Skip to content

Informing Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

Informing Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01230099
Enrollment
622
Registered
2010-10-28
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Critical Illness, Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

Critical Illness, Mechanical Ventilation, Palliative Care, Caregivers

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test a communication intervention to support family decision-making for patients with chronic critical illness.

Detailed description

Increasing use of intensive care therapies by an aging population has created a new medical syndrome - chronic critical illness - encompassing multi-system derangements, recurrent complications, and protracted/permanent dependence on mechanical ventilation and other life-supports. Numbering \>100,000 at any point in time, the chronically critically ill are a growing population of older adults and a serious national health problem. Annual expenditures for these patients are estimated at $24 billion, mostly for patients ≥ 65 years old. Yet 6-month mortality rates exceed those for most malignancies, impairments are severe among survivors, and return to the community is rare. Descriptive research has identified domains of information that are important for decision-making by patients/families about continuation of treatment in the chronic phase of critical illness, but has also revealed that decisions are often made without this information or patient goals of care as a context. In acute critical illness, scheduled, structured meetings and printed informational aids are effective for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) families, but no study has tested an intervention to inform and support decision-making about chronic critical illness. This study is a randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial of such an intervention. Specific Aims are: (1) To evaluate the impact on family- and patient-focused outcomes of a proactive program of protocolized, interdisciplinary, informational support meetings led by a palliative care physician, plus a printed informational aid, for families of chronically critically ill patients; and (2) To evaluate the impact of this intervention on utilization of critical care resources for the chronically critically ill. We hypothesize that as compared to usual care plus the printed aid, this intervention will effectively inform decision-making, improve family well-being, promote discussion of preferences for patient goals of care, and optimize critical care resource utilization, without increasing patient mortality.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSupportive Information Team Group

A minimum of two protocolized, interdisciplinary, informational support meetings led by palliative care clinicians will be arranged with family members or other patient surrogates who participate in decision-making for individual chronically critically ill patients.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of North Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mechanically ventilated ≥ 7 days * Mechanically ventilated without \> 96 hour interruption * Age ≥ 21 years * ICU MD does not expect patient will die within 72 hours * ICU MD does not expect patient will be liberated from the ventilator within 72 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous admission to study ICU this hospitalization Mechanically ventilated at outside hospital for \> 7 days before transfer * Chronic Neuromuscular (NM) Disease * Trauma * Burn * Previous palliative care consultation in this hospitalization * No family or other surrogate decision-maker * Family not available * Surrogate lacks English proficiency * Physician refused permission for research staff to approach the family

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleDay 90

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Events Scale-RevisedDay 90
Discussion of Preferences for Patients Goals of CareDay 18-20Subscale of Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research Toolkit
Quality of CommunicationDay 18-20Curtis Measure
Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) SurveyDay 90
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleDay 18-20
Limitation of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) TherapyAverage of 60 daysPercent of patients with mechanical ventilation, renal replacement, vasopressors, or artificial nutrition withheld or withdrawn
Hospital Length of StayAverage of 60 daysDays since randomization
MortalityDay 90
Physician-Surrogate Discordance Scoreday 18-20
Modified Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research (CHCR) ToolDay 90

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026