Skip to content

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) Plus Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

An Open-label Study to Assess the Effect of Combination Treatment With Avastin and Xeloda, Plus Pre-operative Standard Radiotherapy, on Response Rate in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01227707
Enrollment
43
Registered
2010-10-25
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2015-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

This open-label study will assess the efficacy and safety of Avastin (bevacizumab) plus Xeloda (capecitabine) in combination with standard technique radiotherapy of the pelvic region in the neo-adjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer. Patients will receive 4 courses of Avastin at a dose of 5 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 2 weeks and for 38 days Xeloda at dose of 825 mg/kg twice daily orally, plus radiation therapy. After surgery, adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and, at the discretion of the investigator, with Avastin 5 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks for at least 6 months will be given.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab [Avastin]

5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, 4 cycles

DRUGcapecitabine [Xeloda]

825 mg/m2 twice daily orally, 38 days

RADIATIONRadiation therapy

Total dose of 45 Gy over 38 days

6-8 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant treatment

DRUG5-fluorouracil

Post-surgery adjuvant therapy: bolus of 400mg/m2 iv plus iv infusion of 600 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2 of each 2-week cycle for 6 months

DRUGleucovorin

Post-surgery adjuvant treatment: 100 mg/m2 iv on Days 1 and 2 of each 2-week cycle for 6 months

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, \>=18 years of age * Patients with confirmed rectal cancer who are subject to surgery and would benefit from pre-operative combined chemo-radiotherapy * Measurable and/or evaluable lesions according to RECIST criteria * EOCG performance status 0-1

Exclusion criteria

* Prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy for rectal cancer * Untreated brain metastases or spinal cord compression or primary brain tumors * Chronic daily treatment with high-dose aspirin (\>325 mg/day) or other medications known to predispose to gastrointestinal ulceration * Co-existing malignancies, or malignancies diagnosed within the last 5 years, with the exception of basal and squamous cell cancer, or cervical cancer in situ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)6 to 8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant treatmentpCR was defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, as determined by standard histologic procedure, in the tumor specimen (including regional lymph nodes) obtained at surgery. In order to minimize evaluation bias, tumor specimens were analyzed by both a central and local pathologist. The number of participants with pathological tumor stage 0 (pT0) and regional lymph nodes stage 0 (pN0) at surgery was determined. pCR was defined as the number of participants with pT0 and pN0 at surgery divided by the total number of participants with pathological tumor stage data collected.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of Procedure6 to 8 weeks after completion of study treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Neoadjuvant TreatmentBL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatmentPercentage of participants with CR was evaluated as the proportion of participants with complete response for the target and non-target lesions, separately, at the end of NAT according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels.
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response of CR at the End of Neoadjuvant TreatmentBL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatmentPercentage of participants with an overall response of CR was evaluated as the proportion of participants with CR for the target and non-target lesions plus absence of new lesions at the end of NAT according to RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker levels.
Percentage of Participants With New Lesions at the Primary Tumor Site at the End of Neoadjuvant TreatmentBL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatmentThe percentage of participants with new lesions located at the primary tumor site were evaluated at the end of NAT.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse During Follow-UpBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 monthsThe percentage of participants with local and/or regional relapse during follow-up. New lesions located at rectum or at colon or at lymph node detected at the end of NAT were evaluated as local and/or regional relapse.
Percentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline (BL) and end of neoadjuvant treatment (within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatment)The frequencies of clinical tumor stage T (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or X), regional lymph nodes stage N (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4), and distant metastasis clinical stage M (0, 1, or X) at baseline and at the end of NAT were assessed. The frequencies of pathological tumor stage T and regional lymph nodes stage N at surgery were evaluated. The clinical tumor and lymph node status was assessed by clinical examination, endosonography, and/or rectosigmoidoscopy, and pelvic and abdomen computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Response to treatment had to be assessed within 6 weeks after end of treatment by using the same techniques performed at baseline.
DFS - Time to EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 monthsThe time in months from date of start-of-treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. If a participant did not have an event, the time was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of first day of treatment until death due to any cause or the last date the participant was known to be alive.
OS - Time to EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of first day of treatment until death due to any cause or the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Disease Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 monthsTTP was defined as the time from date of treatment start until first documented progression of disease or death due to underlying cancer.
TTP - Time to EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 monthsTTP was defined as the time from date of treatment start until first documented progression of disease or death due to underlying cancer. TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) - Percentage of Participants With an EventBL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 monthsDFS was defined as the time from treatment start date to the date of first progression of disease or date of death due to any cause.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FU
Participants received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV on Days -14, 1, 15, and 29 and capecitabine 825 mg/m\^2 PO BID from Days 1 to 38. Participants also received radiation therapy given at a daily fraction of 1.8 Gy administered in 5 weekly fractions starting at Week 1 (through Week 6) for a maximum total dose of 45 Gy. Six to 8 weeks following all above treatments, participants received complete mesorectal excision surgery. After surgery, participants received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV on Day 1 and leucovorin 100 mg/m\^2 IV (over 2 hours) followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2 IV bolus and then 5-FU 600 mg/m\^2 IV (over 22 hours) on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles.
43
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyMedical decision6
Overall StudyPatient non-compliance3
Overall StudyProgression of disease3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FU
Age, Continuous61.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.85
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

pCR was defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, as determined by standard histologic procedure, in the tumor specimen (including regional lymph nodes) obtained at surgery. In order to minimize evaluation bias, tumor specimens were analyzed by both a central and local pathologist. The number of participants with pathological tumor stage 0 (pT0) and regional lymph nodes stage 0 (pN0) at surgery was determined. pCR was defined as the number of participants with pT0 and pN0 at surgery divided by the total number of participants with pathological tumor stage data collected.

Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant treatment

Population: ITT population; only participants who underwent surgery and had pathological tumor stage data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)10.00 percentage of participants
p-value: 1one sample binomial test
Secondary

DFS - Time to Event

The time in months from date of start-of-treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. If a participant did not have an event, the time was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUDFS - Time to Event27.43 monthsStandard Deviation 1.71
Secondary

Disease-Free Survival (DFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

DFS was defined as the time from treatment start date to the date of first progression of disease or date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUDisease-Free Survival (DFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event30.23 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS - Time to Event

OS was defined as the time from the date of first day of treatment until death due to any cause or the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUOS - Time to Event32.14 monthsStandard Deviation 1.46
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

OS was defined as the time from the date of first day of treatment until death due to any cause or the last date the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUOverall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event25.58 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)

The frequencies of clinical tumor stage T (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or X), regional lymph nodes stage N (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4), and distant metastasis clinical stage M (0, 1, or X) at baseline and at the end of NAT were assessed. The frequencies of pathological tumor stage T and regional lymph nodes stage N at surgery were evaluated. The clinical tumor and lymph node status was assessed by clinical examination, endosonography, and/or rectosigmoidoscopy, and pelvic and abdomen computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Response to treatment had to be assessed within 6 weeks after end of treatment by using the same techniques performed at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (BL) and end of neoadjuvant treatment (within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatment)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T3, N22.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T3, NX2.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T3, NX6.98 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T4, N32.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T0, N00 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T0, N04.65 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T1, N00 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T1, N04.65 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T1, NX0 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T1, NX2.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T2, N00 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T2, N018.60 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T2, N19.30 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T2, N19.30 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T2, NX0 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T2, NX6.98 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T3, N032.56 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T3, N018.60 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T3, N146.51 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T3, N19.30 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T3, N20 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T4, N00 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T4, N04.65 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T4, N12.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T4, N10 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: T4, N22.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T4, N20 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: T4, N30 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: TX, N00 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: TX, N02.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: TX, N22.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: TX, N20 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: M097.67 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: M081.40 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: M12.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: M12.33 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)Baseline: MX0 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants by Primary Tumor (T), Regional Lymph Nodes (N), and Distant Metastasis (M) Clinical Stage at Baseline and at the End of Neo-Adjuvant Treatment (NAT)End of NAT: MX9.30 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of Procedure

Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks after completion of study treatment

Population: ITT population; only participants who underwent surgery were included in the analysis. n (number) equals (=) number of participants assessed for the specified parameter (colostomy)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureAnterior resection70.0 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureAbdomen-peritoneal amputation (Miles)22.5 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureOther3.0 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureColostomy, temporary (n=32)47.50 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureColostomy, definitive (n=32)32.50 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery by Type of ProcedureNo colostomy20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response of CR at the End of Neoadjuvant Treatment

Percentage of participants with an overall response of CR was evaluated as the proportion of participants with CR for the target and non-target lesions plus absence of new lesions at the end of NAT according to RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker levels.

Time frame: BL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatment

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With an Overall Response of CR at the End of Neoadjuvant Treatment9.30 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Neoadjuvant Treatment

Percentage of participants with CR was evaluated as the proportion of participants with complete response for the target and non-target lesions, separately, at the end of NAT according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels.

Time frame: BL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatment

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Neoadjuvant TreatmentCR of target lesion(s)11.63 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Neoadjuvant TreatmentCR of non-target lesion(s)18.60 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Lesions at the Primary Tumor Site at the End of Neoadjuvant Treatment

The percentage of participants with new lesions located at the primary tumor site were evaluated at the end of NAT.

Time frame: BL and within 6 weeks after the completion of study treatment

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With New Lesions at the Primary Tumor Site at the End of Neoadjuvant Treatment4.65 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse During Follow-Up

The percentage of participants with local and/or regional relapse during follow-up. New lesions located at rectum or at colon or at lymph node detected at the end of NAT were evaluated as local and/or regional relapse.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until progression, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population; only participants who underwent radical surgery were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Relapse During Follow-UpNo Relapse84.21 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Relapse During Follow-Up1 Relapse7.89 percentage of participants
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUPercentage of Participants With Relapse During Follow-Up2 Relapses7.89 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Disease Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

TTP was defined as the time from date of treatment start until first documented progression of disease or death due to underlying cancer.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUTime to Disease Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event27.91 percentage of participants
Secondary

TTP - Time to Event

TTP was defined as the time from date of treatment start until first documented progression of disease or death due to underlying cancer. TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: BL, within 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, every 2 weeks for 1 year following surgery, every 3 months thereafter until death, up to 45 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bv+Capecitabine/Bv+Leucovorin+5-FUTTP - Time to Event27.68 monthsStandard Deviation 1.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026