Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Monotherapy After First-line Chemotherapy in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer in Asian Women

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Monotherapy in Asian Women Who Have Not Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma - An Extension Study to VEG110655

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01227928
Enrollment
145
Registered
2010-10-25
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2015-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms, Ovarian

Keywords

tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma, primary peritoneal cancer, ovarian cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, gynecologic cancer, anti-angiogenesis, pazopanib

Brief summary

This is a study to determine whether therapy with pazopanib is effective and safe in Asian women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer whose cancer has not progressed on first-line chemotherapy.

Detailed description

This study is an extension study to the VEG110655 study. The parent study, VEG110655, was designed to evaluate whether pazopanib 800 mg daily for 52 weeks will prolong progression free survival (PFS) in women diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. These women will have obtained stable disease, a complete remission, or a partial remission after debulking surgery and at least five cycles of chemotherapy (taxane/platinum). This extension study will evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes of pazopanib monotherapy and placebo in an Asian population with the same indication as the parent study.

Interventions

DRUGPazopanib

Pazopanib 800 mg daily for 24 months

DRUGPlacebo comparator

Placebo 800 mg daily for 24 months

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written informed consent * At least 18 years old. * Histologically confirmed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma that was treated with surgical debulking and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy. * Study randomization at least 3 weeks and not more than 12 weeks from the date of the last chemotherapy dose, and all major toxicities from the previous chemotherapy must have resolved. * No evidence of disease progression * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of less than or equal to 2 * Able to swallow and retain oral medication. * Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal system function as follows: Hematologic * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at least 1.5 X 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin at least 9 g/dL (or 5.59 mmol/L) * Platelets at least 100 X 10\^9/L * Prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) up to 1.2 X ULN * Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) up to 1.2 X ULN Hepatic * Total bilirubin up to 1.5 X ULN * AST and ALT up to 2.5 X ULN Renal * Serum creatinine up to 1.5 mg/dL Or, if greater than 1.5 mg/dL: Calculated creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min Urine Protein * Urine protein is 0, trace, or +1 determined by dipstick urinalysis, or \< 1.0 gram determined by 24-hour urine protein analysis. * Non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant) OR childbearing potential, and agrees to use adequate contraception.

Exclusion criteria

* Either (a) bulky disease, or (b) any residual disease which in the opinion of the investigator will need imminent second-line therapy * Synchronous primary endometrial carcinoma, or a past history of primary endometrial carcinoma, are excluded unless certain conditions are met. * Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities * Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) \> 480 msecs * History of any one or more cardiovascular conditions within the past 6 months prior to randomization * Poorly controlled hypertension * History of cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months prior to randomization * Major surgery (including interval debulking) or trauma within 28 days, or minor surgical procedures within 7 days, prior to randomization, or has any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer. * Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding diathesis. * Hemoptysis within 6 weeks prior to randomization. * Endobronchial metastases. * Serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical (e.g., uncontrolled infection), psychiatric, or other condition that could interfere with subject's safety, provision of informed consent, or compliance to study procedures. * Investigational or anti-VEGF anticancer therapy prior to study randomization. * Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to pazopanib. * Prior or concurrent invasive malignancies that currently or within the last 5 years show/ed activity of disease (except ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, or concurrent endometrial cancer FIGO stages IA/B)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization until evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first (average of 15.2 months)PFS is defined as the time interval between randomization and evidence of progressive disease (PD), as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, or death, whichever occurred first. A visit-based analysis approach to determine participants' dates of progression was applied in the analysis method. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS by Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CriteriaFrom randomization to the earliest date of disease progression per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause (average of 15.2 months)PFS by GCIG criteria is defined as the time from the randomization date to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause. Per GCIG criteria, an objective progression is defined as the earliest event of either tumor progression based on RECIST v1.0 or confirmed CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as Progressed per RECIST if the radiological PD per RECIST occurred prior to or on the same day as CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as Progressed per CA-125 if the radiological PD occurred after CA-125 progression. Per RECIST, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.
Number of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose InterruptionFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.
Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events.
Number of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study TreatmentFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or 4 AEFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE.
Number of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. The NCI-CTCAE Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE. ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase.
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until death due to any cause (average of 29.4 months)Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Number of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diatolic blood pressure (DBP) are measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A participant could have been counted in more than one shift category. Participants who experienced shifts in both SBP and DBP are represented under each individual parameter. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)12-lead ECGs were obtained at the scheduled visits. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period. The QTc is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. In general, the faster the heart rate the shorter the QTc. If a QTc \>=500 milliseconds (msec) was noted on a scheduled or unscheduled electrocardiogram (ECG), then two additional ECGs should have been obtained within 5 minutes to confirm the abnormality. The average QTc was determined from the three ECG tracings by manual evaluation and was used to determine continued eligibility.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead.
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionFrom Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on.

Countries

China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo administered orally once daily for up to 24 months.
72
Pazopanib 800 Milligrams
Participants received pazopanib 800 milligrams administered orally once daily for up to 24 months.
73
Total145

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1412
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPazopanib 800 MilligramsTotal
Age, Continuous54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46
51.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
72 participants73 participants145 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants73 Participants145 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
59 / 7272 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 727 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time interval between randomization and evidence of progressive disease (PD), as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, or death, whichever occurred first. A visit-based analysis approach to determine participants' dates of progression was applied in the analysis method. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.

Time frame: From randomization until evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first (average of 15.2 months)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were not screen failures. Participants who were screen failures and randomized by mistake, but who did not receive study treatment, were not included. The treatment assignment in the ITT Population was based on the randomized treatment. The data cut off was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)18.1 months
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsProgression-free Survival (PFS)18.1 months
95% CI: [0.595, 1.626]
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose Reduction

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionPermanent discontinuation1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionDose interruption29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionDose reduction24 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionPermanent discontinuation18 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionDose interruption67 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose ReductionDose reduction63 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose Interruption

Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose InterruptionAny Reduction26 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose InterruptionAny Interruption44 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose InterruptionAny Reduction64 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose InterruptionAny Interruption65 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or 4 AE

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Grade 3 or 4 AE8 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any Grade 3 or 4 AE39 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE65 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE4 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE72 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE7 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study Treatment

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study TreatmentAny AE related to study treatment52 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study TreatmentAny on-therapy AE65 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study TreatmentAny AE related to study treatment71 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study TreatmentAny on-therapy AE72 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAE

An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny SAE4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny SAE related to study treatment1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny fatal SAE0 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny SAE7 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny SAE related to study treatment4 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAEAny fatal SAE0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEs

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. The NCI-CTCAE Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE. ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product. Treatment assignments in the All Treated Population were based on the actual treatment received, if different from the randomized treatment. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAST increased, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsBone pain, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsDiarrhea, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsToothache, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutrophil count decreased, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsPyrexia, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsHepatic function abnormal, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsHypertension, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsLiver injury, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutrophil count decreased, Grade 40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAbdominal distension, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsALT increased, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsBradycardia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsArthralgia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsFebrile neutropenia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsLeukopenia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsThrombus in device, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsUpper respiratory tract infection, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsPruritis, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsThrombocytopenia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAmylase increased, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsProtein urine, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsCerebral ischaemia, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutropenia, Grade 30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsFoot fracture, Grade 31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsProteinuria, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsFoot fracture, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsHypertension, Grade 313 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutropenia, Grade 39 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsLeukopenia, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsDiarrhea, Grade 35 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsALT increased, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsThrombocytopenia, Grade 33 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAST increased, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutrophil count decreased, Grade 32 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsNeutrophil count decreased, Grade 41 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsArthralgia, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsUpper respiratory tract infection, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsProtein urine, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsProteinuria, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsBone pain, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsToothache, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsHepatic function abnormal, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsLiver injury, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAbdominal distension, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsBradycardia, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsFebrile neutropenia, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsThrombus in device, Grade 31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsPruritis, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsAmylase increased, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsCerebral ischaemia, Grade 30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEsPyrexia, Grade 30 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2

The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 20 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 21 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 00 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 112 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 21 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 056 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 00 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 113 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 00 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 113 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 10 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 046 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 2; shift to 20 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 0; shift to 20 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 20 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2Baseline score of 1; shift to 00 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From Baseline

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diatolic blood pressure (DBP) are measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A participant could have been counted in more than one shift category. Participants who experienced shifts in both SBP and DBP are represented under each individual parameter. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population. One participant on placebo did not report any blood pressure measurements post-Baseline. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Any increase to >=120 mmHg28 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Increase to 140-<160 mmHg4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Increase to >=160 mmHg0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Any increase to >=80 mmHg35 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Increase to 90-<100 mmHg1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Increase to >=100 mmHg0 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Increase to 90-<100 mmHg25 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Any increase to >=120 mmHg53 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Any increase to >=80 mmHg59 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Increase to 140-<160 mmHg23 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineDBP, Increase to >=100 mmHg5 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From BaselineSBP, Increase to >=160 mmHg6 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline Grade

Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population. Data are presented for only those participants with laboratory values. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, AGI, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, AGI, n=69, 699 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, ITG3, n=69, 691 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, AGI, n=69, 7016 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, AGI, n=69, 702 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, AGI, n=69, 696 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, ITG3, n=69, 691 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, AGI, n=69, 702 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, AGI, n=69, 702 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, AGI, n=69, 694 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, AGI, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, AGI, n=69, 7010 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, AGI, n=69, 696 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, AGI, n=69, 701 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, AGI, n=69, 692 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, AGI, n=69, 706 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, AGI, n=69, 702 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, ITG3, n=69, 701 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, AGI, n=69, 693 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, AGI, n=69, 692 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypercalcemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeCreatinine, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, AGI, n=69, 7014 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperglycemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, AGI, n=69, 701 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, AGI, n=69, 703 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyperkalemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, AGI, n=69, 692 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypomagnesemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, ITG3, n=69, 691 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypoglycemia, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypermagnesemia, ITG4, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, ITG3, n=69, 690 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, AGI, n=69, 701 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHyponatremia, AGI, n=69, 701 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypokalemia, ITG3, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeAlbumin, ITG4, n=69, 700 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePhosphate, AGI, n=69, 694 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypernatremia, AGI, n=69, 703 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHypocalcemia, AGI, n=69, 695 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline Grade

Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population. Data are presented for only those participants with laboratory values. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, ITG30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, ITG40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, AGI11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, AGI10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, ITG40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, ITG30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, ITG32 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, ITG40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, AGI22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, AGI19 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, ITG40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, ITG30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, ITG30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, ITG40 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, AGI4 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, ITG40 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, AGI14 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, ITG31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, ITG30 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeHemoglobin, ITG40 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, AGI9 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeLymphocytes, ITG40 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, AGI55 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, ITG311 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeNeutrophils, ITG42 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, AGI32 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, ITG31 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradePlatelets, ITG40 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, AGI48 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline GradeWhite blood cells, ITG32 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)

12-lead ECGs were obtained at the scheduled visits. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period. The QTc is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. In general, the faster the heart rate the shorter the QTc. If a QTc \>=500 milliseconds (msec) was noted on a scheduled or unscheduled electrocardiogram (ECG), then two additional ECGs should have been obtained within 5 minutes to confirm the abnormality. The average QTc was determined from the three ECG tracings by manual evaluation and was used to determine continued eligibility.

Time frame: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Population: All Treated Population. Only those participants for which a post-Baseline ECG was conducted were analyzed. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Any increase to >=450 msec10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Increase to 481-500 msec1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Increase to >=501 msec2 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Any increase to >=450 msec5 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Increase to 481-500 msec1 participants
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Increase to >=501 msec0 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: From randomization until death due to any cause (average of 29.4 months)

Population: ITT Population. Participants who were alive as of study completion were censored at the last contact date. The cut off for these data was January 10, 2014.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboOverall SurvivalNA months
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsOverall SurvivalNA months
p-value: 0.590195% CI: [0.376, 1.751]Log Rank
Secondary

PFS by Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria

PFS by GCIG criteria is defined as the time from the randomization date to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause. Per GCIG criteria, an objective progression is defined as the earliest event of either tumor progression based on RECIST v1.0 or confirmed CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as Progressed per RECIST if the radiological PD per RECIST occurred prior to or on the same day as CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as Progressed per CA-125 if the radiological PD occurred after CA-125 progression. Per RECIST, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.

Time frame: From randomization to the earliest date of disease progression per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause (average of 15.2 months)

Population: ITT Population. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPFS by Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria15.2 months
Pazopanib 800 MilligramsPFS by Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria16.1 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026