinus lift technique (indirect sinus lift technique) * Group 3 (15 implants) Bi-cortically fixed implants intentionally engaging sinus floor beyond up to 1-2mm without graft but using stopper drill and self-threading concept (bi-cortical fixation)

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible volunteers must be at least 18 years old, partially edentulous in maxillary posterior region with 7-11 mm residual bone height under the sinus floor and be indicated for CBCT scan for diagnosis and treatment planning, and of a medical risk of ASA I or II classification to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bone pathology, sinus infection, and who are pregnant will be excluded. Implants requiring tapping, site of an implant replacement, and implant with dehiscence and/or fenestration will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
initial implant stabilitymeasued immediately after each dental implant is placed in patient's mouth.The investigators expect the recruitments and implant placement surgeries for 45 implants will take a year so initial implant stability of each one of 45 implants will be measured over the 1 year period.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026