Skip to content

Assessment of Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine During Continuous Epidural Infusion

Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Study of Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine During Continuous Epidural Infusion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01229241
Acronym
LEVOROPI
Enrollment
181
Registered
2010-10-27
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2012-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Surgery

Keywords

local anesthetic, epidural, pharmacokinetics, plasmatic concentration, epidural continuous infusion

Brief summary

The aim of the study is the assessment of the systemic absorption of local anesthetics during continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain control.

Detailed description

In literature the systemic toxicity of bupivacaine is widely demonstrated, like the minor toxicity of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at the same anesthetic potency. The are actually no studies in humans confronting levobupivacaine and ropivacaine under the aspect of efficacy and toxicity.The aim of the study is the assessment of the systemic absorption of local anesthetics during continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain control. Primary outcome: Assessment of the plasmatic equimolar concentrations of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine during continuous epidural infusion Secondary outcome: Assessment of the safety level of the local anesthetic (major difference between haematic concentration of the local anesthetic and neuro-cardiotoxic dose). Difference of the analgesic efficacy between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. Differences in collateral effects due to the local anesthetic: hypotension and sensitive block. Prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial

Interventions

DRUGlocal anesthetic

postoperative 48h epidural continuous infusion, 1. ropivacaine 0,2% (250ml)+ sufentanil 0,75mcg/ml 2. levobupivacaine 0,125% (250ml)+ sufentanil 0,75mcg/ml

Sponsors

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I or ASA II * Scheduled for major surgery * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* ASA III, IV * Emergency surgery * Recovery in intensive care unit after surgery * habitual opioid consumption * cognitive or mental alterations * coagulopathy * piastrinemia \< 100.000/mm3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma concentration of the local anesthetics in studyduring 60h after surgeryAssessment of the equivalence of the systemic exposition of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine during 48h continuous epidural infusion with in a range of 15%.Blood samples (8) will be taken for farmacological assessment of local anesthetic plasma concentrations at time (hours) 0,+3h,+6h,+12h,+24h,+48h,+54h,+60h

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of the pharmacological profile of the local anesthetics in studyduring 60h after surgeryAssessment of the therapeutic index (plasma concentration of the local anesthetics in study compared to those described in literature to be related to toxic effects).
Difference between the to groups (at least 25%) in terms of pain control (1 episode of VAS>4)Pain control (VAS, VASm, rescue dose) during the 72 h postsurgery
Difference at least 20% in presentation of collateral effects between the two groupsContinuous assessment during the 72 h post-surgery

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026