Skip to content

Computed Tomography Scan Versus Color Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. A Prospective Multicenter Study

Computed Tomography Scan Versus Color Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. A Prospective Multicenter Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01230203
Acronym
ESSEA
Enrollment
659
Registered
2010-10-29
Start date
2010-12-16
Completion date
2015-06-12
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Brief summary

Cumulative radiation dose, cost, contrast induced nephrotoxicity and increased demand for computed tomography aortography (CTA) suggest that duplex ultrasonoraphy (DU) may be an alternative to CTA-based surveillance. The investigators compared CTA with DU during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) follow-up. Patients undergoing EVAR have radiological follow-up data entered in a prospectively multicenter database. The gold standard test for endoleak detection was CTA. DU interpretation was performed independently of CTA and vice versa.

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputed tomography scan versus color duplex ultrasound

Computed tomography scan versus color duplex ultrasound

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who were followed after EVAR, whatever the trademark and the model of the stentgraft (bi-iliac or mono-iliac) * Age \> 18 years old * Patient with social insurance * Signature of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patients who underwent EVAR with a fenestrated or branched stentgraft * Obese patients (BMI \> 30) * Patients with severe renal insufficiency (Creatinine Clearance \< 30 ml/mn) * Patients who can't practice both an CT scan with iode injection and duplex ultrasound test over a period of one month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically significant abnormalities that require secondary intervention (coil embolization, endovascular intervention, surgical conversion)Between 1 week and 1 monthClinically significant abnormalities that require secondary intervention (coil embolization, endovascular intervention, surgical conversion) : * increasing aneurysm sac size (≥5mm), * type I or type III endoleak, * type II endoleak with an increasing aneurysm sac size (≥2mm) * significant stenosis of a limb of the stentgraft (≥70%).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All abnormalities, clinically significant or noBetween 1 week and 1 monthAll abnormalities, clinically significant or no: All types of endoleak An increasing aneurysm sac size (≥1mm) Stenosis or thrombosis of limb of the stentgraft

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHassen-Khofja Reda

CHU de Nice - Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026