Skip to content

Hematological Infection Score Compared to the Hospital Standard for Diagnosis of SIRS or Sepsis on ICU

Hematological Infection Profile (ICIS/ICPS) Compared to Actual Best Hospital Practice for Differentiation of SIRS and Sepsis and Management of Antiinfective Therapy in ICU Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01236703
Enrollment
207
Registered
2010-11-09
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2012-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, SIRS

Keywords

SIRS, Sepsis, hematological infection score

Brief summary

CRP and PCT are not valid parameters of early infection in particularly postoperative patients. (Sanders et al., A&A, June 2006, Vol.102; Katja et al., Shock, February 2001, Vol 15.2) Better detection systems for SIRS and sepsis are urgently required. ICIS® (Sysmex intensive care infection score) and ICPS® (Sysmex intensive care prognostic score) are two new score-systems depending on detectable cellular response of the innate immune system in human peripheral blood. The purpose of this observational study is to determine if these scores are superior in early differentiation between non-infectious SIRS and infectious SIRS (sepsis) in postoperative patients. Furthermore, the applicability of the scores for triggering start and ending of anti-infective therapy will be examined.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sysmex Europe GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all ICU patients age \> 18 years * more than 36h on ICU

Exclusion criteria

* ICU patients age \< 18 years * less than 36h on ICU

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary objective of this study performed according to an observational post-ad-hoc design is to show that the two Sysmex infection scores provide a better performance than CRP & PCT for infection processes thus providing an efficient alternative.a period of 60 daysApproximately 200 patients will be enrolled in the study. They are followed up until the end of ICU stay or, for a maximum of 60 days. Usually in clinical routine, patients suspected to have an infection process, receive once per day a full infectiology profile. It consists of CRP, PCT and the Sysmex infection profiles (ICIS/ICPS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The second objective is to investigate whether ICIS® and ICPS® could assist in faster antiinfective regim decisions than CRP & PCT.a period of 60 dayApproximately 200 patients will be enrolled in the study. They are followed up until the end of ICU stay or, for a maximum of 60 days. Usually in clinical routine, patients suspected to have an infection process, receive once per day a full infectiology profile. It consists of CRP, PCT and the Sysmex infection profiles (ICIS/ICPS).

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026