Skip to content

Effects of an Active Implementation of a Guideline for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Effects of an Active Implementation of a Chronic Disease Management Programme for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01228708
Enrollment
3021
Registered
2010-10-26
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2012-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, Implementation of a Chronic Disease Management Programme

Keywords

Implementation strategy, Chronic disease management programme, COPD

Brief summary

Aims: To design a proactive implementation strategy for a chronic-disease-management-programme. To describe effects of the active implementation of a programme for COPD-patients measured on patient-related goals and use of health resources. To describe stakeholders' evaluation of the implementation. Materials and method: An intervention study with 3000 COPD-patients cluster-randomized after a bloc-randomization of their GP-practice. 18 GP-practices in Ringkøbing-Skjern-Municipality are randomized to receive an active implementation or to an as usual group. A neighboring municipality acts as sleeping control. With data from registers and a questionnaire-survey the effect on COPD-patients self reported-health, evaluation of health system and changes in distribution of health resources is analyzed. How health professionals perceive the implementation and how it influences their conception, interactions and culture is illustrated by interviews with stakeholders. We expect to see improved health related quality of life, enhanced evaluation of the health system and a more appropriate distribution of health resources in the intervention group.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Health systems will manage more and more people with chronic diseases as life-expectancy increases and treatment options improve. As the need for resources increases, it will be vital that a targeted strategy for health care to this growing group is developed so all are offered a professional and efficient treatment and that resources are used equitable. A proactive strategy will secure that not only acute needs of patients, but the need of the whole population is served. AIM: To describe the process of implementation and the effects of Central Denmark Region's chronic disease management programme for COPD-patients. METHOD: This is an intervention study, where approximately 3000 COPD-patients will be cluster-randomized after a bloc-randomization of their GP-practice. 15 GP-practices in Ringkøbing-Skjern Municipality will be randomized to receive the focused implementation or to an as usual group. Approximately 4000 COPD patients from a neighboring municipality with a similar profile will be a control group without any active implementation in any GP-practice and any contamination between GP-practices will therefore be eliminated. THE INTERVENTION: A proactive implementation strategy for the chronic disease management programme will be designed based on the literature and methods which have proven effective in implementing new ways of working when different stakeholders and cultures are involved. Core intervention elements: GP-practice visits and education with focus on registration of smoking status and offering of smoking cessation, stratification of COPD patients according to health level or disease status, written referral from GP to community initiatives and written feedback to GP, discharge notice to GP from hospital, home visit by GP or practice nurse together with community nurse to plan care with newly discharged frail patients, With data from registers and a questionnaire-survey the effect on COPD-patients self reported health, evaluation of the health system and changes in the distribution of health resources will be analyzed. How the health professionals in hospital, community-care and in GP-practices perceive the implementation and how it influences their conception, interactions and culture will be illustrated in an interview-survey of stakeholders.

Interventions

OTHERActive implementation of a guideline for chronic disease

Smoking cessation courses Remuneration to GPs for the planned follow-up and joint home visits Action card and sputum colour advice Webpage on How to live with COPD and the support the health system can provide Database with patients with COPD Feed-back from health centre to GPs, when patients have finished courses Fax from hospital to GPs, when patients with COPD is discharged Routines to recall patients for follow-ups Team audit, evaluate and adjust the strategies every 3rd month Joint home visit with GP and community nurse when a patient with COPD is discharged to plan future care Practice staff do part of follow-ups and monitoring Practice supervision with consultant in lung diseases Podcast with advice from specialists Guideline for COPD

Sponsors

Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ringkoebing-Skjern Municipality, Denmark.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Region MidtJylland Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* People who live in either Ringkoebing-Skjern or Ikast-Brande municipalities and have a GP in the municipality and have been in hospital during the last 5 years with a lung related diagnosis or has redeemed a prescription for medication for lung related problems twice during the last year or has had at least two spirometries done during the last year.

Exclusion criteria

* People who do not fit the above inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in COPD-patients self reported-health, their evaluation of the health system and in the distribution of health resources.14 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health professionals14 monthsHow health professionals perceive the implementation and how it influences their conception, interactions and culture.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026