Skip to content

Accuracy of Spybite Forceps When Compared to Conventional Sampling Methods

Prospective Evaluation of the Accuracy of Spybite Biopsy Forceps for the Tissue Diagnosis of Lesion of the Pancreatobiliary System. ( Part of the The Clinical Utility of Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreaticobiliary Disorders Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01227382
Enrollment
26
Registered
2010-10-25
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2015-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accuracy of Tissue Diagnosis, Bile Duct Stricture, Pancreatic Duct Stricture

Brief summary

The investigators are evaluating the use of a SpyBite biopsy forceps for tissue diagnosis when compared to standard biopsy techniques.

Detailed description

The participants will undergo an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with cholangiopancreatoscopy and evaluation of a bile duct or pancreatic duct stricture with three different types of techniques for biopsy: SpyBite biopsy forceps, cytology brush and RJ3biopsy forceps.

Interventions

PROCEDUREERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with cholangiopancreatoscopy and sampling of stricture with SpyBite biopsy forceps, cytology brush and RJ3biopsy forceps

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects is 18 years or older 2. Scheduled to undergo Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) wiht cholangioscopy and/or pancreatoscopy at the University of Florida Gainesville Florida as medically indicated. 3. Lesion of the pancreatobiliary system that requires tissue sampling as medically indicated 4. Subject myst be able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Any contraindication to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) 2. The subject is unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of Cancerup to 7 days after the procedureThe diagnostic accuracy of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps sampling of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). All three methods were used at baseline to obtain a sample for the determination of cancer vs. no cancer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Procedure Time120 minutesThe total time to perform ERCP
Total Cholangioscopy Time60 minutesThis is the total time it takes for the dye to be performed during the ERCP.
Procedure Technical Successday 1The procedure technical success was defined when all of the following criteria were met: Successful advancement of the cholangioscope to the desired target, adequate cholangioscopic visualization of the area of interest, and successful applications of of all sampling maneuvers with visible tissue seen macroscopically when obtaining mini forceps and standard forceps biopsy samples.
Sampling Times for Each Device15 minutesThe sampling time of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Adverse Events24 hoursAdverse events were prospectively evaluated at the end of the procedure, at discharge from the endoscopy unit, and by telephone call 24 hours post procedure. Adverse events were defined and graded using the 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy consensus criteria.
Cholangioscopy Visualization Time30 minutesThe portion of the total ERCP time spent on Cholangioscopy visualization.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Indeterminate Biliary Lesions Requiring Tissue Sampling
Each patient underwent triple sampling of the identified biliary lesion with cholangioscopy-guided mini-forceps biopsy, standard cytology brushing, and standard forceps biopsy.
26
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIndeterminate Biliary Lesions Requiring Tissue Sampling
Age, Continuous67.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.37
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of Cancer

The diagnostic accuracy of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps sampling of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). All three methods were used at baseline to obtain a sample for the determination of cancer vs. no cancer.

Time frame: up to 7 days after the procedure

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to thePercentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of CancerCytology brush38.5 percentage of accurate diagnoses
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to thePercentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of CancerStandard forceps biopsy53.9 percentage of accurate diagnoses
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to thePercentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of CancerSpybite biopsy84.6 percentage of accurate diagnoses
Secondary

Adverse Events

Adverse events were prospectively evaluated at the end of the procedure, at discharge from the endoscopy unit, and by telephone call 24 hours post procedure. Adverse events were defined and graded using the 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy consensus criteria.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theAdverse Events3 participants
Secondary

Cholangioscopy Visualization Time

The portion of the total ERCP time spent on Cholangioscopy visualization.

Time frame: 30 minutes

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theCholangioscopy Visualization Time11.69 minutesStandard Deviation 8.03
Secondary

Procedure Technical Success

The procedure technical success was defined when all of the following criteria were met: Successful advancement of the cholangioscope to the desired target, adequate cholangioscopic visualization of the area of interest, and successful applications of of all sampling maneuvers with visible tissue seen macroscopically when obtaining mini forceps and standard forceps biopsy samples.

Time frame: day 1

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theProcedure Technical Success26 participants
Secondary

Sampling Times for Each Device

The sampling time of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Time frame: 15 minutes

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theSampling Times for Each DeviceSpybite forceps11.92 minutesStandard Deviation 4.67
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theSampling Times for Each DeviceStandard cytology brushing3.77 minutesStandard Deviation 1.21
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theSampling Times for Each DeviceStandard forceps biopsy5.73 minutesStandard Deviation 3.11
Secondary

Total Cholangioscopy Time

This is the total time it takes for the dye to be performed during the ERCP.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theTotal Cholangioscopy Time23.65 minutesStandard Deviation 9.43
Secondary

Total Procedure Time

The total time to perform ERCP

Time frame: 120 minutes

Population: Percentage of participants with accurate diagnoses of cancer

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diagnostic Accuracy of SpyBite Biopsy Forceps Compared to theTotal Procedure Time54.00 minutesStandard Deviation 12.71

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026