Skip to content

Comparison of Slow Efficiency Daily Dialysis (SLEDD) With Unfractionated Heparin Versus Citrasate in Critically Ill Patients.

Comparison of Slow Efficiency Daily Dialysis (SLEDD) With Unfractionated Heparin Versus Citrasate in Critically Ill Patients.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01228292
Enrollment
250
Registered
2010-10-26
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2010-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Kidney Injury, Hemodialysis

Keywords

Anticoagulation, Intensive Care Medicine, Hemodialysis, Critical Ill Patients

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of hemodialysis with unfractionated heparin compared to hemodialysis with Citrasate in Critically Ill Patients.

Detailed description

Objective : To compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Sustained Low Efficiency Daily Hemodialysis (SLEDD) using regional anticoagulation with Citrasate® compared to systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients. Design : Prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial Setting : mixed medical-surgical 45 bed ICU in a tertiary university hospital Patients : 250 patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage III needing renal replacement therapy Interventions : Patients are randomized to receive SLEDD using standard dialysate and systemic anticoagulation with UF versus SLEDD using Citrasate®-dialysate with no additional UF. Measurements and main results : Primary end point : \- The incidence of premature interruptions of the dialysis procedure attributed to hemofilter clotting. Secondary end points : * The incidence of bleeding episodes as defined by the WHO-criteria * The transfusion requirements * The incidence of technique failure * The incidence of metabolic derangements (metabolic alkalosis, metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia) * The incidence of citrate intoxication * The dialysis efficiency expressed as Kt/V and URR Tertiary end points : \- All cause mortality at day 28 and day 90 after inclusion

Interventions

DRUGUnfractionated heparin

dose 5-10 IU/kg/hrs adaptations of infusion rate upon APTT measurements during hemodialysis

DRUGCitrasate

Citrasate is infused as a dialysate

Sponsors

University Hospital, Antwerp
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Need for hemodialysis in the ICU for at least one treatment * No prior hemodialysis treatment in the ICU except continuous renal replacement therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Need for systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated or fractionated heparin, oral anticoagulants or intravenous anti-aggregants for other reasons * Need for continued thrombolysis therapy within the 6 hours before inclusion * Need for continued treatment with activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa) within the 12 hours before inclusion * Need for continued treatment with intravenous anti-aggregants (abciximab, eptifabide) within 12 hours before inclusion * Liver failure (acute and acute-on-chronic) * Confirmed or suspected Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) * Heparin allergies * Severe uncorrected hypocalcemia (ionized calcium \< 0,8 mmol/l) * Refusal of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of premature interruptions of the dialysis procedure attributed to hemofilter clotting.6 hours after starting dialysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of technique failure defined as the number of patients who develop a contra-indication for the allocated anticoagulation regimen during the study periodduring whole wtudy
The incidence of bleeding episodes. A bleeding episode is defined according to the WHO bleeding criteriaduring the whole study period
The transfusion requirements defined as the total of units blood products administrated during the ICU stay and per dialysis treatmentduring the whole study period
The incidence of metabolic derangements during the study periodduring the whole study period* Metabolic alkalosis (defined as a pH \> 7,5 and a bicarbonate \> 24 mmol/l) * Metabolic acidosis (defined as a pH \< 7,25 and a bicarbonate \< 18 mmol/l) * Hypocalcemia (defined as an ionized calcium \< 0,9 mmol/l) * Hypercalcemia (defined as an ionized calcium \> 1,2 mol/l) * Hypernatremia (defined as a Na+ \> 145 mmol/l) * Hyponatremia (defined a a Na+ \< 130 mmol/l) * Citrate toxicity (defined as a total calcium/ionized calcium ratio \> 2,5)
Dialysis efficiency expressed as Kt/V and URR6 hours after starting dialysis

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactWalter Verbrugghe, MD
walter.verbrugghe@uza.be003238214149
Backup ContactPhilippe Jorens, PhD, MD
philippe.jorens@uza.be003238213639

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026