Skip to content

Conventional Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

A Randomized, Prospective, Parallel Group Study of Conventional Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy (LDN) Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy (LESS-DN) in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01236326
Enrollment
105
Registered
2010-11-08
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2019-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplantation, Living Donors, Nephrectomy, Surgery, Laparoscopic

Brief summary

Laparoscopic nephrectomy (removal of the kidney) is the most common procedure for people donating a kidney to be used for living donor kidney transplantation. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) was a great advance in the field of living donor kidney transplantation due to the many advantages it offers over open nephrectomy, including significantly shorter hospitalization and recovery time, and significantly improved cosmetic result related to the nephrectomy scar(s). More recently, a new procedure has been introduced to the field of laparoscopic nephrectomy, called laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN). In the LESS-DN procedure, a single natural orifice (the umbilicus or belly button) is used as the single incision site through which the entire donor nephrectomy is performed. The LESS-DN procedure may further decrease donor morbidity by further decreasing length of stay, lessening recovery time, and improving satisfaction with the surgical scar. The investigators propose to evaluate conventional LDN versus a LESS-DN in a randomized, controlled trial in living kidney donors. The investigators will compare operative times and intra-operative donor management, intra- and post-operative complications, pain scores, analgesic requirements, length of stay, recovery parameters, surgical scar satisfaction, and function and survival of the transplanted kidney for the two groups of subjects: (1) the group that has the conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; and, (2) the group that has the laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy

PROCEDUREConventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Sponsors

Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary End Point of the Study Was the Mean/Median Number of Days Postsurgery Required for Each Group to Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.1 yearThe Primary Endpoint of the Study Will be Patient Self-reported Return to 100%, as Measured by the Number of Days Post-surgery That the Patient Reports His or Her Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Days on Oral Pain Medication After Discharge2 months
Days Before Going Back to Work2 months
Days to Normal Day-to-day Activities2 months
Recovered by 2 Months After Donation2 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LESS-DN
Laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy: Patients randomized to this arm will undergo laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy
49
Conventional LDN
Conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Patients randomized to this arm will undergo conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
51
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalConventional LDNLESS-DN
Age, Continuous47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI < 30 kg/m^2
72 participants36 participants36 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI >= 30 kg/m^2
28 participants15 participants13 participants
Multiple Arteries
No
88 participants45 participants43 participants
Multiple Arteries
Yes
12 participants6 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
14 participants9 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
All Other
8 participants2 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
59 participants31 participants28 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
19 participants9 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants51 participants49 participants
Relationship to Recipient
Living Related
45 participants24 participants21 participants
Relationship to Recipient
Living Unrelated
55 participants27 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants29 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants22 Participants20 Participants
Side of Donation (left)
Left
93 participants48 participants45 participants
Side of Donation (left)
Right
7 participants3 participants4 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 497 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 490 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary End Point of the Study Was the Mean/Median Number of Days Postsurgery Required for Each Group to Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.

The Primary Endpoint of the Study Will be Patient Self-reported Return to 100%, as Measured by the Number of Days Post-surgery That the Patient Reports His or Her Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is lower than the number of baseline participants because overall, 25% of subjects did not return the 2-month questionnaire (26.5% of the LESS-DN group and 23.5% of the Conventional LDN group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LESS-DNThe Primary End Point of the Study Was the Mean/Median Number of Days Postsurgery Required for Each Group to Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.43 daysStandard Deviation 15
Conventional LDNThe Primary End Point of the Study Was the Mean/Median Number of Days Postsurgery Required for Each Group to Return to 100% Functioning Capacity.45 daysStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Days Before Going Back to Work

Time frame: 2 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is lower than the number of baseline participants because overall, 25% of subjects did not return the 2-month questionnaire (26.5% of the LESS-DN group and 23.5% of the Conventional LDN group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LESS-DNDays Before Going Back to Work24 daysStandard Deviation 14
Conventional LDNDays Before Going Back to Work27 daysStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

Days on Oral Pain Medication After Discharge

Time frame: 2 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is lower than the number of baseline participants because overall, 25% of subjects did not return the 2-month questionnaire (26.5% of the LESS-DN group and 23.5% of the Conventional LDN group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LESS-DNDays on Oral Pain Medication After Discharge6 daysStandard Deviation 4
Conventional LDNDays on Oral Pain Medication After Discharge7 daysStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Days to Normal Day-to-day Activities

Time frame: 2 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is lower than the number of baseline participants because overall, 25% of subjects did not return the 2-month questionnaire (26.5% of the LESS-DN group and 23.5% of the Conventional LDN group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LESS-DNDays to Normal Day-to-day Activities30 daysStandard Deviation 17
Conventional LDNDays to Normal Day-to-day Activities33 daysStandard Deviation 25
Secondary

Recovered by 2 Months After Donation

Time frame: 2 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is lower than the number of baseline participants because overall, 25% of subjects did not return the 2-month questionnaire (26.5% of the LESS-DN group and 23.5% of the Conventional LDN group).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LESS-DNRecovered by 2 Months After Donation35 participants
Conventional LDNRecovered by 2 Months After Donation31 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026