Skip to content

Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% in Subjects for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01230125
Enrollment
311
Registered
2010-10-28
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Keywords

Inflammation, Pain, Ocular surgery

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% to vehicle for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.

Interventions

Instill study medication into study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days

DRUGVehicle

Instill study medication into the study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who are candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery * Participants who, in the Investigator's opinion, have potential postoperative pinhole Snellen visual acuity (VA) of at least 20/200 in the study eye. * Participants must be willing to wait to undergo cataract surgery on the fellow eye until after the study has been completed.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who are expected to require concurrent ocular therapy (either eye) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mast cell stabilizers, antihistamines, or decongestants. * Participants who are expected to require treatment with any systemic or ocular (either eye) corticosteroids or glucocorticoids. * Participants who are expected to require concurrent ocular therapy with immunosuppressants (eg, Restasis). * Participants who have known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the study drug(s) or their components. * Participants participating in any drug or device clinical investigation within 30 days prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.8 daysAnterior chamber (AC) cells were assessed using a 0 to 4 grading scale by an ophthalmologist using slip lamp biomicroscopy. A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens was performed without pupil dilation. Accumulation of white blood cells in aqueous was assessed. The grades were defined as: 0 = No cells seen; 1 = 1 - 5 cells; 2 = 6 - 15 cells; 3 = 16 - 30 cells; 4 = \>30 cells. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as Grade 0.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain8 daysOcular pain was defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. The scores ranged from 0=None to 5=Severe, were higher scores indicated worse pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.8 daysA slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens will be performed without pupil dilation. Scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). The grades for flare were 0=None to 4=Very Severe effect.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mapracorat
Ophthalmic suspension 3% Mapracorat: Instill study medication into study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days
207
Vehicle
Vehicle of mapracorat ophthalmic suspension Vehicle: Instill study medication into the study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days
104
Total311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMapracoratVehicleTotal
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75
69.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.35
Sex: Female, Male
Female
109 Participants58 Participants167 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
98 Participants46 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 20717 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 2070 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.

Anterior chamber (AC) cells were assessed using a 0 to 4 grading scale by an ophthalmologist using slip lamp biomicroscopy. A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens was performed without pupil dilation. Accumulation of white blood cells in aqueous was assessed. The grades were defined as: 0 = No cells seen; 1 = 1 - 5 cells; 2 = 6 - 15 cells; 3 = 16 - 30 cells; 4 = \>30 cells. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as Grade 0.

Time frame: 8 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MapracoratPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.32 Participants
VehiclePercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.12 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain

Ocular pain was defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. The scores ranged from 0=None to 5=Severe, were higher scores indicated worse pain.

Time frame: 8 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MapracoratPercentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain130 Participants
VehiclePercentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain57 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.

A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens will be performed without pupil dilation. Scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). The grades for flare were 0=None to 4=Very Severe effect.

Time frame: 8 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MapracoratPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.90 Participants
VehiclePercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.30 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026