Skip to content

Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in Health Care Workers

A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Raltegravir + Truvada Versus Kaletra + Truvada, for Post-exposure Prophylaxis in Health Care Workers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01234116
Acronym
PEP
Enrollment
16
Registered
2010-11-04
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2025-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Keywords

Post exposure prophylaxis, Health Care Workers

Brief summary

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) with a regimen of Truvada + Kaletra among health care workers (HCWs) at Henry Ford Hospital. Hypothesis: Raltegravir is safe and better tolerated compared with Kaletra, each in combination with Truvada, as assessed by review of completion rates of PEP and also review of completed safety data.

Detailed description

Health Care Workers that have occupational exposure to blood are at risk for HIV infection. Prevention of blood exposure, through safer practices, barrier precautions, safer needle devices, and other innovations, is the best way to prevent infection with HIV and other bloodborne pathogens. Though these strategies have been successful in reducing the frequency of blood exposure and needlestick injuries in the past decade, the hazard has not been eliminated. As of December 2001, the CDC had received voluntary reports of 57 documented cases of HIV seroconversion temporally associated with occupational exposure to HIV among U.S. health care personnel. An additional 138 infections among health care personnel were considered possible cases of occupational transmission. Because there is no cure or effective vaccine for HIV, optimal post exposure care, including the administration of antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV infection, remains a high priority in protecting health care workers.

Interventions

DRUGemtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Each health care worker will receive one of the Treatment Arms for 28 days.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (at least 18 years of age)employees of HFH * History of occupational exposure to bodily fluids * Negative HIV test * The ability to understand a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of any study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Positive pregnancy test * Females who are breastfeeding * History of renal disease * Contraindication for treating patient with components of PEP regimen * Greater than one dose of PEP medication for this exposure event

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evidence of Toxicity. Toxicity Was Measured as Any Adverse Event; Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea. Elevated Liver Function Tests.Variables to be measured within 4 weeks between groups.Descriptive study describing toxicity between the 2 groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Were HIV InfectedHIV ELISA measured within 24 weeks between groupsAny patient that gets HIV infected inspite of receiving PEP will be described

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Kaletra
Arm 1: Kaletra two tabs twice a day + Truvada one pill once a day. emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: Each health care worker will receive one of the Treatment Arms for 28 days.
8
Raltegravir
Arm 2: Raltegravir 400 mg, one pill twice a day + Truvada one pill once a day. emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: Each health care worker will receive one of the Treatment Arms for 28 days.
8
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicKaletraTotalRaltegravir
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants16 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 44 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Evidence of Toxicity. Toxicity Was Measured as Any Adverse Event; Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea. Elevated Liver Function Tests.

Descriptive study describing toxicity between the 2 groups

Time frame: Variables to be measured within 4 weeks between groups.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
KaletraEvidence of Toxicity. Toxicity Was Measured as Any Adverse Event; Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea. Elevated Liver Function Tests.4 adverse events
RaltegravirEvidence of Toxicity. Toxicity Was Measured as Any Adverse Event; Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea. Elevated Liver Function Tests.4 adverse events
Secondary

Number of Participants That Were HIV Infected

Any patient that gets HIV infected inspite of receiving PEP will be described

Time frame: HIV ELISA measured within 24 weeks between groups

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
KaletraNumber of Participants That Were HIV Infected0 participants
RaltegravirNumber of Participants That Were HIV Infected0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026