Skip to content

CryoValve® SG Aortic Human Heart Valve Combination Study

CryoValve® SG Aortic Human Heart Valve Combination Retrospective/Prospective, Multi-Center, Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01236469
Acronym
SGAV
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-11-08
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2015-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

Aortic Valve

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the probable benefit of CryoValve SG Aortic Human Heart Valve used in pediatric patients as an aortic valve replacement.

Detailed description

The CryoValve SG aortic human heart valve is recovered from deceased human donors, treated with the SynerGraft® (SG) process,which is designed to reduce the donor cells present on the graft. The valve is then cryopreserved for storage until use. Removing cells from the heart valve has been shown to reduce a component of the immune response after implant compared to a standard allograft valve. However, it is not known how this affects the long-term durability of the valve.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEchocardiogram

A prospective follow-up Study Echocardiogram will be performed, as applicable, for those subjects who do not have echo data as of January 1, 2009.

Sponsors

CryoLife, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 27 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as an aortic valve replacement. * Patients who were ≤ 21 years of age at the time of implant.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom the CryoValve SGAV was used as a patch or a non-valved conduit. * Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as a pulmonary valve replacement. * Patients that were ≥ 22 years of age at the time of implant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemodynamic PerformanceFrom Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)Peak Aortic Gradient (or Peak Velocity), Mean Aortic Gradient, Aortic Insufficiency, Effective Orifice Area
Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of SafetyFrom Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)Safety parameters will follow the guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations as established by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Evaluation of the following adverse events: * Mortality (all cause and valve-related) * Reoperation/reintervention * Explant * Endocarditis (all and valvular) * Thrombosis * Thromboembolism * Non-structural dysfunction * Perivalvular leak (all and major) * Bleeding (all and major) * Hemolysis * Calcification * Conduit failure

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026